> - Fixed the sandbox
> - Fixed a func_get_args() used as a function parameter.
> - Fixed several other issues.

> Andrew wrote:
> > Off the top of my head...

> > - Fixed the sandbox
> > - Fixed a func_get_args() used as a function parameter.
> > - Fixed several other issues.

> 'cos if not, I'm currently doing the merging and getting a branch ready
> for a 0.3.1 'release'.

> -Matt

> 'cos if not, I'm currently doing the merging and getting a branch ready
> for a 0.3.1 'release'.

> Does anyone vehemently oppose the release of Habari 0.3.1, an update to
> the 0.3 release fixing the most glaring bugs to make 0.3 alpha usable
> for the less technically inclined who don't want to roll from svn HEAD?

> Andrew wrote:

> > Off the top of my head...

> > - Fixed the sandbox
> > - Fixed a func_get_args() used as a function parameter.
> > - Fixed several other issues.

> 'cos if not, I'm currently doing the merging and getting a branch ready
> for a 0.3.1 'release'.

> -Matt

> On Nov 20, 2007 5:22 PM, Matthias Bauer <moef...@moeffju.net> wrote:

> Does anyone vehemently oppose the release of Habari 0.3.1, an update  
> to
> the 0.3 release fixing the most glaring bugs to make 0.3 alpha usable
> for the less technically inclined who don't want to roll from svn  
> HEAD?

> Andrew wrote:

> > Off the top of my head...

> > - Fixed the sandbox
> > - Fixed a func_get_args() used as a function parameter.
> > - Fixed several other issues.

> 'cos if not, I'm currently doing the merging and getting a branch  
> ready
> for a 0.3.1 'release'.

> -Matt

> > 'cos if not, I'm currently doing the merging and getting a branch  
> > ready
> > for a 0.3.1 'release'.

> Bully for you!

> +1 from me.

> C
> ____________________________________

> Caius Durling
> UK Student -- +44 (0) 7960 268100
> ca...@caius.name -- nemo8...@mac.comhttp://caius.name/--http://hentan.eu
> ____________________________________

> On Nov 21, 7:20 am, Caius Durling <nemo8...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 21 Nov 2007, at 01:22, Matthias Bauer wrote:

>>> 'cos if not, I'm currently doing the merging and getting a branch  
>>> ready
>>> for a 0.3.1 'release'.
>> Bully for you!

>> +1 from me.

>> C
>> ____________________________________

>> Caius Durling
>> UK Student -- +44 (0) 7960 268100
>> ca...@caius.name -- nemo8...@mac.comhttp://caius.name/--http://hentan.eu
>> ____________________________________

> > Does anyone vehemently oppose the release of Habari 0.3.1, an update to
> > the 0.3 release fixing the most glaring bugs to make 0.3 alpha usable
> > for the less technically inclined who don't want to roll from svn HEAD?

> > 'cos if not, I'm currently doing the merging and getting a branch ready
> > for a 0.3.1 'release'.

> There's a zip and tgz for testing at:

> http://ubermutant.net/~moeffju/habari-0.3.1-test1.ziphttp://ubermutan...

> If you are currently running 0.3, try updating to this version and let
> me know how it goes.

> Everyone else: This is basically r1077 with (parts of) [1100], [1103]
> and [1108] merged in. For details, see the SVN log or the
> <http://trac.habariproject.org/habari/changeset?old_path=trunk&old=107...>
> trac timeline.

> If this works out ok, I'd like to release it as 0.3.1 asap.

> -Matt

> Sean (Morydd) commented on IRC that we wouldn't be able to get to this
> thread, but he tested to release on his .3 DR install, and all is fine
> going into day 2 of the install.  Not sure if anyone else has tested.
> Would a note on -users be neccessary?

> ~milkb

> On Nov 20, 9:16 pm, Matthias Bauer <moef...@moeffju.net> wrote:
>> On 2007-11-21 02:22 Matthias Bauer wrote:

>>> Does anyone vehemently oppose the release of Habari 0.3.1, an  
>>> update to
>>> the 0.3 release fixing the most glaring bugs to make 0.3 alpha  
>>> usable
>>> for the less technically inclined who don't want to roll from svn  
>>> HEAD?

>>> 'cos if not, I'm currently doing the merging and getting a branch  
>>> ready
>>> for a 0.3.1 'release'.

>> There's a zip and tgz for testing at:

>> http://ubermutant.net/~moeffju/habari-0.3.1-test1.ziphttp://ubermutan...
>> ~moeffju/habari-0.3.1-test1.tar.gz

>> If you are currently running 0.3, try updating to this version and  
>> let
>> me know how it goes.

>> Everyone else: This is basically r1077 with (parts of) [1100], [1103]
>> and [1108] merged in. For details, see the SVN log or the
>> <http://trac.habariproject.org/habari/changeset?old_path=trunk&old=107...

>> trac timeline.

>> If this works out ok, I'd like to release it as 0.3.1 asap.

>> -Matt

> On Nov 21, 2007, at 2:30 PM, Michael Bishop wrote:

> > Sean (Morydd) commented on IRC that we wouldn't be able to get to this
> > thread, but he tested to release on his .3 DR install, and all is fine
> > going into day 2 of the install.  Not sure if anyone else has tested.
> > Would a note on -users be neccessary?

> > ~milkb

> > On Nov 20, 9:16 pm, Matthias Bauer <moef...@moeffju.net> wrote:
> >> On 2007-11-21 02:22 Matthias Bauer wrote:

> >>> Does anyone vehemently oppose the release of Habari 0.3.1, an  
> >>> update to
> >>> the 0.3 release fixing the most glaring bugs to make 0.3 alpha  
> >>> usable
> >>> for the less technically inclined who don't want to roll from svn  
> >>> HEAD?

> >>> 'cos if not, I'm currently doing the merging and getting a branch  
> >>> ready
> >>> for a 0.3.1 'release'.

> >> There's a zip and tgz for testing at:

> >>http://ubermutant.net/~moeffju/habari-0.3.1-test1.ziphttp://ubermutan...
> >> ~moeffju/habari-0.3.1-test1.tar.gz

> >> If you are currently running 0.3, try updating to this version and  
> >> let
> >> me know how it goes.

> >> Everyone else: This is basically r1077 with (parts of) [1100], [1103]
> >> and [1108] merged in. For details, see the SVN log or the
> >> <http://trac.habariproject.org/habari/changeset?old_path=trunk&old=107...

> >> trac timeline.

> >> If this works out ok, I'd like to release it as 0.3.1 asap.

> >> -Matt

> Seeing as no one objected, 0.3.1 is out. Check the GCode page for the
> files and let me know if you run into problems.