TIG WANTED
Cass
Can even be non-working.
Cass
Patrick Humphrey
When are you beaming back up?
-PLH, that'll be a day to celebrate
Cass
Grow up, kiddo.
Cass
Ever wonder why you have the reputation as a stalker?
"Patrick Humphrey" <pat...@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkfzjz...@fnord.io.com...
Patrick Humphrey
>Humprhey:
>Grow up, kiddo.
Learn to type, Paranoia Man.
>Cass
>
>Ever wonder why you have the reputation as a stalker?
No, but then that's only because no one but you believes the fairy tale you're
pushing. (Free clue: responding to your posts doesn't equate to stalking.
Have some adult teach you how to operate your newsreader in an effective way.)
-PLH, I guess Roscoe got rained on this afternoon
Cass
Everyone including your former employer/s know that you are a stalker. I
can make a post and it is guaranteed that you will find it and make some
derogatory comment.
As I have repeatedly said: I don't like Scott Bradbury's ("...Tavish" )
methods of identifying you for what you are and what you do as it makes him
look almost as bad as you are but the fact remains that you do stalk people
to make your negative comments.
You are a child in a man's body.
Cass
"Patrick Humphrey" <pat...@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkekzi...@fnord.io.com...
Patrick Humphrey
>Humpy:
>
>Everyone including your former employer/s know that you are a stalker. I
>can make a post and it is guaranteed that you will find it and make some
>derogatory comment.
Gee, ya think maybe it's because you post to a newsgroup I read?
If you're so sure you know about me, call the cops. I suspect they won't
appreciate your whining.
>As I have repeatedly said: I don't like Scott Bradbury's ("...Tavish" )
>methods of identifying you for what you are and what you do as it makes him
>look almost as bad as you are but the fact remains that you do stalk people
>to make your negative comments.
Please point out the statute that bans "negative comments". If you don't like
my opinions, no one's making you read them, are they?
>You are a child in a man's body.
I'm not the one annoying multiple newsgroups, or showing clear signs of
paranoia. Thanks for the chuckle.
-PLH, yep, Roscoe got hosed down this afternoon
Phillipe
Patrick Humphrey <pat...@io.com> wrote:
At least one of you two should put the other in your KILL file.
Cass
You have shown up in newsgroups that I frequent that you have never been in
until you see my name and then you start. You know this, I know this and
others that you incessantly stalk, know this, too.
Net-nannies such as yourself really cause more harm than good. I posted an
adv. in houston.general and you go berserk?
You have lost jobs over your malady. Why not realize this and move on to
greener pastures? Chasing folks around is not good form and most folks hate
a net-cop wannabe.
Cass
"Patrick Humphrey" <pat...@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkoeym...@fnord.io.com...
Patrick Humphrey
>Humphrey:
>You have shown up in newsgroups that I frequent that you have never been in
>until you see my name and then you start. You know this, I know this and
>others that you incessantly stalk, know this, too.
Your delusional as usual, Roscoe. Name some of the groups you've allegedly
been followed to by me, and post some credible proof of your assertions.
>Net-nannies such as yourself really cause more harm than good. I posted an
>adv. in houston.general and you go berserk?
Post proof of that, as well. I have yet to go berserk over much of anything
posted in this newsgroup, while you're well known for routinely ignoring
little things like newsgroup charters and then whining when you get spanked.
Who's been TOSsed from more ISPs than I've ever had? You, of course.
>You have lost jobs over your malady. Why not realize this and move on to
>greener pastures? Chasing folks around is not good form and most folks hate
>a net-cop wannabe.
You're not most folks, Roscoe -- you're a paranoid little twit who can't stand
anyone daring to express an opinion you don't approve of. How many jobs have
I supposedly lost because of this alleged malady, precisely? (Remember, you
aren't party to the knowledge I possess, particularly as concerns my
employment. Pretend otherwise all you want, as it won't change that reality
at all.)
