Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
rethinking the air cannon
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  15 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Steven Pickles  
View profile  
 More options Nov 12 2012, 9:10 pm
From: Steven Pickles <thatpix...@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 12:40:44 +1030
Local: Mon, Nov 12 2012 9:10 pm
Subject: rethinking the air cannon

just thinking out loud...

the air cannon is somewhere amongst the rubble that was once the corridor
next to format. when we get it back i'm thinking of decommissioning it.

well, what i'm actually thinking of doing is finding a way to connect up
the electrical (not-really-for-air) valves and the turrets directly to our
compressor. that way, we can stop using the (silently terrifying) PVC pipe
as a pressure vessel, and use the air compressor instead.

not sure if we will get enough throughput from the outlet of the
compressor, but let's find out...

http://compressedair.squarespace.com/journal/2012/2/27/can-i-use-pvc-...

... of course, doing this will compress all of the failure points into
whatever arrangement we come up with for connecting the valve to the
compressor. i might make sense to buy an appropriate valve instead.

pix


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Kim Hawtin  
View profile  
 More options Nov 12 2012, 9:43 pm
From: Kim Hawtin <kimhaw...@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 13:13:39 +1030
Local: Mon, Nov 12 2012 9:43 pm
Subject: Re: [HACK-ADL] rethinking the air cannon
hi pix,

On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Steven Pickles <thatpix...@gmail.com> wrote:
> just thinking out loud...
8<
> ... of course, doing this will compress all of the failure points into
> whatever arrangement we come up with for connecting the valve to the
> compressor. i might make sense to buy an appropriate valve instead.

what is the flow rate of your air compressor?
usually in cubic feet per minute (CFM).
i've also seen liters per second.
although not sure whats the most common.

so, what is the flow rate you need to launch ... things?

is there any compressed air storage in the current setup?

cheers,

kim
--
"Art without engineering is dreaming; engineering without art is
calculating."  --SKR


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Steven Pickles  
View profile  
 More options Nov 12 2012, 9:55 pm
From: Steven Pickles <thatpix...@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 13:25:18 +1030
Local: Mon, Nov 12 2012 9:55 pm
Subject: Re: [HACK-ADL] rethinking the air cannon

On 13 November 2012 13:13, Kim Hawtin <kimhaw...@gmail.com> wrote:

> hi pix,

> On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Steven Pickles <thatpix...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > just thinking out loud...
> 8<

meep meep ?

> > ... of course, doing this will compress all of the failure points into
> > whatever arrangement we come up with for connecting the valve to the
> > compressor. i might make sense to buy an appropriate valve instead.

> what is the flow rate of your air compressor?
> usually in cubic feet per minute (CFM).
> i've also seen liters per second.
> although not sure whats the most common.

i kind of doubt that such figures are quoted in the manual of the one we
got from bunnings but i'll have a look... however:

> so, what is the flow rate you need to launch ... things?

no idea. and surely you realise that it would be much more fun to test than
do all this thinkin' :)

> is there any compressed air storage in the current setup?

yep, two big PVC tubes (rated to 150psi for water, not gas - hence silently
terrifying), with wide ~1" openings for high flow.

pix


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Fee Plumley  
View profile  
 More options Nov 12 2012, 10:15 pm
From: Fee Plumley <f...@technoevangelist.net>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 13:45:13 +1030
Local: Mon, Nov 12 2012 10:15 pm
Subject: Re: [HACK-ADL] rethinking the air cannon

you say decommissioning ... can't you keep it (or something like it) for
Mini Maker Faire?!

and please video any tests or reversioning experiments ;P

On 13 November 2012 13:25, Steven Pickles <thatpix...@gmail.com> wrote:

--

Fee Plumley

*>>** CROWDFUNDING SUCCESSFUL <http://pozible.com/reallybigroadtrip>!
reallybigroadtrip can get a bus! **<<*

Digital Nomad at http://reallybigroadtrip.com - making & sharing geek arts
across Australia.
Head Geek at http://technoevangelist.net - spreading the word of geek since
1996.

Chat via twitter <http://twitter.com/feesable>,
facebook<http://www.facebook.com/reallybigroadtrip> or
sign up to my newsletter <http://rbrt.cc/RBRTnews>.


