From: Philip Johnson <john...@hawaii.edu>
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 15:00:44 -1000
Local: Mon, Jan 21 2008 8:00 pm
Subject: Re: [hackystat-dev] RFC: Version 8.1 planning
--On January 21, 2008 1:54:13 PM -1000 Daniel N Port <dp...@hawaii.edu> wrote: yes, it's perfect. > I'm anxious to write a FFT or Bayesian network telemetry analysis > package because I'm curious to see what might pop out. Do you think > v.81 is a good target for this? > Hopefully it will be fairly straightforward to implement with the Well, it depends. The most "natural" approach is as two hackystat > v.8 architecture (seems so) but I've kind of been waiting for the > architecture to stabilize a bit before launching into it. Is there > an analogous example package I might adapt to get things started? services: hackystat-analysis-fft hackystat-ui-fft Splitting things up this way is nice because: If you want to follow this approach, then the best examples are If you want to simply hack something together quickly (i.e. the > Also, is there a decent amount of telemetry data to analyze at this point? No, but don't let that stop you. Look at the <http://code.google.com/p/hackystat/wiki/Tutorial_SoftwareProjectTelem...> What you can do is write your own package in That's actually a really nice way to do development; get something Cheers, You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||