Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion DIY Diesel Electric car conversions?
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Lemming Dixon  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
 More options Nov 17 2011, 2:04 am
From: Lemming Dixon <inert...@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 17:04:01 +1000
Local: Thurs, Nov 17 2011 2:04 am
Subject: Re: DIY Diesel Electric car conversions?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrolysis_of_water#Efficiency

"The energy efficiency of water electrolysis varies widely with the numbers
cited below on the optimistic side. Some report 50–80%. These values refer
only to the efficiency of converting electrical energy into hydrogen's
chemical energy. The energy lost in generating the electricity is not
included. For instance, when considering a power plant that converts the
heat of nuclear reactions into hydrogen via electrolysis, the total
efficiency may be closer to 30–45%, although the inefficiencies of
powerplants in turning heat into electrical energy is not usually included
in efficiency, so the former measure of 50-80% efficient is probably a more
realistic efficiency."

So if you are running this off your diesel engine which is probably running
at best 40% efficency, then converting some of that energy into electrical
power to run an electrolysis cell at 50% - 80% efficient (and I would say
more likely 50% if it's home made) then the production losses are likely to
quickly overwhelm any actual performance gain. There *may* be some slight
cost gain seeing as the engine may use a bit less fuel and water is a lot
cheaper, but I am dubious of that at best without numbers to back it up.

Also on the topic of LPG injection.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lpg_autogas#LPG_injection_for_diesel_veh...

"Even at full output a diesel engine runs about 50% lean of stoichiometric
to avoid black smoke production, so there is a substantial amount of oxygen
in the intake charge which is not consumed in the combustion process. This
oxygen is therefore available for the combustion of a substantial addition
of LPG resulting in a large increase in power output."

So in the case of running "HHO" into the engine you are actually putting in
a lot more oxygen than is strictly necessary and thus probably making the
engine run leaner than it otherwise would.

On 17 November 2011 16:53, Triffid Hunter <triffid.hun...@gmail.com> wrote:

> yes I've heard of many diesels using LPG as well. The idea behind this
> is that the diesel lights the LPG, so the engine uses the fairly low
> 'idle' flowrate of diesel at all speeds to replace spark plugs, and
> the LPG provides all the extra power. Since LPG is a lot cheaper, you
> get the advantages of both.

> In theory, if you replaced the glow plugs with spark plugs and fitted
> appropriate coil and distributor you could run from LPG only and still
> have the power gains from all that extra compression. Practice may be
> a little trickier!

> As for the hydrogen/oxygen thing, the energy comes from the engine. So
> the theory is more like a turbo reusing engine output to increase
> efficiency than a separate source of energy.

> I haven't seen any claims of over-unity for this particular theory
> (adding HHO gas to increase mileage) - I consider the 100%
> water-powered cars a completely separate claim, and from what I can
> tell, complete vapourware.

> On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 5:42 PM, Matt B <mattb.in...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Another sort of similar system,

> > Many years (10+) ago, while working in a factory, one of the trucks we
> were
> > loading up had an LPG tank, in place of one of the diesel tanks (LPG Tank
> > was about 1/3 the length of diesel tanks which looked around 150-200L
> > capacity each), it was a test/demo setup for an engineering company,
> where
> > they injected a little LPG in with the air, while the diesel used normal
> > injector mechanisms.

> > The driver swore by it, he claimed it gave him more power, making uphill
> > runs faster (eg range crossings) and better mileage overall.  He told us
> he
> > refilled the LPG when filling up the other 3 tanks... So there might be
> some
> > truth to the HHO improvements in performance, but as for overunity? the
> Jury
> > is still out.. ;)

> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "hackerspace_brisbane" group.
> To post to this group, send email to hackerspace_brisbane@googlegroups.com
> .
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> hackerspace_brisbane+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/hackerspace_brisbane?hl=en.


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.