pediatric BMI percentile

13 views
Skip to first unread message

Matt King

unread,
Feb 2, 2012, 11:22:25 AM2/2/12
to Hardhats
MU requirements use BMI percentile for patients between 0-18 yr of
age. standard pediatric growth charts plot height (or length) versus
weight and display in in a percentile graph. Question: Wouldn't the
percentile of the height and weight graph be exactly the same as the
BMI percentile graph? I don't understand why it would be different.
Can someone help me on that?

thanks,

matt

David Whitten

unread,
Feb 2, 2012, 11:32:32 AM2/2/12
to hard...@googlegroups.com
I'm not sure either, but I seem to recall that as you get taller that
your volume increases
at a cubic rate, whereas your height/weight would just be a linear relationship.
Do I remember correctly that the BMI (Body Mass Index) is calculated at
the weight divided by the square of the height with maybe a Finnegan's
Finagle Factor
to handle the issue of alternate units?

Perhaps some of the statisticians among us can tell us the details.

David

> --
> http://groups.google.com/group/Hardhats
> To unsubscribe, send email to Hardhats+u...@googlegroups.com

Matt King

unread,
Feb 2, 2012, 12:05:46 PM2/2/12
to Hardhats
Ok, that explains it. Thanks, David,
m

Nancy Anthracite

unread,
Feb 2, 2012, 11:35:42 AM2/2/12
to hard...@googlegroups.com, David Whitten
Yes, but the percentiles are based on data in tables sort of thing, based on
population studies so I would think that a certain height and weight should be
very close to the same percentile as the BMI within a small error because of
fitting the data to the equation used to figure the percentiles.


--
Nancy Anthracite

Matt King

unread,
Feb 2, 2012, 1:09:37 PM2/2/12
to Hardhats
Nancy,
You may be right. However, Kevin's latest Growth Charts have BMI
percentile as you reminded me offline. Do you know the latest KIDS
build and location for that?

thanks,

m

On Feb 2, 9:35 am, Nancy Anthracite <nanthrac...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> Yes, but the percentiles are based on data in tables sort of thing, based on
> population studies so I would think that a certain height and weight should be
> very close to the same percentile as the BMI within a small error because of
> fitting the data to the equation used to figure the percentiles.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thursday, February 02, 2012, David Whitten wrote:
> > I'm not sure either, but I seem to recall that as you get taller that
> > your volume increases
> > at a cubic rate, whereas your height/weight would just be a linear
> > relationship. Do I remember correctly that the BMI (Body Mass Index) is
> > calculated at the weight divided by the square of the height with maybe a
> > Finnegan's Finagle Factor
> > to handle the issue of alternate units?
>
> > Perhaps some of the statisticians among us can tell us the details.
>
> > David
>

mish

unread,
Feb 2, 2012, 12:32:37 PM2/2/12
to Hardhats
BMI = Weight (lb) / (Height (in) x Height (in)) x 703. So for English
units Mr Finagle is 703.

Mr. Finagle is banished in metrics multiverses...
BMI = Weight (kg) / (Height (m) x Height (m))

David Whitten

unread,
Feb 2, 2012, 3:13:53 PM2/2/12
to hard...@googlegroups.com
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 12:32 PM, mish <prof...@gmail.com> wrote:
> BMI = Weight (lb) / (Height (in) x Height (in)) x 703.  So for English
> units Mr Finagle is 703.
>
> Mr. Finagle is banished in metrics multiverses...
>  BMI = Weight (kg) / (Height (m) x Height (m))
>
For that equation, his Finagling Factor may just be equal to the number 1.
But I have been assured by several engineers that I know that he still has
a presence even among the metric worlds. His buddy Murphy has been
spotted also...

kdt...@gmail.com

unread,
Feb 9, 2012, 6:01:31 PM2/9/12
to Hardhats
Matt,

Email me offline, and I'll have Eddie send it to you...

Kevin
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages