Did they not have a handout? Did you check the file to see if we have
Mr. Blain's handout for that assignment?
As a guess, if it's a comparative assignment, well -- then, they need
to define shared criteria (imagery, figures of speech, voice, stanza
types, rhyme, theme, etc.) and focus on comparing/contrasting -- what
would it mean to compare them, but to analyze them separately?
You might also take a look at the textbook: there should be a section
on comparative analysis. But generally, to compare anything means to
define two categories: items and criteria. The items are simply the
things being compared (poems, in this case; or, poems and songs, but
under the broader shared category of "verse," let's say). The criteria
are the categories within which the two items, no matter how different
they might be, share something: A book is like a brick in being more
or less rectangular; by the criterion of shape, they are similar. By
the criterion of function, they are (usually) different.
So: help students define the criteria, and choose the ones of
significance to the overall purpose. Theme -- "love," perhaps, or
something more specific. Imagery; level of complexity; repetition;
anything that they share at the categorical level.
Usually (depending on the professor, really) the essay's focus should
be more toward ultimate similarity as an argument, or more toward
ultimate difference. It depends on the goal or purpose: One might want
to argue that the best song lyrics can work as stand-alone works, like
poems, or not. So, what makes some lyrics similar to some poems, which
these days we usually think of as not being sung to music?
Also, in terms of structure and organization: there are two basic
ways: organize by item, moving back and forth sentence by sentence
from one criterion to the next, then do the same for Item 2; or,
organize at the paragraph level by criteria: Item A is like this
according to the criterion of theme, whereas Item B is like that...
We have handbooks and other texts that discuss these patterns, but
it's fairly simple. C/C is a good way to teach about cohesiveness and
transitions. (Cohesiveness: how sentences work together toward a
shared purpose. It's related to paragraph unity, and coherence, which
is more about the linear, sentence-to-sentence clarity).
I'm sure Rob will clarify, when he's available.
On Nov 12, 11:26 am, Shannon Stoney <
shannonsto...@frontiernet.net>
wrote: