On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 10:22 AM, Mark Derricutt <m...
> +1 - however...
> One thing that's always (*#&$(*&#($*#'d me off with @deprecated javadoc in
> JavaLand is the lack of any form of "see here for the new stuff" type
> If we're going to add a deprecates attribute, could we also add
> superceeded-by-rel="foo2" or something to that affect ( assuming its
> replaced by something? ).
I think I'd prefer something more simple like a deprecation-info
attribtue that's just a string that could be included in a warning
But I'm worried this might be over-complicating things a bit.. if the
relation that's being deprecated is a URI pointing to documentation,
that would seem like a natural place to visit for more info anyway?
> Part of thinks this should be some form formal metadata on the rel URI's
> documentation, but then it struck me that this is the deprecatation of a
> specific link, not the rel itself.
fwiw, I wasn't intending to draw any distinction there
sure, if everyone else is happy with that?