What does that tell you about Liberals in America ?
It speaks volumes.
"alohacyberian" <alohac...@att.net> wrote in message
news:5t07f.490630$5N3.1...@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
----------------------------------------
I am using the free version of SPAMfighter for private users.
It has removed 443 spam emails to date.
Paying users do not have this message in their emails.
Try www.SPAMfighter.com for free now!
Steyn added: "Teachers at schools within sight of the World Trade Center in
New York reported that, as the towers burned, many Muslim students were
taking pictures: it seemed odd that so many of them happened to have brought
their cameras to school on that particular day."
Johann Hari wrote in response to this: "Steyn cites only the "evidence" of a
disgraced and sacked journalist on a suburban New York paper, and even that
is for just one of several "facts" that he cites. Steyn did not even bother
to try to back up his claim that Muslim students were taking photographs of
the attacked buildings. I selected seven schools in New York City at random
and called them; they all agreed that the idea was, in the words of one
secretary, "horse shit".
"alohacyberian" <alohac...@att.net> wrote in message
news:5t07f.490630$5N3.1...@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
Lie lie lie
Remember that ed. cartoon of the man holding
a child's body as the airstrike goes on behind
him, say "I don't know how much more Democracy
we can stand"
> Remember that ed. cartoon of the man holding
> a child's body as the airstrike goes on behind
> him, say "I don't know how much more Democracy
> we can stand"
>
Remember the women pulled off the streets nightly by Uday and Qusay's
rape squads?
You liberals are a hard-hearted, hateful, sick lot.
>It's not about what we diehards or the media whine-hards think any more.
>Peripheral though they may be to the concerns of the peace crowd, it is in
>the end about the Iraqi people.
>[...]
>Whatever the Americans got wrong, they got one big thing right: that, if you
>persevered, Iraq had the potential to function as a free society in a part of
>the world where no such thing existed. That was a long shot and much sneered
>at. But Washington judged correctly: given the radicalisation of the Arab
>world, and the Arabification of the Islamic world, and the Islamification of
>much of the rest of the world, in the end you have to fix the problem at
>source.
>[...]
>Pushing back the Islamists on their ever-expanding margins will never be
>enough. Reforming the heart of the Muslim world just may.
> ~ Mark Steyn, "Welcome progress in ending a psycho state", _The Australian_,
>October 19, 2005,
>http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,5744,16961618%255E7583,00.html
Quit crying, alohabitch. Bush will be out of office probably BEFORE
2008
Only if he spends December in Crawford...
Bush has spent more time on vacation than any president. Cheney and
Rove don't really need him getting in the way.
As a revolutionary democritist, I can only hope for the success of
democracy.
While I believe that in a country as large as ours, there is somone who
thinks that way, they are such a small number and promote such a ridiculous
notion, that they can be considered inconsequential.
> What does that tell you about Liberals in America ?
> It speaks volumes.
Absolutely nothing. Since the people you speak of are radicals, not
liberals.
It's good to be well rested.
> As a revolutionary democritist,
Puleeeze....
So why are they al clustered in the uselessnet?
>>What does that tell you about Liberals in America ?
>>It speaks volumes.
>
>
> Absolutely nothing. Since the people you speak of are radicals, not
> liberals.
The same thought continuum really.
>Bleedi...@dc.not wrote:
>> On Mon, 24 Oct 2005 22:55:43 GMT, directory <n...@dll.run> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Bleedi...@dc.not wrote:
>>>
>>>>Bush will be out of office probably BEFORE
>>>>2008
>>>
>>>Only if he spends December in Crawford...
>>
>>
>> Bush has spent more time on vacation than any president.
>
>It's good to be well rested.
like your brain, unused.
Unlike your overwrought walnut sized thought organ.
If not in this country then perhaps somewhere else?
--
-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-
Eskimo North Linux Friendly Shells, Web Hosting, 56K/ISDN/DSL, 2-Week Trial!
Internet access with real toll-free human help as low as $9.00 / month!
See our web site: http://www.eskimo.com/ (206) 812-0051 or (800) 246-6874.
You're describing your overwrought walnut sized sex organ, TRAITOR.
You to a "t".
