Received: by 10.204.148.22 with SMTP id n22mr88642bkv.0.1350314382396; Mon, 15 Oct 2012 08:19:42 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: hspbp@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.204.129.72 with SMTP id n8ls4919901bks.0.gmail; Mon, 15 Oct 2012 08:19:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.145.140 with SMTP id d12mr774991bkv.6.1350314381634; Mon, 15 Oct 2012 08:19:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.145.140 with SMTP id d12mr774990bkv.6.1350314381617; Mon, 15 Oct 2012 08:19:41 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mail-la0-f41.google.com (mail-la0-f41.google.com [209.85.215.41]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id y23si336635bkv.2.2012.10.15.08.19.41 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 15 Oct 2012 08:19:41 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 209.85.215.41 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of szf...@wsbricks.com) client-ip=209.85.215.41; Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 209.85.215.41 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of szf...@wsbricks.com) smtp.mail=szf...@wsbricks.com Received: by mail-la0-f41.google.com with SMTP id p5so3863624lag.0 for ; Mon, 15 Oct 2012 08:19:41 -0700 (PDT) d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :x-gm-message-state; bh=9C1+1YUfGBnPAaFqvln5iWW71wNOn6VxO/HjODgBbRE=; b=lcbDsyaSrovWQNGGyCN61l18rT6I8nOWCnUVUsiyQRDb17TKVBWCXpiIo92yk5OWjV njYduw+LIy5dYrEFcwxVJVluffS9i6bHNJVBjA/0kiUfK7xnDQyCP6OeBziuc+II4G6y VvQrB0VpOcTCJXi5v5Rnb0IktSmQKwbR59XR57+/3EKEM7RGPgzJrEheHH88RqBWW48s emZRCqoxwktcc72yJYsY8Or6kpg/uUcaajt1IhDNro+ZwwQwNhCzo+FyEV0T4mOCVLoL ErDJDzamxA24Ns9M4YRAL+gMflhkXzKX3r2iR0KavdkY3YM9inWs3h4BjENs1J0/R/Fe Gf3Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.112.103.135 with SMTP id fw7mr4382152lbb.16.1350314380965; Mon, 15 Oct 2012 08:19:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.112.144.199 with HTTP; Mon, 15 Oct 2012 08:19:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [92.8.101.168] In-Reply-To: <20121011094039.GC5...@ctrlc.hu> References: <20121011094039.GC5...@ctrlc.hu> Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2012 17:19:40 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [hsp] eduID RFID From: Ferenc Szalai To: hspbp@googlegroups.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmnd4uoGACvjdQU1d3uYOOZyoMlCqsDRRoseTjBfIX1X6FQCZBaUkFkCklgRo+yZibLLBh7 2012/10/11 stef : > On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 10:53:34AM +0200, M=C3=A1zsa P=C3=A9ter wrote: >> Tudja valaki, hogy az eduID http://eduid.hu >> http://itcafe.hu/hir/niif_hbone_projektzaras.html >> - azon k=C3=ADv=C3=BCl, hogy egy f=C3=B6derat=C3=ADv azonos=C3=ADt=C3= =B3 rendszer, ami a di=C3=A1kok >> online k=C3=B6vet=C3=A9s=C3=A9t az =C3=A1llam sz=C3=A1m=C3=A1ra real-tim= e teszi lehet=C5=91v=C3=A9 (l=C3=A1sd: >> csatolva), > > ilyen volt eddig is. eduroamnak hivtak, aszem szferi aktivan reszt is vet= t > benne. Az eduroam az wifi volt nem rfid ;) (Igen mindkettohoz kozom volt, de ne verjetek erte, a veglegesert viszont nem vallalok kezesseget ;) > ez saml alapu egyebkent, es arra van valami vicces zuzas (meg nem olvasta= m): > http://www.nds.rub.de/research/publications/BreakingSAML/ Sajnos Shib alapu minden korabbi igyekezetem ellenere. A Shib egy kicsit modositott SAML 2.0 ami a kicsit modositottsag miatt eppen annyira nem kompatibilis iparagi standardokkal mint szoktak az ilyen akademiai baszok lenni. Ugyhogy koki. Ez van. -- Udv Feri