Happstack 0.4RC2
stepcut
Thanks everyone who has helped test so far! We uncovered a few last
issues and things are looking great now!
koeien update the buildbot to 6.12.1 and we are now automatically
building happstack against 6.8.3, 6.10.2, and 6.12.1. I fixed a bug in
a test case and disabled the bogus XML test cases, and we are seeing
green lights across the board!
http://buildbot.happstack.com/
If you look at our test matrix, you will notice a big hole:
http://code.google.com/p/happstack/wiki/Happstack40Testing
It would be great to know if the latest sendfile and happstack from
darcs build correctly on Windows, and pass the test suites.
As soon as we know FreeBSD sendfile is fixed, and that Windows is
working, we can release 0.4 and move on to 0.5!
Thanks everyone for your help so far!
- jeremy
Paulo Tanimoto
Thanks for keeping Happstack moving forward!
This is what I get on my virtual machine -- it breaks on
happstack-server. It looks like "Handler.hs" imports System.Posix.IO,
which is not available on Windows. Or am I missing some option?
====================
[...]
src\Happstack\Server\HTTP\Handler.hs:39:7:
Could not find module `System.Posix.IO':
Use -v to see a list of the files searched for.
cabal.exe: Error: some packages failed to install:
happstack-server-0.4 failed during the building phase. The exception was:
exit: ExitFailure 1
====================
Take care,
Paulo
stepcut
have been committed.
Fixed in head. Let me know if it works now.
thanks again,
- jeremy
> happstack-server.log
> 16KViewDownload
Paulo Tanimoto
> Oops! Thanks for finding that! It is a bogus import that never should
> have been committed.
>
> Fixed in head. Let me know if it works now.
>
> thanks again,
> - jeremy
>
Yep, that did it! I tested a simple "hello world" program and it
works. Is there a more serious way of testing it?
Paulo
Paulo Tanimoto
By the way, this is on GHC 6.10.4 (Haskell Platform) if you want to
update the Wiki. I can give GHC 6.12.1 a try this weekend.
Paulo
Jeremy Shaw
Someone reported a build failure for happstack 0.3 on a 64-bit OS. Has
anyone tried building Happstack 0.4 on a 64-bit OS?
thanks!
- jeremy
> --
>
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "HAppS" group.
> To post to this group, send email to ha...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to happs+un...@googlegroups.com
> .
> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/happs?hl=en
> .
>
>
Paulo Tanimoto
On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 12:26 PM, Jeremy Shaw <jer...@n-heptane.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Someone reported a build failure for happstack 0.3 on a 64-bit OS. Has
> anyone tried building Happstack 0.4 on a 64-bit OS?
>
> thanks!
> - jeremy
>
It works for me. I'm on Ubuntu 9.10 64-bit with GHC 6.10.4.
Paulo
Paulo Tanimoto
Still on Ubuntu 64-bit, now with GHC 6.12.1 (RC) after installing
syb-with-class 0.6.1, I get the following error. It's not related to
happstack, so it surprises me because you've got it to work with GHC
6.12.1 before, right?
=======================
[...]
Downloading HJScript-0.4.4...
Configuring HJScript-0.4.4...
Preprocessing library HJScript-0.4.4...
Building HJScript-0.4.4...
src/HJScript/Lang.hs:30:4: parse error on input `rec'
cabal: Error: some packages failed to install:
HJScript-0.4.4 failed during the building phase. The exception was:
ExitFailure 1
happstack-0.4 depends on HJScript-0.4.4 which failed to install.
hsp-0.4.5 depends on HJScript-0.4.4 which failed to install.
=======================
Paulo
Anton van Straaten
tests successfully.)
Paulo Tanimoto
Well, now that I see there's a suite of tests, I ran:
==================
/c/download/happstack/happstack/tests$ ./Test.exe
Cases: 75 Tried: 75 Errors: 0 Failures: 070
99
==================
Is there a way I can get more details on the failures?
Paulo
Jeremy Shaw
> Still on Ubuntu 64-bit, now with GHC 6.12.1 (RC) after installing
> syb-with-class 0.6.1, I get the following error. It's not related to
> happstack, so it surprises me because you've got it to work with GHC
> 6.12.1 before, right?
koeien got it working in the buildbot. But he had to patch HJScript.
He sent a patch upstream. No idea how long it will take for that to
make it onto hackage..
Perhaps we should have koeien put the patch somewhere publicly
accessible in the meantime?
