Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Microsoft patentirao SUDO?

0 views
Skip to first unread message

fraGerrard

unread,
Nov 12, 2009, 3:22:22 AM11/12/09
to

http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20091111151305785

Ivan Tisljar

unread,
Nov 12, 2009, 5:09:55 AM11/12/09
to
fraGerrard wrote :
>
> http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20091111151305785

Nema nikakav abstract?

Ivan

--
- Well, Moss, has it been completely demagnetized?
- By Steven Hawking himself.


disco

unread,
Nov 12, 2009, 6:23:56 AM11/12/09
to
On 12.11.2009 11:09, Ivan Tisljar (work) wrote:
> fraGerrard wrote :
>>
>> http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20091111151305785
>
> Nema nikakav abstract?

ima...
http://tinyurl.com/yctyvph

btw, gore je pogresan link. ovaj je pravi:
http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20091111094923390

--
winter is the season in which people try to keep the house as warm
as it was in the summer, when they complained about the heat.

fraGerrard

unread,
Nov 12, 2009, 6:52:09 AM11/12/09
to

Sorry:) Imao sam oba otvoreno pa sam krivi stavio:/

Josip Almasi

unread,
Nov 12, 2009, 7:40:26 AM11/12/09
to
Kul:) Zamisli ukucas man sudo i dobijes

One or more computer-readable media having computer-readable
instructions therein that, when executed by a computing device, cause
the computing device to present a user interface in response to a task
being prohibited based on a user's current account not having a right to
permit the task, the user interface comprising: information indicating
the task and an entity that attempted the task; a selectable help
graphic wherein responsive to receiving selection of the selectable help
graphic, the computer-readable instructions further cause the computing
device to present the information; identifiers, each of the identifiers
identifying other accounts having a right to permit the task, wherein
the identifiers presented are based on criteria comprising: frequency of
use; association with the user; and indication of sufficient but not
unlimited rights; one of the identifiers identifies a higher-rights
account having a right to permit the task, wherein the one of the
identifiers comprises: a graphic identifying the higher-rights accounts
associated with the user; and a name of the higher-rights account; an
authenticator region capable of receiving, from the user, an
authenticator usable to authenticate the higher-rights account having
the right to permit the task, wherein: the authenticator comprises a
password, and the authenticator region comprises a data-entry field
configured to receive the password.

:)))

Pozdrav...

Ivan Tisljar

unread,
Nov 12, 2009, 8:08:48 AM11/12/09
to
on 12.11.2009., fraGerrard supposed :

> Sorry:) Imao sam oba otvoreno pa sam krivi stavio:/

Ček, patentirali su RunAs? :)

Igor Pozgaj

unread,
Nov 12, 2009, 9:31:41 AM11/12/09
to
On 2009-11-12, Ivan Tisljar <hlloyge_vis@k_yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> on 12.11.2009., fraGerrard supposed :
>
>> Sorry:) Imao sam oba otvoreno pa sam krivi stavio:/
>
> ??ek, patentirali su RunAs? :)

Ne, ovo je drukcije, sistem elevated permissiona. Imas ga
od Viste na dalje.

--
Igor Pozgaj | ipozgaj at gmail.com (GTalk / MSN)
ICQ: 126002505 | http://fly.srk.fer.hr/~ipozgaj
PGP: 0xEF36A092 | http://ipozgaj.blogspot.com
fb, lfm, li, dA | http://twitter.com/ipozgaj

Aleksandar Kuktin

unread,
Nov 12, 2009, 10:08:20 AM11/12/09
to
> On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 12:23:56 +0100, disco wrote:

> On 12.11.2009 11:09, Ivan Tisljar (work) wrote:
>> fraGerrard wrote :
>>>
>>> http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20091111151305785
>>
>> Nema nikakav abstract?
>
> ima...
> http://tinyurl.com/yctyvph
>
> btw, gore je pogresan link. ovaj je pravi:
> http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20091111094923390

Pa sad?

Ko ih j***.

A) Dobro je da konačno ipak počinju malo menjati svoju sigurnosnu
paradigmu, iako
B) mogu da zamislim 10.385.513 način na koji će ovaj delimični i
nedovoljni pokušaj portovanja unix sigurnosnog modela samo još više
srozati sigurnost Windowsa. I to nakon samo 2 sekunde razmišljanja.
Konačno,
C) Nekako ne mogu da zamislim da će SCO, IBM, Hewlett-Packard, Apple,
Sun, Red Hat, The Linux Foundation i druga menadžerija pustiti Microsoft-
u da im naplaćuje za svoj "patent".

Evil's Toy

unread,
Nov 12, 2009, 10:14:09 AM11/12/09
to
Aleksandar Kuktin wrote:
>> On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 12:23:56 +0100, disco wrote:
>
>> On 12.11.2009 11:09, Ivan Tisljar (work) wrote:
>>> fraGerrard wrote :
>>>> http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20091111151305785
>>> Nema nikakav abstract?
>> ima...
>> http://tinyurl.com/yctyvph
>>
>> btw, gore je pogresan link. ovaj je pravi:
>> http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20091111094923390
>
> Pa sad?
>
> Ko ih j***.
>
> A) Dobro je da kona�no ipak po�inju malo menjati svoju sigurnosnu
> paradigmu, iako
> B) mogu da zamislim 10.385.513 na�in na koji �e ovaj delimi�ni i
> nedovoljni poku�aj portovanja unix sigurnosnog modela samo jo� vi�e
> srozati sigurnost Windowsa. I to nakon samo 2 sekunde razmi�ljanja.
> Kona�no,
> C) Nekako ne mogu da zamislim da �e SCO, IBM, Hewlett-Packard, Apple,
> Sun, Red Hat, The Linux Foundation i druga menad�erija pustiti Microsoft-
> u da im napla�uje za svoj "patent".

E da je kojim slucajem IBM izabrao cp/m umesto DOS/a ....

Jel se secate tih kilobajt asm koda je bilo toliko bagovito
da je IBM morao da izbaci IBM_DOS ;)

Poz!

Rado

unread,
Nov 12, 2009, 5:02:16 PM11/12/09
to
Evil's Toy wrote:

> Jel se secate tih kilobajt asm koda je bilo toliko bagovito
> da je IBM morao da izbaci IBM_DOS ;)

4096 bajtova, da budemo precizni. Prvi command.com.

Ivan Tisljar

unread,
Nov 13, 2009, 2:27:42 AM11/13/09
to
Igor Pozgaj explained :

> Ne, ovo je drukcije, sistem elevated permissiona. Imas ga
> od Viste na dalje.

A, ono kad dvokliknem na setup.exe, a on mi kaže da moram unijeti
adminov username i password?
Pa to je nekakav automatizirani runas :)

0 new messages