-PLH, put up or keep whining...what *will* Roscoe do? ;-)
Cass
I forgot to add in my last reply to you where you suggested that I call the
police about you. I am sure that you would not be shocked to learn that
they have a fair amount of information on you, as it is. I didn't call them
but I do know this. I know other things, too, such as why you got fired
from Rice.
Can't you see that your stalking is well-known and not just with Bradbury
(Tavish) and others but authorities, too?
Again, Humphrey, what triggered your 'episode' this time? I just posted an
adv. about a tig welder in houston.general and you start up with your
'disorder'. Why do these things upset you so very much? Haven't you yet
realized that your net-nannying is alienating almost everyone that you
lecture?
Kid, you are free to legally express any opinion whatsoever. You are free
to even break laws. I will have the biggest and greatest laugh when your
stalking gets you into more trouble than you can suspect. Remember this: no
criminal ever thinks that they will get caught.
Cass
"Patrick Humphrey" <pat...@io.com> wrote in message
news:szk65ku...@fnord.io.com...
Patrick Humphrey
>Humphrey:
>I forgot to add in my last reply to you where you suggested that I call the
>police about you. I am sure that you would not be shocked to learn that
>they have a fair amount of information on you, as it is. I didn't call them
>but I do know this. I know other things, too, such as why you got fired
>from Rice.
You claim you know things, but anyone can make that claim. Proving it is
another matter. Thanks for continuing to confirm that you're just making
noise to get attention.
>Can't you see that your stalking is well-known and not just with Bradbury
>(Tavish) and others but authorities, too?
I can't see what never existed to begin with, Roscoe. I appreciate your
giving the authorities a needed chuckle by displaying your ignorance of the
applicable law, and your arrogance in implying that I'm stalking you because
you seem to think that you decide who responds to your pleas for attention.
>Again, Humphrey, what triggered your 'episode' this time? I just posted an
>adv. about a tig welder in houston.general and you start up with your
>'disorder'. Why do these things upset you so very much? Haven't you yet
>realized that your net-nannying is alienating almost everyone that you
>lecture?
Haven't you yet realized that you have no idea of what I think (and
apparently, you're none too fast at figuring out what *you* think, as well)?
You posted the same off-topic boilerplate scam as you've been doing for years,
and when I point it out, you start this posting flurry. Projection appears to
be one of your few talents.
>Kid, you are free to legally express any opinion whatsoever. You are free
>to even break laws. I will have the biggest and greatest laugh when your
>stalking gets you into more trouble than you can suspect. Remember this: no
>criminal ever thinks that they will get caught.
Since I'm not a criminal, I don't have to worry about getting caught. Maybe
that's why I'm not the one digging up anything I can find about you, while
you're the one openly proclaiming you know all about me. Like I said, if you
really believe what you're spewing, call the cops. You won't, and in the
extremely unlikely case you ever do, you'll lie about it -- since you've lied
about it often enough, already.
-PLH, it's not rocket science to predict Roscoe's responses
Cass
First, the facts of which you can't dispute as this thread will be the
proof.
1. I advertised that I am wanting to buy a tig welding machine.
2. To which you replied:
"When are you beaming back up?
-PLH, that'll be a day to celebrate"
Those are the facts, kiddo.
Sure, you have the right to respond and call names and ridicule, etc. When
you do these things and follow me and many others around to various
newsgroups that they frequent and you don't, and then start your
name-calling, ridicule and other childish behavior, you get the reputation
of being a stalker.
Your employer/s and many of your victims know of your weird behavior and so
do the authorities.
You got fired from at least one job for your behavior. When this became
public, you denied it most vociferously. Then, as it became apparent that
you were caught, you finally admitted that you were fired.
So, the bottom line, Humphrey, is that I really don't care about you or your
mental disorders. I will just continue to post for things that I am looking
to buy for my hobbies and when you tune up with your mental issues, I will
simply continue to bring out the facts.
Cass
"Patrick Humphrey" <pat...@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkfzjx...@hagbard.io.com...