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Steven Pickles  
View profile  
 More options Nov 12 2012, 10:18 pm
From: Steven Pickles <thatpix...@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 13:48:04 +1030
Local: Mon, Nov 12 2012 10:18 pm
Subject: Re: [HACK-ADL] rethinking the air cannon

Hmm, you do make a good point Fee. Perhaps I should just relocate the Force
Petal v1.0 to my place for safe keeping, and we can work on a safer (and
less unwieldy and enormous) v2.0.

pix

On 13 November 2012 13:45, Fee Plumley <f...@technoevangelist.net> wrote:


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Ken  
View profile  
 More options Nov 12 2012, 10:22 pm
From: Ken <k...@waggies.net>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 13:52:07 +1030
Local: Mon, Nov 12 2012 10:22 pm
Subject: Re: [HACK-ADL] rethinking the air cannon

Would it be feasible to charge the PVC pipe from a 12v electric car-tyre
pump?
It'd be slow, but does that matter?

On 13 November 2012 13:48, Steven Pickles <thatpix...@gmail.com> wrote:


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Robert Hart  
View profile  
 More options Nov 12 2012, 10:33 pm
From: Robert Hart <rob...@hardhack.org.au>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 14:03:37 +1030
Local: Mon, Nov 12 2012 10:33 pm
Subject: Re: [HACK-ADL] rethinking the air cannon

Sorry haven't read the rest of the thread,

Not that I've built such a thing, although I've often liked the idea of
a large vortex cannon.  So one of the PVC pipes is the receiver tank and
the other the cannon?

So is it mostly all about the storage capacity of the receiver tank and
the port size of the solenoid valve and how quickly it can release the
stored air.  So the compressor actually would not have to be that large
so long as it can reach the the total psi you want to charge the
receiver tank with  (150psi can be reached with a small electric tyre
pump), then the CFM you choose will only depend on how quickly you want
to recharge the receiver tank.

Robert

On 13/11/2012 1:25 PM, Steven Pickles wrote:


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Steven Pickles  
View profile  
 More options Nov 12 2012, 10:53 pm
From: Steven Pickles <thatpix...@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 14:23:20 +1030
Local: Mon, Nov 12 2012 10:53 pm
Subject: Re: [HACK-ADL] rethinking the air cannon

Umm, I'm not sure what this would achieve as we already have a quite
massive air compressor and it would still rely on dangerous PVC pressure
vessel for compressed air, which I'm trying to eliminate, but yes,
technically possible if the car pump can get up to sufficient PSI.

The plan is to use the pressure vessel in the air compressor we have, and
see if it can dump its load of air fast enough to launch something (I'm
starting to think the answer to that is no).

pix

On 13 November 2012 13:52, Ken <k...@waggies.net> wrote:


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Steven Pickles  
View profile  
 More options Nov 12 2012, 10:56 pm
From: Steven Pickles <thatpix...@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 14:26:27 +1030
Local: Mon, Nov 12 2012 10:56 pm
Subject: Re: [HACK-ADL] rethinking the air cannon

Hey Robert, what you describe is what we already have.

Air compressor (with large currently underutilised air tank) -> PVC
pressure vessel -(wide mouth)-> solenoid valve -(wide mouth)-> PVC turret

I'm basically wondering if we can get sufficient flow out of the tank built
in to the air compressor to eliminate the need for the (dangerous) PVC
pressure vessel.

pix

On 13 November 2012 14:03, Robert Hart <rob...@hardhack.org.au> wrote:


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Robert Hart  
View profile  
 More options Nov 12 2012, 11:38 pm
From: Robert Hart <rob...@hardhack.org.au>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 15:08:02 +1030
Local: Mon, Nov 12 2012 11:38 pm
Subject: Re: [HACK-ADL] rethinking the air cannon

I've heard  people using a spent CO2 fire extinguisher bottle as a
pressure vessel as they are rated for a specific psi and are built to
withstand a bit of ruff treatment and best of all have a standard 1/2"
tread on them for for air-hoses.

I have few bits and bobs of pneumatic gear let me know if there is
something you need, happy to donate.

Robert

On 13/11/2012 2:26 PM, Steven Pickles wrote:


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Steven Pickles  
View profile  
 More options Nov 12 2012, 11:49 pm
From: Steven Pickles <thatpix...@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 15:19:10 +1030
Local: Mon, Nov 12 2012 11:49 pm
Subject: Re: [HACK-ADL] rethinking the air cannon

Yeah I was thinking that might be an option if we can't get enough flow out
of the tank on the compressor. Though once the appropriate fittings are
used I'm not really sure how much larger the opening on the extinguisher
tank will be.

pix

On 13 November 2012 15:08, Robert Hart <rob...@hardhack.org.au> wrote:


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Kim Hawtin  
View profile  
 More options Nov 12 2012, 11:56 pm
From: Kim Hawtin <kimhaw...@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 15:26:54 +1030
Local: Mon, Nov 12 2012 11:56 pm
Subject: Re: [HACK-ADL] rethinking the air cannon
hi pix,

On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 2:26 PM, Steven Pickles <thatpix...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm basically wondering if we can get sufficient flow out of the tank built
> in to the air compressor to eliminate the need for the (dangerous) PVC
> pressure vessel.

if you have a dump valve from the ouput of the aircompressor and
storage tank, then you are going to hit that 120-150PSI.

Dumping that directly into a 2" pvc launch tube is going to be enough.
especially if the launched item seals well enough or you have
something that seals behind it. launch tube doesn't have to be too
long, a meter will do.
I have sort of done this with my 2hp compressor and 20 liter tank.
Runs up to 120PSI, although it didn't need to be that high... Needed
to get a tennis ball over a high tree branch to haul up an antenna =D
I just use the dump valve in the output of the tank. Takes a bit of
practice, but works a treat. Short link hoses help ;)

cheers,

Kim
--
"Art without engineering is dreaming; engineering without art is
calculating."  --SKR


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Ken  
View profile  
 More options Nov 13 2012, 12:00 am
From: Ken <k...@waggies.net>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 15:29:54 +1030
Local: Mon, Nov 12 2012 11:59 pm
Subject: Re: [HACK-ADL] rethinking the air cannon

Hey Kim, why didn't you use the traditional method of lead weight fired
from slingshot, trailing fishing line?

On 13 November 2012 15:26, Kim Hawtin <kimhaw...@gmail.com> wrote:


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Kim Hawtin  
View profile  
 More options Nov 13 2012, 1:15 am
From: Kim Hawtin <kimhaw...@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 16:45:39 +1030
Local: Tues, Nov 13 2012 1:15 am
Subject: Re: [HACK-ADL] rethinking the air cannon

On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Ken <k...@waggies.net> wrote:
> Hey Kim, why didn't you use the traditional method of lead weight fired from
> slingshot, trailing fishing line?

didn't have any to hand. slingshots are getting harder and hard to get ...
you can find very nice antenna lauchers on teh internets, but customs
love them even more.
i'm told that once you import something like a sling shot, you get on
a customs full cavity search list.
none of your imported packages are ever quiet the same again.

so a simple solution like using the air compressor sounded like a lot
more fun[1].

cheers,

kim
--
"Art without engineering is dreaming; engineering without art is
calculating."  --SKR

[1] yes, even in the dwarf fortress sense.


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Andrew Helgeson  
View profile  
 More options Nov 13 2012, 8:11 am
From: Andrew Helgeson <cyberte...@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 23:41:21 +1030
Local: Tues, Nov 13 2012 8:11 am
Subject: Re: [HACK-ADL] rethinking the air cannon

Not wanting to be a wet blanket here, but...

You guys do realise this device you are discussing in an open forum is so
illeagle its not funny?

The air cannon I helped Pro Hart design got him a huge fine, that was 20
years ago.

After Media Mike's weapon reform laws got passed stuff like this, amongst
other things, are legally defined as an offensive weapon.

Andrew

On 13/11/2012 2:23 PM, "Steven Pickles" <thatpix...@gmail.com> wrote:

Umm, I'm not sure what this would achieve as we already have a quite
massive air compressor and it would still rely on dangerous PVC pressure
vessel for compressed air, which I'm trying to eliminate, but yes,
technically possible if the car pump can get up to sufficient PSI.

The plan is to use the pressure vessel in the air compressor we have, and
see if it can dump its load of air fast enough to launch something (I'm
starting to think the answer to that is no).

pix

On 13 November 2012 13:52, Ken <k...@waggies.net> wrote:

> Would it be feasible to charge the PVC...

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"HackerSpace - Adelaid...

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »