Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion We plan to add Ads to the free version and also provide the paid version

Received: by 10.204.22.79 with SMTP id m15mr228724bkb.10.1280128457308;
        Mon, 26 Jul 2010 00:14:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: gtasks-by-dato@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.204.152.197 with SMTP id h5ls959195bkw.3.p; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 
	00:14:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.204.15.130 with SMTP id k2mr229485bka.7.1280128455914;
        Mon, 26 Jul 2010 00:14:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.204.15.130 with SMTP id k2mr229484bka.7.1280128455866;
        Mon, 26 Jul 2010 00:14:15 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <timk...@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-fx0-f43.google.com (mail-fx0-f43.google.com [209.85.161.43])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id z25si1995119bku.1.2010.07.26.00.14.14;
        Mon, 26 Jul 2010 00:14:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of timk...@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.43 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.161.43;
Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of timk...@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.43 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=timk...@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header...@gmail.com
Received: by fxm18 with SMTP id 18so7331888fxm.2
        for <gtasks-by-dato@googlegroups.com>; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 00:14:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:received
         :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        bh=M/sFnSMmtrDqfacsWQmdDrKPavUa4g7fdK7Vuhm07zY=;
        b=Mc3c/65UrWOAVqiQ2XhFa9vs1T4NhQqGgN+VHbMXCrVTqTGd53fGJOrNne/aUz8asY
         hCLNmW2VAeT6+wBDDQZIG4zT20KTf0nFg+3v2w2aug0xo77EnNBF/ZoxAEV5aeLh6dXk
         uV5Qpbpqa72j1j6rsQlXxotyJKka8z3P5I/0U=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        b=M4164Q16qJ1veEkX+Iqhw6vWkRRMOEalQGTTryFNGhF92cT/d5Ev/8bUW1yfoezYx6
         +FpQ1PZrBZ+QT1TB6cwHTWFKzzWgPxiMvpJ6sxc8/MAD396IGMRQWUXXSLWV7WtJ6izu
         v5/K/QCnTpBPwU+ctDIbTjHcAQ5+nq8gn5FSM=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.223.115.194 with SMTP id j2mr5863309faq.47.1280128448929; Mon, 
	26 Jul 2010 00:14:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.223.138.148 with HTTP; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 00:14:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.223.138.148 with HTTP; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 00:14:08 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <e0ddbf07-5899-4273-917a-893edd952...@x18g2000pro.googlegroups.com>
References: <AANLkTikojjD2xKN4gokNwUHTj5xTvdaAi6-UQ9eah...@mail.gmail.com>
	<8c8e829b-d5fd-48a1-894a-c70289f17...@u26g2000yqu.googlegroups.com>
	<e0ddbf07-5899-4273-917a-893edd952...@x18g2000pro.googlegroups.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 17:14:08 +1000
Message-ID: <AANLkTikkh-xKgp6FMB0tthdNbkmMt=miTGeZTQDmj...@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: We plan to add Ads to the free version and also provide the paid 
	version
From: Tim Ho <timk...@gmail.com>
To: gtasks-by-dato@googlegroups.com
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636d34e22772061048c4521b7

--001636d34e22772061048c4521b7
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Exactly. 7 bucks is far too much. In fact the price amuses me! By the way,
since updating to the latest version, Gtasks regularly throws a java
exception and dies. If it is a free software, I won't complain. However,
considering the price, reliability and feature set, I won't pay for it. Ad
version for me.

Anyway, thanks for this app. It is a good one and has lots of potential. I
am sure it will get better and hopefully with a more realistic price . I am
sure it is only a matter of time when a better and cheaper  competitor
arrives.

Cheers,
Tim

Sent from my Android phone

On 26/07/2010 4:39 PM, "Vulpix" <vulpi...@gmail.com> wrote:

I agree with kongo. 6.99 is way too much for the application.


On Jul 26, 9:19 am, kongo09 <kong...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I support paid apps happily. However, pric...

--001636d34e22772061048c4521b7
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<p>Exactly. 7 bucks is far too much. In fact the price amuses me! By the wa=
y, since updating to the latest version, Gtasks regularly throws a java exc=
eption and dies. If it is a free software, I won&#39;t complain. However, c=
onsidering the price, reliability and feature set, I won&#39;t pay for it. =
Ad version for me.</p>

<p>Anyway, thanks for this app. It is a good one and has lots of potential.=
 I am sure it will get better and hopefully with a more realistic price . I=
 am sure it is only a matter of time when a better and cheaper=C2=A0 compet=
itor arrives.<br>

 <br>
Cheers,<br>
Tim</p>
<p>Sent from my Android phone</p>
<p><blockquote type=3D"cite">On 26/07/2010 4:39 PM, &quot;Vulpix&quot; &lt;=
<a href=3D"mailto:vulpi...@gmail.com">vulpi...@gmail.com</a>&gt; wrote:<br>=
<br>I agree with kongo. 6.99 is way too much for the application.<br>
<p><font color=3D"#500050"><br>On Jul 26, 9:19=C2=A0am, kongo09 &lt;<a href=
=3D"mailto:kong...@gmail.com">kong...@gmail.com</a>&gt; wrote:<br>&gt; I su=
pport paid apps happily. However, pric...</font></p></blockquote></p>

--001636d34e22772061048c4521b7--