Message from discussion
JAMECO sells Pentium I and II processors. Thoughts?
Received: by 10.59.1.65 with SMTP id be1mr2959787ved.1.1348882581458;
Fri, 28 Sep 2012 18:36:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: hive76-discussion@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.220.148.143 with SMTP id p15ls4062150vcv.9.gmail; Fri, 28 Sep
2012 18:36:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.58.69.11 with SMTP id a11mr2903193veu.30.1348882581045;
Fri, 28 Sep 2012 18:36:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.58.69.11 with SMTP id a11mr2903192veu.30.1348882581029;
Fri, 28 Sep 2012 18:36:21 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <andrew11...@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-vb0-f49.google.com (mail-vb0-f49.google.com [209.85.212.49])
by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id r14si604713vdu.1.2012.09.28.18.36.21
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
Fri, 28 Sep 2012 18:36:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of andrew11...@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.49 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.212.49;
Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of andrew11...@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.49 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=andrew11...@gmail.com; dkim=pass header...@gmail.com
Received: by vbbfo1 with SMTP id fo1so3952626vbb.36
for <hive76-discussion@googlegroups.com>; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 18:36:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:content-type;
bh=orgyQ/E7ZnliGPUXxrkk6iDnpMgjz/IEWIopZAPkMNQ=;
b=iMDxVuncsF6sUB4ncW8o45Xs9yu6YXsMbH0hGEbrhWasd9KoHgNO7FxasGS2SoJNAn
2vJkMDA0a0IEsAXib/HGl1SK+VnQR87bwARJNWthVNtXySclpdkj6lIQRYItWbj+EQZJ
8C7ESIqTnac4SSGN7m1dGc9uDPwOjLhjzLhs+8bcwcykmnegVtukBXCJOEVyhzdXBgTd
M38Oyg0zkDNrOVjNOKHl35rzDX4nHWTmmsibuLlGPCl9lso72q0UeWHVtiybBdJk1XRU
8PWdY2MRG2jej5MyVsl+gDk3/pUXF+tNY5pMN69mNhUugDGEELCUGSOh5ljpilzqh2V8
e10w==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.52.38.40 with SMTP id d8mr4075910vdk.67.1348882580682; Fri, 28
Sep 2012 18:36:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.58.178.164 with HTTP; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 18:36:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.58.178.164 with HTTP; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 18:36:20 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <0dda3153-8d8a-4daa-af22-fda53a39dd55@googlegroups.com>
References: <b31426eb-bfcd-4085-8de7-7777122dd6e3@googlegroups.com>
<CAM4YmZ7Ts+qcLYPMHrFRHnpAadyrY96HhXy=zj3_Kr9s-Z7...@mail.gmail.com>
<4aeedc00-2908-4758-9a38-03e5e2fcbc27@googlegroups.com>
<CAM4YmZ6=9YwM1TKc_JRb4uA4ri=dGE+az75BE=z8jzwamdN...@mail.gmail.com>
<0dda3153-8d8a-4daa-af22-fda53a39dd55@googlegroups.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 21:36:20 -0400
Message-ID: <CA+ce8c=h74ZOWD6Q_n75q6OVxpsgq0CU4BwfDtvosqUvuqZ...@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Hive 76 Discussion] JAMECO sells Pentium I and II processors. Thoughts?
From: andrew sooy <andrew11...@gmail.com>
To: hive76-discussion@googlegroups.com
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec519707710b6fb04cacd338b
--bcaec519707710b6fb04cacd338b
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
For the sewing machine couldn't there be something made like the tape that
plugs in to an ipod to play mp3 on a tape player but to have it hook to a
new computer.
On Sep 28, 2012 6:31 PM, "Doctor" <xxobsolet...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yeah... That all makes sense. I guess it depends on who you are, what you
> have, and what you want and need to do.
>
> On Friday, September 28, 2012 6:03:15 PM UTC-4, Louis Gerbarg wrote:
>>
>> Consumer vs Industrial users have very different requirements. A lot
>> of embedded device are never upgraded. My father runs a manufacturing
>> plant that has "computer controlled" embroidery machines. They are
>> 8086 machines and take 3.5 inch disks that have their patterns on
>> them. The file format of the embroidery designs is directly derived
>> from the magnetic tape readers the original model of the machine had.
