Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon.
Switch to the new Google Groups.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
gsb policykit problem with shutdown under slackware-12.2
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  4 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
kitelau@gmail.com  
View profile  
 More options Feb 4 2009, 12:02 am
From: "kite...@gmail.com" <kite...@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 21:02:01 -0800 (PST)
Local: Wed, Feb 4 2009 12:02 am
Subject: gsb policykit problem with shutdown under slackware-12.2
Hi,

Would you please check this thread and help, thanks.

The link:
http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/slackware-14/gsb-policylit-an...

Best regards,

Kite


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Chris Vine  
View profile  
 More options Feb 5 2009, 4:33 pm
From: Chris Vine <ch...@cvine.freeserve.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 21:33:04 +0000
Local: Thurs, Feb 5 2009 4:33 pm
Subject: Re: gsb policykit problem with shutdown under slackware-12.2
On Tue, 3 Feb 2009 21:02:01 -0800 (PST)

"kite...@gmail.com" <kite...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,

> Would you please check this thread and help, thanks.

> The link:
> http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/slackware-14/gsb-policylit-an...

> Best regards,

You need to undo patch 01-dbus_policy.patch which GSB applies
to /etc/dbus-1/share/ConsoleKit.conf.  By default ConsoleKit will
allow you to shutdown from the desktop but GSB policy appears to be
that you should only do so by going back to the display manager (gdm).
As I say, to change this just unapply the patch.

Chris


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Chris Vine  
View profile  
 More options Feb 5 2009, 5:31 pm
From: Chris Vine <ch...@cvine.freeserve.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 22:31:36 +0000
Local: Thurs, Feb 5 2009 5:31 pm
Subject: Re: [GSB-Users] Re: gsb policykit problem with shutdown under slackware-12.2
On Thu, 5 Feb 2009 21:33:04 +0000

By the way, on a different but related point, I notice on the thread to
which you refer that people have been fiddling with hal policy files
in /usr/share/PolicyKit/policy.  That is pointless, because hal does
not use them unless compiled against PolicyKit - instead access to hal
services via the system bus is only determined by the dbus rules.  As
some of these policy files come with GSB possibly the GSB developers
intend to recompile hal against PolicyKit as a replacement package for
the one which comes with Slackware in due course.

Likewise the hal configuration for mountable devices in
/etc/PolicyKit/PolicyKit.conf which comes with GSB won't do anything
at present (but it doesn't need to as the dbus system rule is fine).

The gnome policy files in /usr/share/PolicyKit/policy (and any
entries for them you add to /etc/PolicyKit/PolicyKit.conf) will however
be used by gnome, such as for network manager.

I think PolicyKit is a pain in the a**e, so although it is needed if
you want gnome-2.24 to work in an acceptable way, I personally would not
compile PolicyKit into hal (which is not required by gnome)

Chris


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Steve  
View profile  
 More options May 3 2009, 7:26 am
From: "Steve" <st...@gnomeslackbuild.org>
Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 11:26:43 -0000 (GMT)
Local: Sun, May 3 2009 7:26 am
Subject: Re: [GSB-Users] Re: gsb policykit problem with shutdown under slackware-12.2

Hello!  It's a little late to jump in on this now, but I suppose better
late than never.

At the moment, we are not considering recompiling HAL against policykit,
and aim to replace as few packages as possible in order to prevent any
breakages or introducing any bugs.  We include HAL policies in the
policykit because some apps assume that when they find polkit, they will
have a polkit-enabled hal, and then complain when they can't find its
policies.  Though they are included, these hal policies are largely
ignored;  but some apps still try to look for them.

PolicyKit/Consolekit packages have got a major revamp for gsb 2.26, and
they look like they are working quite well now (even logging off from the
menu!  ;)  I just didn't have enough time to put towards 2.24, and franky
the upstream software was partially broken and it was taking lots of
effort to sort it all out.  With 2.26, it looks like things have
stabilised a bit.

Also, I just wanted to thank those in the discussion; it always helps to
have others' comments on this stuff.  Policykit is an unforunate
requirement for a lot of new gnome software, so including is slowly become
an absolute necessity.  gsb will try to stay as close as possible to
Slackware's ethos of simplicity, but sometimes the rest of the world just
won't follow along.  :)

Cheers,

--
-= Steve =-


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »