Received: by 10.204.103.76 with SMTP id j12mr205366bko.18.1295796581417;
        Sun, 23 Jan 2011 07:29:41 -0800 (PST)
X-BeenThere: growing-object-oriented-software@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.204.179.8 with SMTP id bo8ls1207520bkb.1.p; Sun, 23 Jan 2011
 07:29:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.204.120.141 with SMTP id d13mr209433bkr.21.1295796579409;
        Sun, 23 Jan 2011 07:29:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.204.120.141 with SMTP id d13mr209432bkr.21.1295796579389;
        Sun, 23 Jan 2011 07:29:39 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <uberto.g...@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-fx0-f47.google.com (mail-fx0-f47.google.com [209.85.161.47])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id dd11si2090968bkb.4.2011.01.23.07.29.38
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5);
        Sun, 23 Jan 2011 07:29:38 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of uberto.g...@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.47 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.161.47;
Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of uberto.g...@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.47 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=uberto.g...@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header...@gmail.com
Received: by fxm17 with SMTP id 17so3325995fxm.20
        for <growing-object-oriented-software@googlegroups.com>; Sun, 23 Jan 2011 07:29:38 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from
         :date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=flMgnkLLHOWuglz7T0A2XB+XqmYLhMKKW2Nh3+eukbI=;
        b=rlax2W4LuMWtqU2iVBiqRVJL66kt8kwSatMXKPl37btIP73OaWVZo4gUGJyc2Rgels
         Vy5K6YY9WlPoIC06PC0ZFDWntz3W6BS04rzxM+er/lmqrj/uxONLfjDYCugNbc6jVXmV
         Avr59joztexB5JMNzt6hOGfdrvrDu/oKKoqlo=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date
         :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        b=U7yIvDYrxFp8wTH8u7aQAjvU12/nFTeUmihq3oUr/8WXyY++4A2rO8bX3eyszrEhch
         s1/EFv7pAdVtVPRABXPQAQDi4r0FAL98OAy/Zt+zV39xNI1NIZErWnawmLqjpW4YA1BF
         43G5ShTkEQeZaRnzYL29t1LKGA4INHYooLKXc=
Received: by 10.103.243.20 with SMTP id v20mr869492mur.58.1295796577991; Sun,
 23 Jan 2011 07:29:37 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: uberto.g...@gmail.com
Received: by 10.103.212.3 with HTTP; Sun, 23 Jan 2011 07:29:16 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimdR4PyDW-=jfRAfX=29ads=V8Dpuw4_MDyv...@mail.gmail.com>
References: <dbcace17-41c6-4102-849f-610419783...@l22g2000vbp.googlegroups.com>
 <74a4867f-f00b-4e49-86bc-7febea1d9...@k30g2000vbn.googlegroups.com>
 <AANLkTindKdoQnVE_f5YKZHc_ko8yokrvHV3U2qJqO...@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTimdR4PyDW-=jfRAfX=29ads=V8Dpuw4_MDyv...@mail.gmail.com>
From: Uberto Barbini <ube...@ubiland.net>
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2011 16:29:16 +0100
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=ir3C3VN-iaWH0WMtkbv8Tq_=MXY8LdE-MB...@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [GOOS] Re: "Classic TDD or 'London School'?" - any
 opinions/comments/elaboration on Jason Gorman's post?
To: growing-object-oriented-software@googlegroups.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I rechecked and it was on "Test-Driven Development", page 144-5.

cheers
Uberto

On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Philip Schwarz
<philip.johann.schw...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Hi Uberto,
> you said:JMock is a nice library to do what KB preaches on mocking
> in=C2=A0"Implementation Patterns"
> There are no occurrences in the book of either 'mock' or 'stub'; can you
> point me to the pages/chapters in question?
> Philip
> On 23 January 2011 11:11, Uberto Barbini <ube...@ubiland.net> wrote:
>>
>> Maybe I'm dense but I cannot see any real difference between GOOS and
>> what Kent Beck, Michael Feathers and Ward Cunningham are writing (both
>> as code and books) since years.
>>
>> JMock is a nice library to do what KB preaches on mocking in
>> "Implementation Patterns"... still I wouldn't call it a "school" for
>> that.
>>
>> I also consider GOOS the book that is offering the best whole view of
>> software development. Other books are more about on specific
>> techniques.
>> So I think there is a "TDD done right school" and a "misunderstood TDD
>> school". But the first is not London specific... ;)
>>
>>
>> cheers
>>
>> Uberto
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 10:46 PM, philip schwarz
>> <philip.johann.schw...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> > Today Jason posted this screencast on "Classic TDD vs. London School":
>> > http://parlezuml.com/blog/?postid=3D994
>> >
>> > On Jan 8, 2:24=C2=A0pm, philip schwarz
>> > <philip.johann.schw...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> >> here is the post:http://parlezuml.com/blog/?postid=3D987
>
>