Patrick Humphrey
> First, the facts of which you can't dispute as this thread will be the
> proof.
> 1. I advertised that I am wanting to buy a tig welding machine.
Correct -- I've never disputed that. Posting it to houston.wanted, though,
would have been more appropriate than crossposting it to several newsgroups
that have nothing to do with this particular quest of yours. That's where you
jumped the shark.
> 2. To which you replied:
> "When are you beaming back up?
> -PLH, that'll be a day to celebrate"
> Those are the facts, kiddo.
That's what I posted. Where you wander off into fantasy land is when you
pretend you know what I was thinking at that moment. I was having fun putting
that up, as I knew you'd respond like the paranoid kook you are.
> Sure, you have the right to respond and call names and ridicule, etc. When
> you do these things and follow me and many others around to various
> newsgroups that they frequent and you don't, and then start your
> name-calling, ridicule and other childish behavior, you get the reputation
> of being a stalker.
Really? Precisely which newsgroups have I followed *you* to, pray tell? I've
only had access to Usenet since 1989.
> Your employer/s and many of your victims know of your weird behavior and so
> do the authorities.
...at least, in your imagination they do. Out here in the real world, there
are no such victims, though there are a couple of documented cranks who
repeatedly claim they're victims, but never provide any remotely credible
evidence -- and the authorities have more important problems to attend to than
catering to the fantasies of people who are trying to intimidate me into
silence, for whatever reason.
> You got fired from at least one job for your behavior. When this became
> public, you denied it most vociferously. Then, as it became apparent that
> you were caught, you finally admitted that you were fired.
Nice rewrite of history, Roscoe. I never said anything either way until some
of the thugs from alt.revisionism started trying to spread fantasies about
what had happened to me. Where did I deny that I'd been fired?
> So, the bottom line, Humphrey, is that I really don't care about you or your
> mental disorders. I will just continue to post for things that I am looking
> to buy for my hobbies and when you tune up with your mental issues, I will
> simply continue to bring out the facts.
Correction, Roscoe: you've already made up your mind, and you're not about to
let yourself be confused by the facts.
-PLH, if you're going to spin a tale, at least anchor it in reality, however
fleetingly
Cass
You are not only a stalker but a liar, too. I didn't cross-post. However,
you aren't authorized to tell me where my posts are appropriate. You try to
be a net-nanny and net-cop yet you cannot even control your own stalking.
You and I both know of the newsgroups that you stalk me. However, google
has the records for you or anyone else who is curious enough to find out
about your stalking.
Humphrey: you talk of paranoia and then you say that no one is going to
intimidate you into being silent! Kid, do you know what you are saying?
There is something seriously wrong with your thought-processes. I, of all
people, would never try to silence someone. I am a crusader about folks
being able to speak as they see fit; within the law, of course.
If you want to see where you have lied about you not being fired, try
google. You will be able to see your denials in many posts in many threads.
Humphrey, you are in error in so many things that you post and think, that
there has to be some pathology there.
I simply make a post about something that I am looking for and your
sphincter and mental disorders are triggered and you begin foaming.
Get some help of some sort.
Cass
"Patrick Humphrey" <pat...@io.com> wrote in message
news:slrnbk52jr....@hagbard.io.com...
Patrick Humphrey
>Humphrey:
>You are not only a stalker but a liar, too. I didn't cross-post. However,
>you aren't authorized to tell me where my posts are appropriate. You try to
>be a net-nanny and net-cop yet you cannot even control your own stalking.
You didn't cross-post? You mean that was some OTHER "Cass"
<NOT_ROADWARRIOR_S...@galaxycorp.com> that was crossposting to
houston.eats, rec.travel.rv, and a few other random spots? The things you
learn from reading news -- I'm impressed.
>You and I both know of the newsgroups that you stalk me. However, google
>has the records for you or anyone else who is curious enough to find out
>about your stalking.
In other words, you can't provide the proof. Oh, well, that's hardly the
first time you've run away when asked to back up your accusations. I guess
you're just whining to get attention, again. I'll continue to respond to your
stupidity when I feel like it, and there's nothing you can do but continue to
whine and make up more stories about me. You run away from your chance to
actually prove something, and that tells me all I need to know.
-PLH, having fun watching Roscoe try his Joan of Arc routine again
Cass
You cannot understand cross-posting so, you accuse others for something that
you don't understand.
Also, your non sequitur in thinking that because someone doesn't take you
and rub your nose into proof, it must not be so.
You always use that type of shallow thinking. DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH!
Then, with the mentality of a ten year old little girl, you state that you
will continue to respond to my posts and there is nothing that I can do
about it! Are you not able to see how you have gained the reputation of a
stalker? Are you not able to see that your posts are on the level of a
child's thinking?
Again, Humphrey, I simply made a post about an item that I was looking for
and you go 'mental'. Everywhere you go you stir up trouble.
Bradbury and others sure have your number.
Cass
"Patrick Humphrey" <pat...@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkekzg...@fnord.io.com...
Patrick Humphrey
>Humphrey:
>You cannot understand cross-posting so, you accuse others for something that
>you don't understand.
Typical -- assume you know more about me than I do. Shock people and come up
with something original, for once.
>Also, your non sequitur in thinking that because someone doesn't take you
>and rub your nose into proof, it must not be so.
>You always use that type of shallow thinking. DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH!
You claim to have "proof" (why do I get this image of it being a number around
108?) and then refuse to present it -- it's not rocket science to figure out
the motivation behind that response.
>Then, with the mentality of a ten year old little girl, you state that you
>will continue to respond to my posts and there is nothing that I can do
>about it! Are you not able to see how you have gained the reputation of a
>stalker? Are you not able to see that your posts are on the level of a
>child's thinking?
Are you too full of yourself to figure out that your perception isn't shared
by everyone else (and very likely, by anyone else)?
>Again, Humphrey, I simply made a post about an item that I was looking for
>and you go 'mental'. Everywhere you go you stir up trouble.
Now, how would you "know" that unless you're doing what you whine at me for
allegedly doing?
>Bradbury and others sure have your number.
Yeah, the same Bradbury who's a running joke in the office of his county's
district attorney *and* sheriff's department...I'm just a convenient target
for people with a screw or two loose in their heads, and you and Bradbury fit
the description.
-PLH, unlike Roscoe, some of us actually do talk to the authorities on
occasion
Cass
You can't stay on the topic, can you?
I said that I simply placed and advertisement about an item that I am
looking for for one of my hobbies and you go 'psycho'. You go that 'way'
quite a bit and many others have noticed it, too.
You really should quit stalking folks and trying to be a net-cop.
Bradbury and others, including the police department have your number and
m.o. They are not going to tell you of an on-going investigation, kiddo.
Again, do your own research on how you stalk folks and start flame-wars. It
is all there in google and you can find it easily.
Now, run along and pester someone else.
Cass
"Patrick Humphrey" <pat...@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkk797...@fnord.io.com...
Patrick Humphrey
>Humphrey:
>You can't stay on the topic, can you?
I'm doing a better job of it than you ever have, Roscoe. Maybe you should
quit changing your tune every time I come up with an observation you don't
have the backbone to deal with.
>I said that I simply placed and advertisement about an item that I am
>looking for for one of my hobbies and you go 'psycho'. You go that 'way'
>quite a bit and many others have noticed it, too.
So you say, while neatly implying that you know what I'm thinking better than
I do. What's it like, being so arrogant?
>You really should quit stalking folks and trying to be a net-cop.
You really should quit pretending you know anything more than what you can
see.
>Bradbury and others, including the police department have your number and
>m.o. They are not going to tell you of an on-going investigation, kiddo.
They definitely won't tell you, either. Quit pretending you know anything
else. Go ahead and puff your chest out and do your little dance. You're not
in a position to command credibility.
>Again, do your own research on how you stalk folks and start flame-wars. It
>is all there in google and you can find it easily.
Run away, Ross! RUN AWAY! How do you explain me being at one ISP for eight
years, while you've managed to get tossed by every ISP that had the misfortune
of doing business with you? (If I was going to stalk someone, wouldn't you
think I'd have some idea of what they look like and where they live by now, as
long as you claim I've been stalking you? You make it pretty obvious why you
never bother to actually prove your accusations or take your fairy tale to the
authorities -- at least you've enough sense to figure out that they don't like
being annoyed. I'll credit you with that much sense.)
>Now, run along and pester someone else.
Make me, Paranoia Boy. If I choose to respond to your whining, you have
precisely two options: answer or ignore. If you want to keep strafing your
feet every time you reply, feel free to do so. It won't be my problem.
-PLH, Roscoe goes in the "disgruntled, but harmless" folder
Cass
You are utterly juvenile in almost everything that you say.
You say: "Make me Paranoia Boy"! That sounds just like it would come from a
child.
Humphrey: Again, I say that I simply made a post about something that I am
looking for and for some insane reason and I really do mean 'insane', you
choose to go mental and start a fight over absolutely nothing.
What is it about my post that has such control over your emotions? It seems
very apparent that a simple post can make you revert to childhood insults.
Is your hold on reality that tenuous?
Humphrey: Realize this and drum it into your head, I made a simple post
about an item that I am wanting to buy and you go berserk. Patrick, this is
not the way of someone considered 'normal'. I don't pretend to analyze you
but anyone can see that if one simple post can send someone into such a
foaming, frothy dither as you are in, that is not normal. After all, it is
just energized phosphors on a glass plate that has control of you.
Cass
"Patrick Humphrey" <pat...@io.com> wrote in message
news:szk1xvf...@fnord.io.com...
Patrick Humphrey
You're powerless, Mister St. John. Albert's right -- you're cute when you're
on your high horse.
Enjoy being a minor-league kook, because I know I enjoy watching you live down
to expectations.
-PLH, like I said, Roscoe is disgruntled but harmless
Cass
looking for and for some insane reason and I really do mean 'insane', you
choose to go mental and start a fight over absolutely nothing.
What is it about my post that has such control over your emotions? It seems
very apparent that a simple post can make you revert to childhood insults.
Is your hold on reality that tenuous?
Humphrey: Realize this and drum it into your head, I made a simple post
about an item that I am wanting to buy and you go berserk. Patrick, this is
not the way of someone considered 'normal'. I don't pretend to analyze you
but anyone can see that if one simple post can send someone into such a
foaming, frothy dither as you are in, that is not normal. After all, it is
just energized phosphors on a glass plate that has control of you.
Cass
"Patrick Humphrey" <pat...@io.com> wrote in message
news:szkk797...@fnord.io.com...
Patrick Humphrey
>Humphrey: Again, I say that I simply made a post about something that I am
>looking for and for some insane reason and I really do mean 'insane', you
>choose to go mental and start a fight over absolutely nothing.
Poor little Roscoe, such an innocent victim...so, why is it that so many ISPs
have booted you for "absolutely nothing", again?
-PLH, no wonder he's stuck with the ISP of last resort these days
Cass
looking for and for some insane reason and I really do mean 'insane', you
choose to go mental and start a fight over absolutely nothing.
What is it about my post that has such control over your emotions? It seems
very apparent that a simple post can make you revert to childhood insults.
Is your hold on reality that tenuous?
Humphrey: Realize this and drum it into your head, I made a simple post
about an item that I am wanting to buy and you go berserk. Patrick, this is
not the way of someone considered 'normal'. I don't pretend to analyze you
but anyone can see that if one simple post can send someone into such a
foaming, frothy dither as you are in, that is not normal. After all, it is
just energized phosphors on a glass plate that has control of you.
Cass
"Patrick Humphrey" <pat...@io.com> wrote in message
news:szksmnu...@hagbard.io.com...