Gmail Calendar Documents Reader Web more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
What version of hpricot is necessary for running tests?
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  5 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Joe Van Dyk  
View profile  
 More options Nov 8, 12:17 am
From: Joe Van Dyk <joevan...@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 21:17:28 -0800 (PST)
Local: Sun, Nov 8 2009 12:17 am
Subject: What version of hpricot is necessary for running tests?
I seemed to have the most success with hpricot version 0.6.  Using
hpricot 0.8 made a lot of tests fail.

On a side note, why aren't we using nokogiri?


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Nathan Weizenbaum  
View profile  
 More options Nov 8, 12:27 am
From: Nathan Weizenbaum <nex...@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 21:27:46 -0800
Local: Sun, Nov 8 2009 12:27 am
Subject: Re: [haml] What version of hpricot is necessary for running tests?

I'm using hpricot 0.8, and everything's working for me...

as to why not Nokogiri, mostly because it's already written in Hpricot and I
don't know the Nokogiri APIs. If you want to take a crack at rewriting, go
for it.

On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 9:17 PM, Joe Van Dyk <joevan...@gmail.com> wrote:


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Chris Eppstein  
View profile  
 More options Nov 8, 1:14 am
From: Chris Eppstein <ch...@eppsteins.net>
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 22:14:17 -0800
Local: Sun, Nov 8 2009 1:14 am
Subject: Re: [haml] Re: What version of hpricot is necessary for running tests?

I just finished porting our app from Hpricot to Nokogiri... I took notes and
plan to write a blog post soon.

-chris


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Nathan Weizenbaum  
View profile  
 More options Nov 8, 7:42 pm
From: Nathan Weizenbaum <nex...@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 16:42:23 -0800
Local: Sun, Nov 8 2009 7:42 pm
Subject: Re: [haml] Re: What version of hpricot is necessary for running tests?

Apparently Hpricot 0.8.2 breaks a lot of stuff... I've pushed compatibility
fixes to stable and master. They'll be released as part of 2.2.13, probably
some time today or tomorrow.


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Mislav Marohnić  
View profile  
 More options Nov 9, 4:51 am
From: Mislav Marohnić <mislav.maroh...@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 10:51:57 +0100
Local: Mon, Nov 9 2009 4:51 am
Subject: Re: [haml] Re: What version of hpricot is necessary for running tests?

On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 06:27, Nathan Weizenbaum <nex...@gmail.com> wrote:

> as to why not Nokogiri, mostly because it's already written in Hpricot and
> I don't know the Nokogiri APIs

Why port to Nokogiri? We are not using any of its extra features, nor we
need speed. Hpricot is a great parser and I've seen it resolve a messy HTML
document with loads of SCRIPT tags much better than Nokogiri.

If it isn't broken, don't change it. And if the code is incompatible with
new Hpricot, just load the old one (v0.6.x) via the `gem` function.


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google