HermiT 1.3.6 implements some support for incremental reasoning, but
the procedure wasn't prepared for the case when you incrementally add
class assertions with a class name that didn't occur in your ontology
before. I fixed this now and the next nightly build should work as
expected
Best regards,
Birte
--
Jun. Prof. Dr. Birte Glimm Tel.: +49 731 50 24125
Inst. of Artificial Intelligence Secr: +49 731 50 24258
University of Ulm Fax: +49 731 50 24188
D-89069 Ulm birte...@uni-ulm.de
Germany
Hi Philipp,
sorry for that. It seems that I indeed didn't fix the bug completely.
I found and corrected the mistake and added a lot more test cases to
our own test repository that should cover all kinds of changes (adding
axioms to non-existing ontologies or adding axioms with fresh names in
all kinds of combinations). This should be available with the next
nightly build as usual.
> Should i post this in some bugtracker system?
We do have a google code issue tracker at
http://code.google.com/p/hermit-reasoner/issues/list, which can be
used to report bugs. This makes it easier for us to track who is
reasponsible for dealing with a bug and when the bug is fixed. Feel
free to add your report there, although I hope it is all fixed now.
Cheers,
Birte
--