Now I know we've not discussed branding, other than we need some at
some point. The main index page mockups I've attached basically give a
couple of colour combinations that we could go with, but this is NOT
supposed to be our branding. i've specifically limited the number of
images that would be needed in the code within this design to 2 so
that it can allow us to change the colour scheme as much as we want
very easily.
I guess the reasoning is that we can change the look of the site very
simply every time we release a new version, leading up to version 1.0.
By that stage we'll be a little bit more clear as to what has been
useful for people and what colour scheme and branding we ultimately
want to go down. Also i don't see any of our colour schemes being lost
really, because we may be able to use them in the default theme. I'll
write something more indepth for that as it warrants it's own
discussion really. The final mockup is the more current version, i've
attached the other ones to give an indication of the colour schemes
that we can easily try out (although I've got to be honest, knocking
out different colour schemes is pretty easy), and it may seem
premature to start talking more detail about colours, but alas for our
main page we do want to make sure we stand out from the rest.
Another idea is to make every page a different colour scheme. Could be
confusing but it could also be fun as well (just throwing ideas out
there).
The copy might need a little bit of a polish, but the whole idea is to
keep things in a relatively playful fashion which in many respects
mimics the community and interaction that we currently have. I'm still
fiddling with all the other pages to be honest, but this can be coded
up pretty quickly if the consensus is positive, hell if someone wants
to help out, I'm sure we can set up a branch and have a bit of a
collaborative effort from everyone to make it that much better. I've
also got some pretty clear thoughts about how the documentation page
should look like, but I need I've never really skinned mediawiki, so
not sure how difficult it actually is.
Now you'll notice that the footer has got a quote that says 'Channel
the dissent and create something beautiful', I see this as an area for
pulling (from a random selector) quotes that people in the community
have come up with that they're fond of. I'm sure something to do with
Pony's can be put into this as well:).
good, but the first thing I ever look at is screenshots. These should
preferably be taken with the standard browser/OS for blogging (and
looks), Safari on OS X!
Lets get this thang moving!
Chris
I don't think that the Habariproject.org theme is stored in any of our
public repositories.
To that end my feeling is that the white and black motif does not achieve those goals. My reasoning for this is that using white as the main colour while utilitarian in nature is also cold and brings a much more corporate feel than one of individual and community.
I think that while it may be nice that the main site follows the admin panel in terms of look I also think that we should consider them as separate entities since they provide different functions where one encompasses the entire community. Not sure if this is making sense to everyone?
I am really against using mac-only fonts anywhere in Habari. I really can't see any good to have any aspect of Habari to promote the looks-better-on-mac idea.
Don't get me wrong, I like the mac and I am even a mac "wanabe" :) My point is that Habari admin, default themes, and even hp.o itself should look the same in every major browser. We don't want to give the impression of being biased to any platform.
Strictly speaking, Helvetica isn't a Mac-only font. And it of course degrades to Arial when it isn't available, and since Arial is near carbon copy of Helvetica, it isn't a particularly big issue.
What about Helvetica Light? There is no "Arial Light" to degrade to, or is there?
I haven't looked at the mockups, but I am strongly against losing blog
entries and other updating community information from the home page.
If anything I think we should increase their prominence. Habari is a
blog (even though it can do other things), we should show of its
blogginess.
--
Michael C. Harris, School of CS&IT, RMIT University
http://twofishcreative.com/michael/blog
If you are a proponent that the Habari admin should look like theHabariproject.org site, then you must also agree that Adobe's site
should look like the Photoshop interface.
I'm inclined to ask: how fast could we see HTML using the colors of"200803 Habari Index Rev0" in {font-family: Helvetica, Arial}?
Takers?
I am lamenting the loss of the blog entries and -user threads on the
home page though. It would be nice if the community interaction we so
espouse here was also one of the first things that people interact
with when they visit the site.
On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 9:59 PM, ringmaster <epi...@gmail.com> wrote:
I'm inclined to ask: how fast could we see HTML using the colors of"200803 Habari Index Rev0" in {font-family: Helvetica, Arial}?
Takers?What does that mean?
I think our community is a big driver to get people excited - it was
certainly central for me - and the community aspects should be
prominent. But if others disagree and are happy to move the community
aspects to a secondary location, I won't raise a ruckus.