But, the Liberals in America will be the last to know what it says about
them. That's on the one hand and on the other hand the ones who hold the
above convictions the strongest are going to shout in the loudest in protest
to claim that no on believes that way! It's hilarious! KM
"I think it's time to drop the infernal nonsense about liberals being
well-intentioned but misguided. In the spirit of Hannityesque magnanimity, I
will say that there is only one thing wrong with liberals: They're no good."
~ Ann Coulter
"Liberals' other new hobby is call people 'liars'. After years of defending
Clinton, they love the piquant irony of calling Bush a 'liar'. '_Bush said he
was a "reformer with results" -- LIAR!' For fifty years liberals have called
Republicans every name in the book--idiots, fascists, anti-Semites, racists,
crooks, Constitution shredders, and masterminds of Salvadoran death squads.
Only recently have they added the epithet, 'liar". Even noted ethicist Al
Franken has switched from calling conservatives 'big fat idiots' to calling
them 'liars'. This is virgin territory for Democrats--they never before
viewed lying as a negative. The past president, Bill Clinton, was called "an
unusually good liar" by a senator in his own party, and their last vice
president, Al Gore, couldn't say 'pass the salt' without claiming to have
invented salt. Having only recently discovered the intriguing new concept of
'lies', the Democrats are having a jolly old time calling Bush a liar. But,
they can't quite grasp the concept of a lie as connoting something that is
intentionally untrue--or untrue at all."
~ Ann Coulter
Don't you ever get tired of this kind of post??
Honestly Keith, and I say this out of concern, you lack credibility. I'd be
happy
to help you, as I hold no personal grudge. But you spend sooooo much time
beating the same drum that it utterly eliminates any communicable qualities.
Is it my imagination, or are the words elite, leftwing, mainstream, liberal
ALL
missing in this response!! Amazing. Time to get a lottery ticket.
Is that why you're on him all the time, post after post?
You're a rank peurile HYPOCRITE - begone!
Yes it is, now shove off you lightweight leftist troll.
Don't you ever offer rational rebuttals to the topic under discussion, i.e.,
messages instead of attacking messengers? Of course not, you're an elitist
Leftwing Liberal! KM
"Until you can intelligently articulate the other side's position, you are
not an adult. You are a liberal."
~ Ann Coulter
Naw! Time to respond to the issues under discussion. Ooops! Sorry, I'd
forgotten I was replying to an elite Leftwing Liberal who absolutely refuses
to stick to the issues. I'll try in the future to remember I'll be addressing
a whine-hard. KM
>
> And, of course, as an elitist Leftwing Liberal, you didn't offer one
> single word of support for your hilarious conclusion.
Pot.
Kettle.
Black.
Mitchell Holman
"Iraqis killed under Clinton: 500,000 to 1,000,000."
Keith "Alohacyberian" Martin, 10/14/05, unproven claim.
LOL! Love yer sig file!
>
>
>
>
so plonk me.
I'm sorry you don't understand that I'm not your enemy.
To late. I already bought it.
I'm not attacking you. I'm concerned about you. Are you bi-polar?
Without Keith's posts you have less than NOTHING to say, you impotent
little leftist fuckwit.
Drop dead.
Aloha's kneeslappers need to be preserved
for posterity.........
Mitchell Holman
"The so-called "Palestinian" agitators, squatters who
arrived from 1922 to 1933 and again in 1967 when Yasser
Arafat (who wasn't an Arab, but an English Lord) arrived."
Keith "Alohacyberian" Martin, 12/03/04
> Aloha's kneeslappers need to be preserved
> for posterity.........
Beats your vile drool.
Plonking is for intellectual cowards and over-sensitive souls. I've never
plonked anyone in the past and don't intend to do so in the future. KM
I never claimed you are my enemy, you did; but, I sincerely wonder where you
got that silly notion. I don't have any enemies in this newsgroup that I'm
aware of. In fact, I don't recall ever having a true "enemy" in my entire
life. Yes, I suppose there are enemies of America, so I suppose in some
esoteric sense I could claim them to be my enemies as well, but such things
seem melodramatic to me. But, at least we've succeeded in concentrating on
messengers so that we may avoid discussing the issues. That seems to be the
ultimate goal of many in these forums, doesn't it? KM
I hope you win. We don't have lottery tickets in Hawaii, so I can't join you
in that respect. KM
Is wanting to stick to discussing the contents of the messages in favor of
attacking messengers a symptom of bi-polar disorder? KM