ALL PRAISE TO MAIMUNA BEGUM !

147 views
Skip to first unread message

Rasht...@aol.com

unread,
Apr 11, 2012, 3:14:47 PM4/11/12
to hind...@gmail.com

HOW FOOLISH OF RSS

(to praise "Indira Gandhi" whose heart was in Islam!)

 

A few years back late Arwind Ghosh of Houston published an article entitled, “RSS, THE PAPER TIGER”. It had enough on the ideological orientation of RSS and their inability & inadequacy to comprehend and meet the threats from  the enemies of Bharat both without and within.

The present praises of “Indira Gandhi” are in line with that disappointing national collapse based on ignorance and a lack of concern for Hindu safety & survival in the future.

INDIRA’s REAL NAME WAS "MAIMUNA BEGUM"

On marrying Feroze Khan of Allahabad Indira acquired the Islamic name Maimuna Begum. Those who declare her husband Feroze to be a Parsi do not tell us the names of his parents, uncles, aunts and first cousins for fear of disclosing his Muslim religion that was concealed for dishonest political reasons.

Maimuna Begum, like a Mogul Empress ruling over the Hindu slaves, was autocratic and lived like an aristocrat. She never conceded any dignity or status to the Hindus. Urdu-English dictionaries published during her reign gave the meaning of the word "Hindu" as "Black", "Negro" or "Thief".

She contemptuously rejected any notion of “Hindu Rashtra” although she fully, and whole-heartedly, accepted as legitimate, legal & logical the Islamic Rashtra of Pakistan on either side of India.

She did not mind Muslim Presidents of Partitioned India like Zakir Hussain, Mohammed Hidayatullah and Fakhruddin nor Maulana Abul Kalam Azad as the Education minister.

She hated the proud Sikhs who could inspire the downtrodden Hindus to reject her bogus Secularism and Imperialism, or even dare to demand one tenth of the autonomy & freedom given by her to East Bengal in 1972.

She was not humble or approachable but arrogant and proud and a deadly killer if things did not go according to her wishes.

She admired the former President of All-India Congress Party, Mohammed Ali Jinnah, and secretly admired his guts and daring to attack and weaken the Infidel nation (India) by creating Pakistan. She had the streak of a JINN in her personality and died appropriately at Hallowe’en in 1984 (the day they used to burn witches across Medieval Europe).

SHE IMPOSED EMERGENCY to crush freedom of expression. How democratic was she?

She did not wish to see the SRI RAM TEMPLE re-built in Ayodhya but frequently drove past the grand Jama Masjid in Delhi, adoring its size and grandeur. She felt relief that NO "mandir" in the Indian capital looked as grand and imposing.

Being a Muslim she had NO respect or regard whatsoever for Sri Ram. Otherwise a woman who could defeat Pakistan in order to liberate Bangladesh for Islam & Mohammed, could also easily get the grand Temple constructed in Ayodhya with all the Hindu SLAVES praising her.

It's a SHAME that the Hindus start praising even the ENEMY but don’t see through the enemy’s designs & intentions for them.

Not once did she visit Nepal to assure the only Hindu Kingdom on earth of her support, or economic aid and even goodwill that she had for Pakistan and Bangladesh.

SHE VICIOUSLY ATTACKED GOLDEN TEMPLE in Amritsar. How secular and tolerant was she? She caused grievous hurt to the Sikh psyche across the whole world and chose the time of attack to coincide with big religious celebration in order to maximise the killings. In the slaves’ tradition of looking the other way when a member of family is killed, RSS did not hold a single protest demonstration against Maimuna Begum’s most malicious, vindictive and diabolical action. Surely, hers was NOT a soft Hindu heart!

She returned East Bengal to the ENEMY after its capture. She did not commend her secularism to Shaikh Mujiburrahman, saying, “Brother, Secularism is only for the Infidels and KAFIRS who are meant to be subjugated, converted or killed.” How much was she committed to Secularism herself?

She never spoke of Bapu Gandhi’s “Akhand Bharat” nor any wish to expel the Muslims from her Broken Bharat. How patriotic was she? She continued giving “Hajj facilities & subsidies” to the Muslims while hammering the Hindus into pulp with her Secularism? 

She became Prime Minister only due to “DIVINE RIGHT” of Nehru to provide prime ministers and rulers in India. RSS and all the Hindu organisations have gone along with this definition of “democracy for dogs” without feeling disgust or guilt.

Yes, SHE BECME PRIME MINISTER ONLY BECAUSE SHE WAS THE DAUGHTER OF NEHRU, AND RAJIV BECAME PM ONY BECAUSE HE, TOO, WAS THE SON OF PRIME MINISTER. And this Dynasty was MUSLIM but now CATHOLIC. None is Hindu. That defines “democracy” in the Coolie Colony of Hindusthan.

