http://groups.google.com/group/growldiscuss Discussion list for Growl 2008-07-24T15:50:14Z Google Groups Peter Hosey p...@growl.info 2008-07-24T15:50:14Z http://groups.google.com/group/growldiscuss/browse_thread/thread/957460015b57f1e7/02eb51e9bed7af96?show_docid=02eb51e9bed7af96

Please send us *all* the lines that appear when you launch <br> HardwareGrowler.

kevs kt...@roadrunner.com 2008-07-24T15:49:16Z http://groups.google.com/group/growldiscuss/browse_thread/thread/957460015b57f1e7/b1b035f5a801caf0?show_docid=b1b035f5a801caf0

Here is last line: <br> <p>Jul 24 08:47:51 kens-power-mac-g5 diskarbitrationd[83]: GrowlHelperApp <br> [393]:52227 not responding. <br> <p>Still does not launch

Emmanuel Blot manu.b...@gmail.com 2008-07-24T13:36:41Z http://groups.google.com/group/growldiscuss/browse_thread/thread/b7829f25e3a40766/dbdcb772b5f11551?show_docid=dbdcb772b5f11551

Something nice with UDP is that you can broadcast notification onto a <br> LAN, so that multiple OS X machines receive the same notification. The <br> emitter does not have to know the receivers. You can't achieve this <br> with TCP protocol, as its a point-to-point protocol. <br> TCP uses a handshake protocol, i.e. the receiver must acknowledge a

Peter Hosey p...@growl.info 2008-07-24T13:09:42Z http://groups.google.com/group/growldiscuss/browse_thread/thread/b7829f25e3a40766/e7cdecb300e3f2ee?show_docid=e7cdecb300e3f2ee

What do you mean by this? <br> What do you mean by this?

Emmanuel Blot manu.b...@gmail.com 2008-07-24T13:07:52Z http://groups.google.com/group/growldiscuss/browse_thread/thread/b7829f25e3a40766/ca3f56ffc65aca4e?show_docid=ca3f56ffc65aca4e

Oh ;-( <br> This would prevent from broadcasting notifications, which can be a <br> useful feature. <br> Moreover it will require a more complex implementation on the emitter <br> side, to deal w/ timing issues. It may be not an issue with <br> Growl-based implementation, but it will be with simpler <br> implementations that generate the Growl notification message without

Peter Hosey p...@growl.info 2008-07-24T12:59:25Z http://groups.google.com/group/growldiscuss/browse_thread/thread/b7829f25e3a40766/e2e6a56d19c4e37c?show_docid=e2e6a56d19c4e37c

For now. I want the TCP-based protocol to take the place of both of <br> the current protocols, but we'll want to keep them around for awhile <br> for compatibility (especially as other notification systems still use <br> the UDP-based forwarding protocol). <br> No.

Emmanuel Blot manu.b...@gmail.com 2008-07-24T12:51:26Z http://groups.google.com/group/growldiscuss/browse_thread/thread/b7829f25e3a40766/d5614ced65984540?show_docid=d5614ced65984540

Great! Will you keep both UDP and TCP protocols? <br> Any schedule yet? <br> I mean, is this something that is expected by the end of the year, or <br> it is a long term feature? <br> Cheers, <br> Manu

Peter Hosey p...@growl.info 2008-07-24T12:04:58Z http://groups.google.com/group/growldiscuss/browse_thread/thread/b7829f25e3a40766/f65040e36573ea39?show_docid=f65040e36573ea39

No. <br> Yes.

Ian Roberts i.robe...@dcs.shef.ac.uk 2008-07-24T10:57:41Z http://groups.google.com/group/growldiscuss/browse_thread/thread/70d0dde10c29eb0f/7ee3e4e6dea9ad12?show_docid=7ee3e4e6dea9ad12

Or indeed the built-in connection sharing ability of openssh, see <br> ControlMaster and ControlPath in man ssh_config. <br> Ian

Ian Roberts i.robe...@dcs.shef.ac.uk 2008-07-24T10:35:47Z http://groups.google.com/group/growldiscuss/browse_thread/thread/70d0dde10c29eb0f/2e97268f3bd9b1f8?show_docid=2e97268f3bd9b1f8

To be honest, your easiest solution might just be to use &quot;ssh <br> my.mac.local growlnotify ....&quot;. To avoid having to establish a whole <br> SSH connection every time try fsh (<a target="_blank" rel=nofollow href="http://www.lysator.liu.se/fsh/">[link]</a>, <br> available as a package in most Linux distros and through macports on OS <br> X, it needs to be installed on both sides of the link), which is a

Emmanuel Blot manu.b...@gmail.com 2008-07-24T09:19:26Z http://groups.google.com/group/growldiscuss/browse_thread/thread/b7829f25e3a40766/e3d93c3e27684197?show_docid=e3d93c3e27684197

A bit off-topic, but it seems it's not possible to send an <br> image/icon/etc. embedded into a UDP Growl notification message. <br> Is it possible? or will you add this feature ? <br> Thanks, <br> Manu

Chris Forsythe ch...@growl.info 2008-07-24T01:28:29Z http://groups.google.com/group/growldiscuss/browse_thread/thread/70d0dde10c29eb0f/91fb651a27de7472?show_docid=91fb651a27de7472

Ah, I missed that part. However, I'm sure there's a way to tunnel udp, <br> just not over ssh tunnels. <br> Chris

Peter Hosey p...@growl.info 2008-07-23T23:43:42Z http://groups.google.com/group/growldiscuss/browse_thread/thread/70d0dde10c29eb0f/e334e852146dba56?show_docid=e334e852146dba56

Will those work over an SSH tunnel?

Chris Forsythe ch...@growl.info 2008-07-23T23:44:03Z http://groups.google.com/group/growldiscuss/browse_thread/thread/70d0dde10c29eb0f/b74725ffc5317e68?show_docid=b74725ffc5317e68

Or you could always just use one of the random network scripts that <br> people use to send notifications from other platforms via perl, <br> python, ruby, tcl, etc etc. We ship some in the sdk if I remember right. <br> Chris

Evan Schoenberg eva...@dreskin.net 2008-07-23T22:28:37Z http://groups.google.com/group/growldiscuss/browse_thread/thread/70d0dde10c29eb0f/59b588bc8a833e07?show_docid=59b588bc8a833e07

Oops, yes. In my previous email I said &quot;in this space,&quot; but I had <br> misread and thought we were on growl-development. The discussion will <br> take place on growl-development, not on growl-discuss, though growl- <br> discuss will receive an announcement if/when anything is finalized. <br> Cheers, <br> Evan