Haml Google Group

Re: [haml] Re: Weird production issue

2009-11-10T02:47:09Z

I'd appreciate some more debugging, if possible - I'd like to resolve this
issue. Ugly mode shouldn't ever cause behavioral changes.

Could you try taking the raw Haml and removing code to find the minimal file
that still demonstrates the issue?

Re: Weird production issue

2009-11-10T02:12:15Z

Yep, disabling ugly mode in production seems to have resolved the
issue for me. I'll keep debugging and let you know if I figure
anything else.

Re: Weird production issue

2009-11-10T00:38:57Z

Sure thing, here's all of the raw stuff: [link]

I can point you to a production version running on heroku if you want
to see it in action.

Re: [haml] Re: Weird production issue

2009-11-09T23:57:41Z

If you give me a link to your code, I'll take a look at it. There are some
compilation differences between development and production (due to ugly mode
being enabled in default in production), and that could be causing something
like this...**

Re: Weird production issue

2009-11-09T23:36:15Z

Unfortunately, I don't think that's the problem -- I'm definitely
using "- form_for" here.

What's particularly odd is that the form appears to compile just fine
in development... once I switch to production, it just seems to be
repeating the form at random places inside the original form. If
you're interested, I can privately send you a link to the production

Re: [haml] Weird production issue

2009-11-09T23:33:51Z

You're probably writing "= form_for" instead of "- form_for"

Weird production issue

2009-11-09T23:28:09Z

While using HAML in development mode, everything appears to be fine.
Oddly enough, when I switch over to production mode, I notice that my
form_for seems to repeat itself 3 or 4 times... have any thoughts on
what I might be doing wrong?

Haml 2.2.13 Released

2009-11-09T22:16:10Z

I've just released Haml 2.2.13. The only changes are some (mildly hacky)
support for encoding compatibility with database adapters under Ruby 1.9
(see [link]),
and compatibility with Hpricot 0.8.2 for html2haml. There are no changes to

Re: is there any way to avoid the creation of init.rb?

2009-11-09T17:07:29Z

Ah ok nevermind... it seeems like it only **re**-creates init.rb. I
won't create a vendor/plugins/haml/init.rb out of the blue. I went
ahead and deleted init.rb and I think that solves my problem.

is there any way to avoid the creation of init.rb?

2009-11-09T16:56:38Z

haml-2.2.9/lib/haml/template.r b:57 seems to be creating a vendor/
plugins/haml/init.rb file. This is is not compatible with the
config.gem 'haml' way of doing things... config.gem already
automatically requires haml, so there is no need for the require
'haml' in init.rb. Also, since the require 'haml' line is forcibly

Re: [haml] Re: How does HAML get compiled?

2009-11-09T12:54:00Z

I am guessing you that you haven't set up will_paginate? Haml_scaffold
by default adds code that depends on will_paginate, but doesn't
install the gem nor does it configure it in environment.rb.

So make sure you have a line like

gem "will_paginage"

in your environment.rb, and it should work "out of the box."

Re: [haml] Re: What version of hpricot is necessary for running tests?

2009-11-09T09:51:57Z

Why port to Nokogiri? We are not using any of its extra features, nor we
need speed. Hpricot is a great parser and I've seen it resolve a messy HTML
document with loads of SCRIPT tags much better than Nokogiri.
If it isn't broken, don't change it. And if the code is incompatible with
new Hpricot, just load the old one (v0.6.x) via the `gem` function.

Re: [haml] Re: What version of hpricot is necessary for running tests?

2009-11-09T00:42:23Z

Apparently Hpricot 0.8.2 breaks a lot of stuff... I've pushed compatibility
fixes to stable and master. They'll be released as part of 2.2.13, probably
some time today or tomorrow.

Re: [haml] Re: How does HAML get compiled?

2009-11-08T20:12:13Z

I'm not sure what you mean by a "pagination error".

Re: get all assigned variables used in teh templates (HAML/PHP)

2009-11-08T09:30:31Z

sorry if this was unclear, yepp its HAML for PHP (http://
phphaml.sourceforge.net/).

and nope, there is no PHP HAML group (at least i didnt find any).