Maimuna Begum did NOT stop corruption that was spreading like wild fire under her rule, reaching the climax that we see now. The only difference is that while Nehru, Maimuna and Roberto looted the nation with one hand, Sonia is now looting the nation with BOTH hands. Yes, 70 lakh crore rupees belonging to the people of India are lying in Switzerland banks. This is the highest amount lying outside any country from amongst 180 countries of the world, as if India is the champion of Black Money.

Did she infuse character in her own son Rajiv to refuse bribes and commissions? (The Loafer promptly took $50MILLION from the BOFORS GUN COMPANY OF SWEDEN.)

Nor did she give him the advice, "Son, do NOT bring any worthless brat from Italy or Latin America. The proud and patriotic Hindu nation will beat you into pulp."

Did she encourage her sons to join the armed forces, like the British Royal family, to make a soldier feel proud?

In 1972 we saw her playing the anti India card openly. She betrayed India and degraded the gallant armed forces by NOT using them to liberate North Kashmir promptly after she inflicted a crushing defeat on Pakistan. At the same time she INSULTED our armed forces by using them like mercenaries to capture East Pakistan only to return to ISLAM once again. She made a mockery of Secularism and our brave Jawans’ sacrifices in battlefield.

SHE WELCOMED SONIA, THE SECURITY RISK FROM ITALY, INTO HER RESIDENCE WHERE TOP LEVEL MEETINGS ON STATE AFFAIRS TOOK PLACE.

Where was the top General who ought to have warned her of the foreigner in her house? Where was the Police chief who ought to have BARRED Sonia's entry into Prime Minister's house before she even acquired the Indian passport? Both, the army and the police, were Indira's "despicable dogs" who did not mind a FOREIGNER living in Prime Minister's house.

She could not influence her own son Rajiv to choose a NATIVE bride, preferably a Hindu girl, since she believed that “Indian was inferior”.

She did not mind her son Rajiv placing his head (and the dignity of Hindusthan) at the feet of Sonia Maino, a poor Italian girl who was working as a domestic help (maid) in Cambridge.

Did she ever smile at a Hindu, support a Hindu school or university or encourage the teaching of Hindi and Sanskrit languages? When did she visit Benaras Hindu University and make a donation there, or establish a few more Hindu universities in Bharat or a Chair of Sanskrit Studies in UK or the USA?

Did she raise the quality and standards of a single university in Bharat where her own sons could study instead of going abroad?

Did she raise the standard of a single hospital in Bharat where Sonia could go for treatment instead of rushing to America?

Did she look towards the Buddhist countries to the East for closer cultural exchanges and invite the Japanese, Koreans, Chinese, Vietnamese and the Thais to come to Bharat to visit the holy places connected with Mahatma Buddha? NOT AT ALL!

Did she declare AYODHYA and AMRITSAR free & sovereign cities like The Vatican in Italy? NOT AT ALL.

Did she ever sit down with a Shankaracharya to discuss the state of Hindu temples?

How did she project or propagate India’s own native religions at home and abroad?

Did she notice the degradation and persecution of the Hindus in Sindh, East Bengal, West Punjab, and even South Kashmir?

Did she restrict the Christians and the Muslims from converting the Hindus?

Did she ever send a Hindu ambassador to Riyadh while accepting only Muslim ambassadors from Bangladesh, Pakistan and Saudi Arabia?

WHEN DID SHE ASK THE ARMY GENERAL TO RECOVER NORTH KASHMIR FROM HER "FIRST COUSINS"  (THE PAKISTANIS)? 

Why did she not abolish Article 370 in Constitution that favours the MUSLIM MAJORITY State of Jammu & Kashmir but NOT any other State?

Who were the “terrorists” that she was allegedly chasing? Definitely they were NOT the Muslims who had terrorised the whole of India to take out PAKISTAN and then exterminate the Hindus there?

What did Maimuna Begum (Indira) do to ensure the safety of Hindus in East Bengal and Sindh and South Kashmir?

What did she do to stop the Muslims seducing, raping, abducting and CONVERTING Hindu girls to Islam?

What was her input in educating and integrating the jobless poor Maoists and the starving Naxalites instead of persecuting and crushing them like the Moguls, thus forcing them to become terrorists or rather, freedom fighters?

Did she not train the TAMIL TIGERS in camps in Tamil Nadu, only to be exterminated by the combined Sri Lankan and Indian forces later?