>> Yes, if one breaks down it might be a real pita to deal with it, but
>> the incremental cost of upgrading the machines for the last three
>> decades is much higher than that. When something goes wrong they
>> scavenge the boneyard of other machines for parts rotate things
>> around, then go looking for a spare parts to replace whatever they
>> used. If they actually lose the ability to use a machine due to
>> irreplaceable parts they will likely just move to newer more capable
>> machines (they have a few already).
>>
>> For a lot of users stuff working is much more important than anything
>> else, including upgradability. Spending weeks tinkering with a machine
>> to redesign interface boards created 30 years ago is simply not worth
>> the effort of finding some parts on eBay and moving on. Unlike us,
>> those users really don't want to tinker, time spent tinkering is just
>> lost money.
>>
>> Louis
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 10:40 AM, Doctor <xxobso...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > True. I just think it might be a bad idea to stick with obsolete
>> technology
>> > for too long, because an upgrade may be impossible down the line.
>> >
>> >
>> > On Friday, September 28, 2012 10:29:02 AM UTC-4, Louis Gerbarg wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Legacy systems. If you have some old rack mount industrial system
>> >> running a custom piece of DOS (or OS/2 or Xenix) software to control
>> >> industrial hardware you don't want or need to upgrade. If something
>> >> breaks you want to replace it with an exact match instead of having to
>> >> migrate to new hardware including potentially risky ports of software
>> >> you might not even have the source to any more.
>> >>
>> >> On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 9:00 AM, Doctor <xxobso...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> > As I was browsing JAMECO'S catalog, and saw that they have Pentium I
>> and
>> >> > II
>> >> > processors for sale. Then I started to wonder... Why? Do some people
>> >> > still
>> >> > use Pentium processors in computers? Is there a way to use them in a
>> >> > similar
>> >> > fashion to having an Atmega on a board?
>> >> >
>> >> > It's just something odd that I was wondering if anyone else noticed.
>> I
>> >> > brought it up at the hive, but there were only 5 of us to discuss
>> it...
>> >> > Maybe someone else has an idea what to do with a Pentium. Any
>> thoughts?
>> >> >
>> >> > --
>> >> > To post to this group, send email to hive76-d...@googlegroups.com
>> >> > To unsubscribe send email to hive76-discuss...@googlegroups.com
>> >> > For more awesome goto
>> >> > http://groups.google.com/group/hive76-discussion?hl=en
>> >
>> > --
>> > To post to this group, send email to hive76-d...@googlegroups.com
>> > To unsubscribe send email to hive76-discuss...@googlegroups.com
>> > For more awesome goto
>> http://groups.google.com/group/hive76-discussion?hl=en
>>
> --
> To post to this group, send email to hive76-discussion@googlegroups.com
> To unsubscribe send email to
> hive76-discussion+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
> For more awesome goto
> http://groups.google.com/group/hive76-discussion?hl=en
--bcaec519707710b6fb04cacd338b
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<p>For the sewing machine couldn't there be something made like the tap=
e that plugs in to an ipod to play mp3 on a tape player but to have it hook=
to a new computer.</p>
<div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Sep 28, 2012 6:31 PM, "Doctor" <=
<a href=3D"mailto:xxobsolet...@gmail.com">xxobsolet...@gmail.com</a>> wr=
ote:<br type=3D"attribution"><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"mar=
gin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Yeah... That all makes sense. I guess it depends on who you are, what you h=
ave, and what you want and need to do.<br><br>On Friday, September 28, 2012=
6:03:15 PM UTC-4, Louis Gerbarg wrote:<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" st=
yle=3D"margin:0;margin-left:0.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1=
ex">
Consumer vs Industrial users have very different requirements. A lot
<br>of embedded device are never upgraded. My father runs a manufacturing
<br>plant that has "computer controlled" embroidery machines. The=
y are
<br>8086 machines and take 3.5 inch disks that have their patterns on
<br>them. The file format of the embroidery designs is directly derived
<br>from the magnetic tape readers the original model of the machine had.