- jeremy
Jeremy Shaw
On Dec 19, 2009, at 1:28 PM, Paulo Tanimoto wrote:
> Well, now that I see there's a suite of tests, I ran:
>
> ==================
> /c/download/happstack/happstack/tests$ ./Test.exe
> Cases: 75 Tried: 75 Errors: 0 Failures: 070
> 99
> ==================
Hello. I don't think there are really any errors. I think it should
read:
> Cases: 75 Tried: 75 Errors: 0 Failures: 0
the 7099 stuff is just issues with runTestTT not refreshing the
display properly.
If there were actual errors it would print out a line with a
descriptive identifier for the error. Something like:
happstack:happstack-data:xml001:testname
- jeremy
Paulo Tanimoto
Ah, I see what you mean. : )
It looks like we're good, especially with 6.10. If I can get koeien's
patch, I can try it with GHC 6.12 on Windows. I say "try" because I
don't have it installed there yet.
Paulo
Felipe Lessa
> koeien got it working in the buildbot. But he had to patch HJScript.
> He sent a patch upstream. No idea how long it will take for that to
> make it onto hackage..
>
> Perhaps we should have koeien put the patch somewhere publicly
> accessible in the meantime?
Perhaps Hackage should have an NMU policy? (Especially for fixes
targeted to working with new systems while keeping compatibility
with old ones.)
--
Felipe.
Michael Steele
> darcs build correctly on Windows, and pass the test suites.
I tried installing it on Windows XP 32bit with Haskell Platform
2009.2.0.2 and MinGW 5.1.6.
Happstack built okay, but it looks like some tests failed:
C:\>happstack-util-tests
Cases: 3 Tried: 3 Errors: 0 Failures: 068
99
C:\>happstack-data-tests
Cases: 24 Tried: 24 Errors: 0 Failures: 0
C:\>happstack-state-tests
### Failure in: happstack-state:3:saverProperties:2:File:1:prop_seqReadWrite
Test failed with exception: DeleteFile: permission denied (The process cannot ac
cess the file because it is being used by another process.)
### Failure in: happstack-state:3:saverProperties:2:File:2:prop_cutDrop
Test failed with exception: DeleteFile: permission denied (The process cannot ac
cess the file because it is being used by another process.)
### Failure in: happstack-state:3:saverProperties:3:Queue File:1:prop_seqReadWri
te
Test failed with exception: <<loop>>
Cases: 25 Tried: 25 Errors: 0 Failures: 3
99
C:\>happstack-ixset-tests
Cases: 1 Tried: 1 Errors: 0 Failures: 0
C:\>happstack-server-tests
Cases: 11 Tried: 11 Errors: 0 Failures: 0
C:\>happstack-tests
### Failure in: happstack:3:happstack-state:3:saverProperties:2:File:1:prop_seqR
eadWrite
Test failed with exception: DeleteFile: permission denied (The process cannot ac
cess the file because it is being used by another process.)
### Failure in: happstack:3:happstack-state:3:saverProperties:3:Queue File:1:pro
p_seqReadWrite
Test failed with exception: <<loop>>
Cases: 75 Tried: 75 Errors: 0 Failures: 2
99
C:\>
Jeremy Shaw
On Dec 19, 2009, at 12:54 PM, Michael Steele wrote:
>> It would be great to know if the latest sendfile and happstack from
>> darcs build correctly on Windows, and pass the test suites.
>
> I tried installing it on Windows XP 32bit with Haskell Platform
> 2009.2.0.2 and MinGW 5.1.6.
>
> Happstack built okay, but it looks like some tests failed:
Very weird. Looks like some odd failure in the unit tests themselves.
I think the DeleteFile error is coming from the
removeDirectoryRecursive call. If you can figure out what went wrong,
we can see if we need to fix something. I don't think this is an
actual bug in happstack, so I am going to make the release anyway. If
it turns out I am wrong, I'll just have to release 0.4.2 ;)
- jeremy
Michael Steele
> I think the DeleteFile error is coming from the
> removeDirectoryRecursive call. If you can figure out what went wrong,
> we can see if we need to fix something. I don't think this is an
> actual bug in happstack, so I am going to make the release anyway. If
> it turns out I am wrong, I'll just have to release 0.4.2 ;)
>
> - jeremy
After installing from hackage I ran the tests again. This time
everything passed.
C:\>happstack-util-tests
Cases: 3 Tried: 3 Errors: 0 Failures: 068
99
C:\>happstack-data-tests
Cases: 24 Tried: 24 Errors: 0 Failures: 0
C:\>happstack-ixset-tests
Cases: 1 Tried: 1 Errors: 0 Failures: 0
C:\>happstack-server-tests
Cases: 11 Tried: 11 Errors: 0 Failures: 0
C:\>happstack-state-tests
Cases: 25 Tried: 25 Errors: 0 Failures: 09
99
C:\>