Haml Google Group

Re: [haml] Re: Weird production issue

nex...@gmail.com (Nathan Weizenbaum) — Tue, 10 Nov 2009 02:47:09 UT

I'd appreciate some more debugging, if possible - I'd like to resolve this
issue. Ugly mode shouldn't ever cause behavioral changes.

Could you try taking the raw Haml and removing code to find the minimal file
that still demonstrates the issue?

Re: Weird production issue

spd1...@gmail.com (Paul Singh) — Tue, 10 Nov 2009 02:12:15 UT

Yep, disabling ugly mode in production seems to have resolved the
issue for me. I'll keep debugging and let you know if I figure
anything else.

Re: Weird production issue

spd1...@gmail.com (Paul Singh) — Tue, 10 Nov 2009 00:38:57 UT

Sure thing, here's all of the raw stuff: [link]

I can point you to a production version running on heroku if you want
to see it in action.

Re: [haml] Re: Weird production issue

nex...@gmail.com (Nathan Weizenbaum) — Mon, 09 Nov 2009 23:57:41 UT

If you give me a link to your code, I'll take a look at it. There are some
compilation differences between development and production (due to ugly mode
being enabled in default in production), and that could be causing something
like this...**

Re: Weird production issue

spd1...@gmail.com (Paul Singh) — Mon, 09 Nov 2009 23:36:15 UT

Unfortunately, I don't think that's the problem -- I'm definitely
using "- form_for" here.

What's particularly odd is that the form appears to compile just fine
in development... once I switch to production, it just seems to be
repeating the form at random places inside the original form. If
you're interested, I can privately send you a link to the production

Re: [haml] Weird production issue

ch...@eppsteins.net (Chris Eppstein) — Mon, 09 Nov 2009 23:33:51 UT

You're probably writing "= form_for" instead of "- form_for"

Weird production issue

spd1...@gmail.com (Paul Singh) — Mon, 09 Nov 2009 23:28:09 UT

While using HAML in development mode, everything appears to be fine.
Oddly enough, when I switch over to production mode, I notice that my
form_for seems to repeat itself 3 or 4 times... have any thoughts on
what I might be doing wrong?

Haml 2.2.13 Released

nex...@gmail.com (Nathan Weizenbaum) — Mon, 09 Nov 2009 22:16:10 UT

I've just released Haml 2.2.13. The only changes are some (mildly hacky)
support for encoding compatibility with database adapters under Ruby 1.9
(see [link]),
and compatibility with Hpricot 0.8.2 for html2haml. There are no changes to

Re: is there any way to avoid the creation of init.rb?

aaron.gibral...@gmail.com (agibralter) — Mon, 09 Nov 2009 17:07:29 UT

Ah ok nevermind... it seeems like it only **re**-creates init.rb. I
won't create a vendor/plugins/haml/init.rb out of the blue. I went
ahead and deleted init.rb and I think that solves my problem.

is there any way to avoid the creation of init.rb?

aaron.gibral...@gmail.com (agibralter) — Mon, 09 Nov 2009 16:56:38 UT

haml-2.2.9/lib/haml/template.r b:57 seems to be creating a vendor/
plugins/haml/init.rb file. This is is not compatible with the
config.gem 'haml' way of doing things... config.gem already
automatically requires haml, so there is no need for the require
'haml' in init.rb. Also, since the require 'haml' line is forcibly

Re: [haml] Re: How does HAML get compiled?

com...@gmail.com (Norman Clarke) — Mon, 09 Nov 2009 12:54:00 UT

I am guessing you that you haven't set up will_paginate? Haml_scaffold
by default adds code that depends on will_paginate, but doesn't
install the gem nor does it configure it in environment.rb.

So make sure you have a line like

gem "will_paginage"

in your environment.rb, and it should work "out of the box."

Re: [haml] Re: What version of hpricot is necessary for running tests?

mislav.maroh...@gmail.com (Mislav Marohnić) — Mon, 09 Nov 2009 09:51:57 UT

Why port to Nokogiri? We are not using any of its extra features, nor we
need speed. Hpricot is a great parser and I've seen it resolve a messy HTML
document with loads of SCRIPT tags much better than Nokogiri.
If it isn't broken, don't change it. And if the code is incompatible with
new Hpricot, just load the old one (v0.6.x) via the `gem` function.

Re: [haml] Re: What version of hpricot is necessary for running tests?

nex...@gmail.com (Nathan Weizenbaum) — Mon, 09 Nov 2009 00:42:23 UT

Apparently Hpricot 0.8.2 breaks a lot of stuff... I've pushed compatibility
fixes to stable and master. They'll be released as part of 2.2.13, probably
some time today or tomorrow.

Re: [haml] Re: How does HAML get compiled?

nex...@gmail.com (Nathan Weizenbaum) — Sun, 08 Nov 2009 20:12:13 UT

I'm not sure what you mean by a "pagination error".

Re: get all assigned variables used in teh templates (HAML/PHP)

annemarie.tannengr...@googlemail.com (annemarie tannengrund) — Sun, 08 Nov 2009 09:30:31 UT

sorry if this was unclear, yepp its HAML for PHP (http://
phphaml.sourceforge.net/).

and nope, there is no PHP HAML group (at least i didnt find any).