FOR THIS ALONE, THE TAMILS OUGHT TO HAVE ASSASSINATED MAIMUNA BEGUM (INDIRA) OR HER SON ROBERTO (RAJIV).

In fact they did just that!  WELL DONE!

Why did she exempt the Muslims from stringent “family planning” measures that were enforced vigorously on the Hindus and the Sikhs?

SHAME on our ignorance and collective cowardice in NOT facing the reality and facts. RSS ought to have noticed the Hindus being "BASHED" by Dynasty- from Nehru to Rahul, all the time.

If not RSS (and VHP), who will educate, inform and inspire the Hindus and make them a formidable COUNER FORCE against the rising Islamic threat in our bleeding broken Bharat? Who will ask, “What are the Muslims doing in Partitioned India?” Who will expose the Dynasty who are using the Fifth Column as a shield for their own protection? Who will demand a “post mortem” on Partition, the worst disaster in entire Indian history?

Why is the Hindu nation so imbecile, timid or ignorant as to say, “O Nehru, you may surrender all of Western and Eastern India we will still love you!”

“O Bapu Gandhi, you may call our killers and murderers in West Punjab, Kashmir and East Bengal our “brothers” and your “children”, and also embrace them in Broken Bharat, but we will still call you “Mahatma” and worship you.”

“O Indira, you may be Maimuna Begum but we will still call you “Indira” to make the “WITCH” seem like a “GODDESS”. You may declare emergency and lock us up but we will still call you democrat. You may give them Hujj subsidies and key posts of cabinet ministers and keep Article 370 in Constitution and respectfully go past the flags of Pakistan and Bangladesh in New Delhi, but we will still call you secular and patriot.

“O Roberto (Rajiv), you can contemptuously reject on all the Indian girls but import one from Italy and make her the First Lady of Bharat, and take commission from BOFORS, but we will still call you “Desh Bhagat” and Mr. Clean!”

“O RSS, you praise Maimuna Begum knowing well that she was the real TERRORIST who ruled with an iron hand, squeezed the wealth of Hindu temples and put the Hindus on the way to extinction, but you still praise her!”

What a shame that RSS, that is supposed to EXPOSE those who surrendered five provinces of Bharat unconditionally to the ENEMY, is praising the daughter of “dirty” dynasty, throwing leaderless Hindusthan’s future to PERIL.

 

kuru

11/04/12

 ==============

In a message dated 10/04/2012 23:44:46 GMT Daylight Time, patil_...@yahoo.com writes: 

And, what alternative solutions RSS leaders had for Kandahar ?

Or, what they have if similar one repeats in the future ?

--------------------

From: Ashok Chowgule (ChGoa) <ash...@chowgulegoa.com>

To: Ashok Chowgule (ChGoa) <ash...@chowgulegoa.com>

Sent: Monday, April 9, 2012 9:00 PM

Subject: [media_monitor5] RSS praises Indira Gandhi for stand against terror

RSS praises Indira Gandhi for stand against terror

Author: Press Trust of India

Publication: IBNLive.com

Date: April 7, 2012

URL: http://ibnlive.in.com/news/rss-praises-indira-gandhi-for-stand-against-terror/246726-3.html

RSS has praised late Indira Gandhi as the only one who had stood her ground against terror while it took a dig at BJP's Jaswant Singh for accompanying Kashmiri terrorists to secure the release of a planeload of Indian hostages.

In its editorial on the current hostage crisis in Odisha, RSS mouthpiece Organiser has said neither the Centre nor the states have a "well-defined policy" on kidnapping and hostage-prisoner swap.

"While Indira Gandhi as Prime Minister in 1984 went ahead and hanged Maqbool Bhat when the Kashmiri terrorists held the 48-year-old Indian diplomat Ravindra Mhatre as hostage. He was killed by the terrorists. Since then there has hardly ever been any instance when the government stood its ground," the editorial in latest edition of Organiser said.

It has cited examples where the government of the day bowed before the terrorists in a hostage situation.

"At Kandahar in 1999, the Indian Foreign Minister Jaswant Singh accompanied top Kashmiri terrorists to secure the release of a planeload of Indians," the mouthpiece said.

The article also mentions the Rubaiya Sayeed case, where the daughter of the then Home Minister Mufti Mohammad Sayeed, was kidnapped in 1989 by Kashmiri extremists and the government of India had yielded.

The RSS mouthpiece insists that Maoists have used kidnapping successfully as a means not just for securing the release of its cadres but also to gain breathing time for "recouping and regrouping".

The article maintains that a "well-thought out strategy" needs to be put in place to convey that India is not a weak state, failing which the whole anti-terror campaign would become a joke.

 =====================================================

 

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages