The
Lost Art Of Critical Thinking: Part 1 -- A
Broad Stroke
To
promote campus-wide dialogue and “a shared
intellectual experience,” seventy-nine out
of one hundred of our top American
universities ask their incoming freshmen to
read one designated book over the summer. The
exercise promises to stimulate abstract
thinking by posing questions like “What is
meant by what was read?” or “How does this
fit with what I already know?” Problem
is participating students read no works of
classical antiquity, no classical works of
Christian or Jewish thought, science, or
history. Instead, incoming freshmen typically
read books that feature “quick impressions,
snappy ideas, or empathetic evoking of
misfortune.” Some even read comic books
(called “graphic novels”) that tend to be
“short, caffeinated, and emotional” in
words of NAS President Peter Wood. Speaking
of which, the National Association of Scholars
(NAS) examined some 180 books selected by 290
participating schools only to find that many
choices relaxed into liberal biases and did
little to stretch demands of college-level
study. Rather than foster mastery of
fact acquisition, fluency, maintenance,
expansion, and reasoned application, students
instead read emotive books featuring the
“politics of change” (psycho-politics)
“with a distinctly disaffected view of
American society and Western civilization.”