<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
  <title>hddm-users Google Group</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/hddm-users</link>
  <description>HDDM user discussion group. HDDM is a python toolkit to fit Drift Diffusion Models to reaction times using Hierarchical Bayesian estimation (via PyMC). https://github.com/hddm-devs/hddm</description>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
  <title>Re: [hddm-users] hddm instalation problem</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/hddm-users/browse_thread/thread/7c89b35871dfa541/7e14716f0d5c0dde?show_docid=7e14716f0d5c0dde</link>
  <description>
  Did you install cython? &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Thomas
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/hddm-users/browse_thread/thread/7c89b35871dfa541/7e14716f0d5c0dde?show_docid=7e14716f0d5c0dde</guid>
  <author>
  thomas.wie...@gmail.com
  (Thomas Wiecki)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 19:44:08 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: [hddm-users] hddm instalation problem</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/hddm-users/browse_thread/thread/7c89b35871dfa541/df179bf48b823d82?show_docid=df179bf48b823d82</link>
  <description>
  Hi Thomas, &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Still not working. I&#39;m sorry for all the trouble, here is the new log. Any &lt;br&gt; ideas what might be wrong? &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Best
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/hddm-users/browse_thread/thread/7c89b35871dfa541/df179bf48b823d82?show_docid=df179bf48b823d82</guid>
  <author>
  andrecr...@gmail.com
  (Andre Cravo)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 18:39:50 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: [hddm-users] hddm instalation problem</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/hddm-users/browse_thread/thread/7c89b35871dfa541/3953ac6fc94d1779?show_docid=3953ac6fc94d1779</link>
  <description>
  This same error happened with python x,y: &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!topic/hddm-users/DNRVgEsReno&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/hddm-users/browse_thread/thread/7c89b35871dfa541/3953ac6fc94d1779?show_docid=3953ac6fc94d1779</guid>
  <author>
  thomas.wie...@gmail.com
  (Thomas Wiecki)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 12:03:42 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: [hddm-users] hddm instalation problem</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/hddm-users/browse_thread/thread/7c89b35871dfa541/0ca9b15fbdf71080?show_docid=0ca9b15fbdf71080</link>
  <description>
  This is the problem: &lt;br&gt; build\temp.win32-2.7\Release\s rc\cdfdif_wrapper.o:cdfdif_wra pper.c:(.text+0x6133): &lt;br&gt; undefined reference to `imp(char, double, float, double, int, float)&#39; &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;It might be a Cython problem, can you try installing that and then &lt;br&gt; reinstall hddm? &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Thomas
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/hddm-users/browse_thread/thread/7c89b35871dfa541/0ca9b15fbdf71080?show_docid=0ca9b15fbdf71080</guid>
  <author>
  thomas.wie...@gmail.com
  (Thomas Wiecki)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 12:01:49 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: [hddm-users] hddm instalation problem</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/hddm-users/browse_thread/thread/7c89b35871dfa541/c00de7e57d4f81fc?show_docid=c00de7e57d4f81fc</link>
  <description>
  Hi Thomas, &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Thanks for your help. I have tried to use Anaconda and it solves part of &lt;br&gt; the problem. But now I have a different problem. I have been able to &lt;br&gt; install all other packages (kabuki, pandas and all). However, when I try: &lt;br&gt; pip install hddm I get: &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Command C:\Anaconda\python.exe -c &amp;quot;import
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/hddm-users/browse_thread/thread/7c89b35871dfa541/c00de7e57d4f81fc?show_docid=c00de7e57d4f81fc</guid>
  <author>
  andrecr...@gmail.com
  (Andre Cravo)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 01:22:47 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: [hddm-users] hddm instalation problem</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/hddm-users/browse_thread/thread/7c89b35871dfa541/e7603720b5591475?show_docid=e7603720b5591475</link>
  <description>
  It seems you can also locate distutils.cfg and change the compile to &lt;br&gt; mingw32: &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;I had a similar problem with a package (Traits) a couple of weeks ago - for &lt;br&gt; me it was because the package was trying to compile extensions and I didn&#39;t &lt;br&gt; have Visual Studio. What worked for me was to install &lt;br&gt; MinGW&amp;lt;&lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://tdm-gcc.tdragon.net/&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;&amp;gt; and
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/hddm-users/browse_thread/thread/7c89b35871dfa541/e7603720b5591475?show_docid=e7603720b5591475</guid>
  <author>
  thomas.wie...@gmail.com
  (Thomas Wiecki)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 11:35:18 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: [hddm-users] hddm instalation problem</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/hddm-users/browse_thread/thread/7c89b35871dfa541/bf398bc7ef625f33?show_docid=bf398bc7ef625f33</link>
  <description>
  Hi Andre, &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;That&#39;s rather odd, EPD should use mingw, not visual studio. You can try to &lt;br&gt; install Visual Studio (there&#39;s a free version) manually and see whether &lt;br&gt; that works. Alternatively you might want to try Anaconda by Continuum &lt;br&gt; instead of EPD. &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Anyone else with windows experience that knows anything?
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/hddm-users/browse_thread/thread/7c89b35871dfa541/bf398bc7ef625f33?show_docid=bf398bc7ef625f33</guid>
  <author>
  thomas.wie...@gmail.com
  (Thomas Wiecki)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 11:30:05 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>hddm instalation problem</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/hddm-users/browse_thread/thread/7c89b35871dfa541/5402daac2f05ed51?show_docid=5402daac2f05ed51</link>
  <description>
  Hello, &lt;br&gt; I am trying to install hddm on windows 7 (32-Bits). I have downloaded and &lt;br&gt; installed Enthought Python Distribution (EPD). &lt;br&gt; I have also been able to install kabuki. &lt;br&gt; However, when I try to install hddm I get the following error: &lt;br&gt; error: Unable to find vcvarsall.bat &lt;br&gt; I am sending the full log attached. Would somebody know the solution to
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/hddm-users/browse_thread/thread/7c89b35871dfa541/5402daac2f05ed51?show_docid=5402daac2f05ed51</guid>
  <author>
  andrecr...@gmail.com
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 01:48:28 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: [hddm-users] Quantile Optimization</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/hddm-users/browse_thread/thread/a975a6863b75fd7f/71be96d2111e1feb?show_docid=71be96d2111e1feb</link>
  <description>
  Imri, Michael, and EJ, &lt;br&gt; Thank you for the feedback. I know that BIC is known to overpenalize, but &lt;br&gt; also that DIC can have the opposite problem. Thus, using a more &lt;br&gt; conservative criterion measure (like BIC) to compare models seemed like a &lt;br&gt; nice way to ensure that more complex models were truly fitting the data
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/hddm-users/browse_thread/thread/a975a6863b75fd7f/71be96d2111e1feb?show_docid=71be96d2111e1feb</guid>
  <author>
  dunov...@gmail.com
  (DunovanK)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 20:59:56 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: [hddm-users] Quantile Optimization</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/hddm-users/browse_thread/thread/a975a6863b75fd7f/b3d76949c6e4d3f8?show_docid=b3d76949c6e4d3f8</link>
  <description>
  EJ, I defer to you on these issues. (I&#39;ve been thinking a lot about model &lt;br&gt; selection and bayes factors etc lately so I hope to be able to chat with &lt;br&gt; you about this when in NL in June!) &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;My understanding of the Stephan paper was that rather than assuming that &lt;br&gt; there is one model that generates the data for all subjects (as in group BF
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/hddm-users/browse_thread/thread/a975a6863b75fd7f/b3d76949c6e4d3f8?show_docid=b3d76949c6e4d3f8</guid>
  <author>
  michael_fr...@brown.edu
  (Michael J Frank)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 17:35:23 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: [hddm-users] Quantile Optimization</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/hddm-users/browse_thread/thread/a975a6863b75fd7f/f3fbebb5ef3e244e?show_docid=f3fbebb5ef3e244e</link>
  <description>
  My two cents: I never understood the Stephan paper. At best it tells you &lt;br&gt; something about the average evidence across subjects. However, what one &lt;br&gt; likes to know is the overall evidence. If every subject contributes a &lt;br&gt; little evidence for H1, and you have many subjects, you need to end up with &lt;br&gt; a lot of evidence for H1. Evidence tends to sum or multiply, not average.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/hddm-users/browse_thread/thread/a975a6863b75fd7f/f3fbebb5ef3e244e?show_docid=f3fbebb5ef3e244e</guid>
  <author>
  ej.wagenmak...@gmail.com
  (Eric-Jan Wagenmakers)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 15:20:37 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: [hddm-users] Quantile Optimization</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/hddm-users/browse_thread/thread/a975a6863b75fd7f/a266a5339e63b6b3?show_docid=a266a5339e63b6b3</link>
  <description>
  I agree with Imri about BIC, but just add one bit about your question re: &lt;br&gt; combining individual BIC scores to obtain a group level BIC. A nice paper &lt;br&gt; for this is &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Bayesian model selection for group studies. &lt;br&gt; Stephan KE, Penny WD, Daunizeau J, Moran RJ, Friston KJ. &lt;br&gt; Neuroimage. 2009 Jul 15;46(4):1004-17.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/hddm-users/browse_thread/thread/a975a6863b75fd7f/a266a5339e63b6b3?show_docid=a266a5339e63b6b3</guid>
  <author>
  michael_fr...@brown.edu
  (Michael J Frank)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 14:49:21 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: [hddm-users] Quantile Optimization</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/hddm-users/browse_thread/thread/a975a6863b75fd7f/c27d69d819b938c7?show_docid=c27d69d819b938c7</link>
  <description>
  Hi Kyle, &lt;br&gt; honestly I don&#39;t remember the whole theory behind the optimization scores, &lt;br&gt; just that their is a close connection between G^2 and BIC. So I cannot &lt;br&gt; fully answer your question. &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;I can tell you that you should take the BIC score with a huge chunk of salt. &lt;br&gt; BIC complexity penalty just count the number of parameters, it does not
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/hddm-users/browse_thread/thread/a975a6863b75fd7f/c27d69d819b938c7?show_docid=c27d69d819b938c7</guid>
  <author>
  imriso...@gmail.com
  (Imri Sofer)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 12:37:02 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: [hddm-users] Error in saving model</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/hddm-users/browse_thread/thread/cb3c5522e1df98e3/062f48446ba79400?show_docid=062f48446ba79400</link>
  <description>
  Hello Thomas, &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;I always appreciate your kind advices. &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;I have done the two trials. &lt;br&gt; 1. I can save&amp;amp;load without any error or warning message. &lt;br&gt; 2. I can save with warning message &amp;quot;WARNING: Will not save custom link &lt;br&gt; functions.&amp;quot; and can load with warning message &amp;quot;WARNING: Custom link &lt;br&gt; functions will not be loaded.&amp;quot;.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/hddm-users/browse_thread/thread/cb3c5522e1df98e3/062f48446ba79400?show_docid=062f48446ba79400</guid>
  <author>
  mmasaki1...@gmail.com
  (Maruyama Masaki)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 12:28:08 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: [hddm-users] Quantile Optimization</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/hddm-users/browse_thread/thread/a975a6863b75fd7f/e96cd0ee2da74a79?show_docid=e96cd0ee2da74a79</link>
  <description>
  Hi Thomas, &lt;br&gt; I&#39;m finding the quantile optimization to be a very useful tool for testing &lt;br&gt; out potential model configurations before fitting them to the data with &lt;br&gt; Hierarchical MCMC (which, as you&#39;ve mentioned, takes a much longer time to &lt;br&gt; estimate). In tinkering with the various fitting methods (X2, G2, MLE),
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/hddm-users/browse_thread/thread/a975a6863b75fd7f/e96cd0ee2da74a79?show_docid=e96cd0ee2da74a79</guid>
  <author>
  dunov...@gmail.com
  (DunovanK)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 00:30:10 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