<br>Yes, if one breaks down it might be a real pita to deal with it, but
<br>the incremental cost of upgrading the machines for the last three
<br>decades is much higher than that. When something goes wrong they
<br>scavenge the boneyard of other machines for parts rotate things
<br>around, then go looking for a spare parts to replace whatever they
<br>used. If they actually lose the ability to use a machine due to
<br>irreplaceable parts they will likely just move to newer more capable
<br>machines (they have a few already).
<br>
<br>For a lot of users stuff working is much more important than anything
<br>else, including upgradability. Spending weeks tinkering with a machine
<br>to redesign interface boards created 30 years ago is simply not worth
<br>the effort of finding some parts on eBay and moving on. Unlike us,
<br>those users really don't want to tinker, time spent tinkering is ju=
st
<br>lost money.
<br>
<br>Louis
<br>
<br>On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 10:40 AM, Doctor <<a>xxobso...@gmail.com</a>=
> wrote:
<br>> True. I just think it might be a bad idea to stick with obsolete t=
echnology
<br>> for too long, because an upgrade may be impossible down the line.
<br>>
<br>>
<br>> On Friday, September 28, 2012 10:29:02 AM UTC-4, Louis Gerbarg wro=
te:
<br>>>
<br>>> Legacy systems. If you have some old rack mount industrial sys=
tem
<br>>> running a custom piece of DOS (or OS/2 or Xenix) software to c=
ontrol
<br>>> industrial hardware you don't want or need to upgrade. If =
something
<br>>> breaks you want to replace it with an exact match instead of h=
aving to
<br>>> migrate to new hardware including potentially risky ports of s=
oftware
<br>>> you might not even have the source to any more.
<br>>>
<br>>> On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 9:00 AM, Doctor <<a>xxobso...@gmail=
.com</a>> wrote:
<br>>> > As I was browsing JAMECO'S catalog, and saw that they=
have Pentium I and
<br>>> > II
<br>>> > processors for sale. Then I started to wonder... Why? Do =
some people
<br>>> > still
<br>>> > use Pentium processors in computers? Is there a way to us=
e them in a
<br>>> > similar
<br>>> > fashion to having an Atmega on a board?
<br>>> >
<br>>> > It's just something odd that I was wondering if anyon=
e else noticed. I
<br>>> > brought it up at the hive, but there were only 5 of us to=
discuss it...
<br>>> > Maybe someone else has an idea what to do with a Pentium.=
Any thoughts?
<br>>> >
<br>>> > --
<br>>> > To post to this group, send email to <a>hive76-d...@googl=
egroups.com</a>
<br>>> > To unsubscribe send email to <a>hive76-discuss...@googleg=
roups.com</a>
<br>>> > For more awesome goto
<br>>> > <a href=3D"http://groups.google.com/group/hive76-discussi=
on?hl=3Den" target=3D"_blank">http://groups.google.com/group/hive76-discuss=
ion?hl=3Den</a>
<br>>
<br>> --
<br>> To post to this group, send email to <a>hive76-d...@googlegroups.c=
om</a>
<br>> To unsubscribe send email to <a>hive76-discuss...@googlegroups.com=
</a>
<br>> For more awesome goto <a href=3D"http://groups.google.com/group/hi=
ve76-discussion?hl=3Den" target=3D"_blank">http://groups.google.com/group/h=
ive76-discussion?hl=3Den</a>
<br></blockquote>
<p></p>
-- <br>
To post to this group, send email to <a href=3D"mailto:hive76-discussion@go=
oglegroups.com" target=3D"_blank">hive76-discussion@googlegroups.com</a><br=
>
To unsubscribe send email to <a href=3D"mailto:hive76-discussion%2Bunsubscr=
ibe@googlegroups.com" target=3D"_blank">hive76-discussion+unsubscribe@googl=
egroups.com</a><br>
For more awesome goto <a href=3D"http://groups.google.com/group/hive76-disc=
ussion?hl=3Den" target=3D"_blank">http://groups.google.com/group/hive76-dis=
cussion?hl=3Den</a></blockquote></div>
--bcaec519707710b6fb04cacd338b--