I agree this should be clarified. The member tiers were defined in the
bylaws before, but were since moved to the Rules which are here:
http://wiki.heatsynclabs.org/wiki/Rules#Membership_Tiers (you can also view
the wiki history to confirm.) We created the Associate tier literally as a
way to support us without spending $50/mo. We asked if people wanted to pay
$25/mo for essentially nothing in return, and people said yes (they want to
contribute.)
My understanding of the HYH vote was that it applied to the HYH vote only,
and not board elections. I could be mistaken; let's discuss. (There are
only about ten $25 members, most of whom aren't very active, compared to 70
basic+ members. If you're a $25 member and want to vote, please yell loudly
right now! Voter suppression is not the goal!)
I'm in favor of either (a) renaming Associate Member to just Associate, or
"Friend of HeatSync " to avoid confusion, or (b) adjusting the rules so
that all >$25/mo member tiers get a vote on board elections. There are
advantages and disadvantages to both. A: people like the word "member." Not
a single person has ever used the $1, $5, or $10/mo sponsorship options
right below the membership options. B: If you have $250, now you can buy 10
votes and win by a landslide. (Minimum membership term requirements?)
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 3:57 PM, Brian Aday <projecti...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Our Bylaws say *Members* can vote in board elections, and *Associate
> Membership* is membership.
> bylaws before, but were since moved to the Rules which are here:
> http://wiki.heatsynclabs.org/wiki/Rules#Membership_Tiers (you can also
> view the wiki history to confirm.) *The rules (and bylaws before them)
> don't give board voting privileges to the Associate tier.* We created the
> Associate tier literally as a way to support us without spending $50/mo. We
> asked if people wanted to pay $25/mo for essentially nothing in return, and
> people said yes (they want to contribute.)
Non-member: Can be in the lab as a guest of a member, and use the equipment that way. Can be asked to leave at any time.
Associate member -Can be in the lab and use the equipment, -Gets member discounts on classes -Can not have 24hr access or vote (although now they can vote in HYH).
Full Member: Everything an associate member gets plus the opportunity for 24hr access and the right to vote.
As someone who only makes it up to the lab every few weeks/months, this suits my needs fine. I don't care for the politics (although if there's a problem I'll try to do something about it), so I don't get excited about voting. If I decide I want to vote, I'll change from the $25 to the $50 membership.
On Thursday, October 11, 2012 4:19:54 PM UTC-7, Will Bradley wrote:
> I agree this should be clarified. The member tiers were defined in the > bylaws before, but were since moved to the Rules which are here: > http://wiki.heatsynclabs.org/wiki/Rules#Membership_Tiers (you can also > view the wiki history to confirm.) We created the Associate tier literally > as a way to support us without spending $50/mo. We asked if people wanted > to pay $25/mo for essentially nothing in return, and people said yes (they > want to contribute.)
> My understanding of the HYH vote was that it applied to the HYH vote only, > and not board elections. I could be mistaken; let's discuss. (There are > only about ten $25 members, most of whom aren't very active, compared to 70 > basic+ members. If you're a $25 member and want to vote, please yell loudly > right now! Voter suppression is not the goal!)
> I'm in favor of either (a) renaming Associate Member to just Associate, or > "Friend of HeatSync " to avoid confusion, or (b) adjusting the rules so > that all >$25/mo member tiers get a vote on board elections. There are > advantages and disadvantages to both. A: people like the word "member." Not > a single person has ever used the $1, $5, or $10/mo sponsorship options > right below the membership options. B: If you have $250, now you can buy 10 > votes and win by a landslide. (Minimum membership term requirements?)
> On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 3:57 PM, Brian Aday <proje...@gmail.com<javascript:> > > wrote:
>> Our Bylaws say *Members* can vote in board elections, and *Associate >> Membership* is membership.