Received: by 10.52.71.177 with SMTP id w17mr3601541vdu.8.1346628663479;
        Sun, 02 Sep 2012 16:31:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: hackerspace_brisbane@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.220.148.143 with SMTP id p15ls4054667vcv.9.gmail; Sun, 02 Sep
 2012 16:31:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.58.58.100 with SMTP id p4mr4236762veq.38.1346628663098;
        Sun, 02 Sep 2012 16:31:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.58.58.100 with SMTP id p4mr4236761veq.38.1346628663088;
        Sun, 02 Sep 2012 16:31:03 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <tjho...@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-vb0-f49.google.com (mail-vb0-f49.google.com [209.85.212.49])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id cf2si1124751vdb.0.2012.09.02.16.31.03
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Sun, 02 Sep 2012 16:31:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of tjho...@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.49 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.212.49;
Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of tjho...@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.49 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=tjho...@gmail.com; dkim=pass header...@gmail.com
Received: by vbbfo1 with SMTP id fo1so5782967vbb.8
        for <hackerspace_brisbane@googlegroups.com>; Sun, 02 Sep 2012 16:31:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type;
        bh=e6tTFdaaaTP32B6BpiIE51tkI2JqIUoKetMz1Iwl8p0=;
        b=z5n8DeRGq01NpRSGbTCE7Vnoz5GZchVVdZi/UYE/eLLdSfhtzdxkB5h8rOr1h6GR5p
         3uoJTAtBsO4prIzuOU7Nhqt8j/AlmYgtAinqrV+I8M6u5mhlPblZ/iWSsqxQt8lnQwKz
         c41nZcEHDKPtIuAd+VUvcy1CDFmSH7Pq9fRdvrP1T+Rp6ucg8sQPEFlwybxlKr062n6F
         SDg487ihYXirAeHjJosCU5Hnn6SD4hC3RSBXjwfPeVEJgcVV9rVui0CtxeIGq34WvcL0
         dJrK2z2Kwc+C1zH1BQW9ERfCCMcK38THQJcAyr4KiVo30uRsb4+wtwsqpzrnpwMQNMU7
         UWyQ==
Received: by 10.52.64.234 with SMTP id r10mr8580521vds.80.1346628662970; Sun,
 02 Sep 2012 16:31:02 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.58.210.202 with HTTP; Sun, 2 Sep 2012 16:30:42 -0700 (PDT)
From: tjhowse <tjho...@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2012 09:30:42 +1000
Message-ID: <CAAxzKbQELGMyfLxq5Cs4FaORNTOnPtvzmNLiimuiDV2AWq0...@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Mesh network wifi
To: hackerspace_brisbane <hackerspace_brisbane@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf307ac77519c97604c8c06bec

--20cf307ac77519c97604c8c06bec
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Has anyone had any experience with ad-hoc wifi mesh networks? We're looking
at setting up a temporary, mobile wifi mesh network to help us commission a
site at work. Generally the work we'll be doing is inside buildings with
metal sheeting inside the walls, so we'd be looking at multiple
battery-powered relay points, and a mobile testing setup in a rack on
wheels or something. The idea is that we plug a network device into a node
at the eventual termination point and then wander around with a laptop and
test the device.

Anyone know which is the most popular/robust/fast standard? I'd rather not
recommend we buy a shitty propitiatory, vendor-specific flavour of mesh
network.

--20cf307ac77519c97604c8c06bec
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Has anyone had any experience with ad-hoc wifi mesh networks? We&#39;re loo=
king at setting up a temporary, mobile wifi mesh network to help us commiss=
ion a site at work. Generally the work we&#39;ll be doing is inside buildin=
gs with metal sheeting inside the walls, so we&#39;d be looking at multiple=
 battery-powered relay points, and a mobile testing setup in a rack on whee=
ls or something. The idea is that we plug a network device into a node at t=
he eventual termination point and then wander around with a laptop and test=
 the device.<div>

<br></div><div>Anyone know which is the most popular/robust/fast standard? =
I&#39;d rather not recommend we buy a shitty=A0propitiatory, vendor-specifi=
c flavour of mesh network.</div><div><br></div>

--20cf307ac77519c97604c8c06bec--