Next HNO
Daniel MacKay
bad (which by the way most polyamory people would say is toxic analysis
- a relationship just *is* it's not good or bad)
... speaking of getting together for a sasparilla, is anyone planning
the first HNO of 2010? Should I plan it? For a Tuesday - Wednesday
evening at the Lion's Head, some time in January or February sort of
thing?
--
Daniel MacKay
Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
santos
"Daniel MacKay" <dan...@bonmot.ca> wrote in message
news:daniel-6CBD5C.18110502012010@[74.223.185.199.nw.nuvox.net]...
why a tuesday or wed? on thursday they have cheap hot wings :p
santos
Daniel MacKay
Because
(a) you can't please everyone and
(b) the HNO that *you* plan can be on a Y :-)
Richard Bonner
> "Daniel MacKay" <dan...@bonmot.ca> wrote:
> > ... speaking of getting together for a sasparilla, is anyone planning
> > the first HNO of 2010? Should I plan it? For a Tuesday - Wednesday
> > evening at the Lion's Head, some time in January or February sort of
> > thing?
> >
> > --
> > Daniel MacKay
> why a tuesday or wed? on thursday they have cheap hot wings :p
> santos
*** Too crowded and hard to get enough seats together on a night like
that.
Count me in if it's not the first or last Tuesday of the month.
Richard
Daniel MacKay
what number would it be?
Daniel MacKay
Donna Whitman <NSBoo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Count me in. Haven't been to one in a while so I'm overdue.
Awesome! Now - would it be HNO XVIII or XX or XXVI or what?
lucretia
wrote:
>In article <fk9ck5pm5llvpuhnb...@4ax.com>,
> Donna Whitman <NSBoo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 07 Jan 2010 18:11:11 GMT, Daniel MacKay <dan...@bonmot.ca>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >IF we were going to have a HNO on, say, February 10th at suppertime,
>> >what number would it be?
>>
>>
>> Count me in. Haven't been to one in a while so I'm overdue.
>
>Awesome! Now - would it be HNO XVIII or XX or XXVI or what?
Definitely XXVI - I fired up the old computer to check.
Richard Bonner
> >> On Thu, 07 Jan 2010 18:11:11 GMT, Daniel MacKay <dan...@bonmot.ca>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> I think XXVI but perhaps RB can confirm.
*** I would have to look in my archives. Even that would not be
accurate because some of those seudo HNOs may or may not have been
counted.
Richard
Ian C
"Richard Bonner" <ak...@chebucto.ns.ca> wrote in message
news:hi7qi8$m80$9...@Kil-nws-1.UCIS.Dal.Ca...
seudo? Literacy is slipping again
Ian
Richard Bonner
Richard Bonner
> On Fri, 08 Jan 2010 18:34:29 GMT, "Ian C" <no_...@eastlink.ca> wrote:
> >"Richard Bonner" <ak...@chebucto.ns.ca> wrote:
> >news:hi7qi8$m80$9...@Kil-nws-1.UCIS.Dal.Ca...
> >> lucreti...@fl.it wrote:
> >>> >> On Thu, 07 Jan 2010 18:11:11 GMT, Daniel MacKay <dan...@bonmot.ca>
> >>> >> wrote:
> >>> >>
> >>> >> >IF we were going to have a HNO what number would it be?
> >>
> >>> I think XXVI but perhaps RB can confirm.
> >>
> >> *** I would have to look in my archives. Even that would not be
> >> accurate because some of those seudo HNOs may or may not have been
> >> counted.
> >>
> >> Richard
> I'm not sure which "pseudo" HNO's Richard is referring to. :-)
*** There were some get-togethers at odd times that were done to
accomodate visitors.
> What's the point of numbering them anyway? If that's done, we'd have
> to go WAAAAY back because I attended NG gatherings back in the late
> 90's.
*** Those are included in the number scheme.
Richard
Ian C
"Donna Whitman" <NSBoo...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:nedfk55vt1kacr12s...@4ax.com...
>
> to go WAAAAY back because I attended NG gatherings back in the late
> 90's.
>
> name.
>
>
I doubt it Donna but you never know
Ian