A [slightly] different approach to 3D Printers

35 views
Skip to first unread message

RogerI...@aol.com

unread,
Jul 7, 2012, 5:46:47 PM7/7/12
to mauim...@googlegroups.com, honolulu-...@googlegroups.com
I have an idea for a slightly different approach to 3D Printing.
 
In conventional 3D printing the printer builds up layer upon layer of material, constructing the entire solid structure as it goes. But suppose that instead of constructing it as a solid, the printer builds up layers so that only the shell of the structure is built. Then, every ten or twenty or thirty layers it fills in the shell with a liquid, perhaps a two-part self-curing epoxy or a UV-curable liquid.
 
I'm thinking that this approach could significantly speed up the overall process and possibly result in a stronger final product.
 
Anyone have a 3D printer they'd be willing to hack in order to give this approach a try? It could be the basis for a new 3D printing technology, maybe even a new company. 
 
- Roger Garrett

Jerry Isdale

unread,
Jul 7, 2012, 6:08:58 PM7/7/12
to mauim...@googlegroups.com, honolulu-...@googlegroups.com
The internal structure of 3d parts is rarely solid.  Generally they are built with a honeycomb or lattice inside.  Many of the tools for creating parts automagically create the lattice from the 3d designs.

Jerry Isdale


Binary Buddha

unread,
Jul 7, 2012, 9:39:01 PM7/7/12
to honolulu-...@googlegroups.com

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

And the purpose of complicating the cuts? I can only see this in
resulting in less resolution of the object at the end.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
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=VldX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Nicole Hori

unread,
Jul 7, 2012, 11:16:35 PM7/7/12
to honolulu-...@googlegroups.com
Roger,

It's a good idea to make composite materials with 3D printing, and I
think this is a tool that has some similarities to what you're
describing. It lets you "print parts and assemblies made of several
materials with different mechanical and physical properties. More than
that, PolyJet Matrix also allows on-demand fabrication of composite
materials, called Digital Materials™."
http://www.objet.com/products/polyjet_matrix_technology/

It would be nice to see this available with the Makerbot too, of
course. I wonder how difficult it would be to modify it?

Also, check out this example of using a 3d printer to print the
negative space.
http://spectrum.ieee.org/tech-talk/biomedical/devices/scientists-create-vascular-network-using-sugar-and-a-3d-printer

Nicole

Bob Matcuk

unread,
Jul 11, 2012, 7:44:32 PM7/11/12
to honolulu-...@googlegroups.com, mauim...@googlegroups.com
Just saw this article about "SLA" 3D printers: http://www.wired.com/design/2012/07/3-d-printers-that-dont-suck/

Looks like the laser printer of the 3D world! Watch the video! Though, the commenters note that they are REALLY slow =(

-Bob

Jerry Isdale

unread,
Jul 11, 2012, 8:38:20 PM7/11/12
to honolulu-...@googlegroups.com, mauim...@googlegroups.com
Strange they call SLA 'new' as that was the first 3d printer back in 1987 time frame.
I did a 1month contract for a startup called 3D Systems back then, helping them get code running for their first laser cured plastic printer.

The patents have expired so now it can show up as a lower cost kit.

Jerry Isdale


Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages