Web Images Videos Maps News Shopping Gmail more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
WILDSKY WA vs WILD HERITAGE CA
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  4 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post will appear after it is approved by moderators
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
thatsalarf  
View profile  
 More options Aug 11 2005, 9:56 am
From: "thatsalarf" <thest...@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 06:56:36 -0700
Local: Thurs, Aug 11 2005 9:56 am
Subject: WILDSKY WA vs WILD HERITAGE CA
Rural America they say, "Is where they take down all the trees and name
the streets after them."  Look around. This land needs to be protected
and past on to our childrens children. DO NOT let Ed Hussman and his
scare tactics keep us from saving earth from mans abuses. Once it is
gone, it is gone.
WE WILL NOT BE LOCKED OUT OF THIS LAND. WE WILL ONLY BE ABLE TO ENJOY
IT LONGER.

Write this guy. He is from Tracy, California. He is a Republican who
only wants to be re-elected. Do we really want a Californian making
decissions for Washington. Get involved,because those who are, ARE
making the decissions for you.

Richard W. Pombo
California-11th, Republican
2411 Rayburn HOB
Washington, DC 20515-0511
Phone: (202) 225-1947

Washington StatesCongressional Record: July 26, 2005 (Senate)]
[Page S9031-S9032]

>From the Congressional Record Online via GPO Access

[wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:cr26jy05-180]

                    WILD SKY WILDERNESS ACT OF 2005

  The Senate proceeded to consider the bill (S. 152) to enhance
ecosystem protection and the range of outdoor opportunities protected
by statute in the Skykomish River valley of the State of Washington by
designating certain lower-elevation Federal lands as wilderness, and
for other purposes, which had been reported from the Committee on
Energy and Natural Resources with amendments, as follows:
  [Strike the parts shown in black bracket and insert the parts shown
in italic.]

                                 S. 152

       Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of
     the United States of America in Congress assembled,

     SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

       This Act may be cited as the ``Wild Sky Wilderness Act of
     2005''.

     SEC. 2. ADDITIONS TO THE NATIONAL WILDERNESS PRESERVATION
                   SYSTEM.

       (a) Additions.--The following Federal lands in the State of
     Washington are hereby designated as wilderness and,
     therefore, as components of the National Wilderness
     Preservation System: certain lands which comprise
     approximately 106,000 acres, as generally depicted on a map
     entitled ``Wild Sky Wilderness Proposal'', ``Map #1'', and
     dated January 7, 2003, which shall be known [as the Wild Sky
     Wilderness.] as the ``Wild Sky Wilderness''.
       (b) Maps and Legal Descriptions.--As soon as practicable
     after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of
     Agriculture shall file a map and a legal description for the
     wilderness area designated under this Act with the Committee
     on Energy and Natural Resources of the [United States] Senate
     and the Committee on Resources of the [United States] House
     of Representatives. The map and description shall have the
     same force and effect as if included in this Act, except that
     the Secretary of Agriculture may correct clerical and
     typographical errors in the legal description and map. The
     map and legal description shall be on file and available for
     public inspection in the office of the Chief of the Forest
     Service, Department of Agriculture.

     SEC. 3. ADMINISTRATION PROVISIONS.

       (a) In General.--
       (1) Subject to valid existing rights, lands designated as
     wilderness by this Act shall be managed by the Secretary of
     Agriculture in accordance with the Wilderness Act (16 U.S.C.
     1131 et seq.) and this Act, except that, with respect to any
     wilderness areas designated by this Act, any reference in the
     Wilderness Act to the effective date of the Wilderness Act
     shall be deemed to be a reference to the date of enactment of
     this Act.
       (2) To fulfill the purposes of this Act and the Wilderness
     Act and to achieve administrative efficiencies, the Secretary
     of Agriculture may manage the area designated by this Act as
     a comprehensive part of the larger complex of adjacent and
     nearby wilderness areas.
       (b) New Trails.--
       (1) The Secretary of Agriculture shall consult with
     interested parties and shall establish a trail plan for
     Forest Service lands in order to [develop:] develop--
       (A) a system of hiking and equestrian trails within the
     wilderness designated by this Act in a manner consistent with
     the Wilderness Act[, Public Law 88-577] (16 U.S.C. 1131 et
     seq.); and
       (B) a system of trails adjacent to or to provide access to
     the wilderness designated by this Act.
       (2) Within two years after the date of enactment of this
     Act, the Secretary of Agriculture shall complete a report on
     the implementation of the trail plan required under this Act.
     This report shall include the identification of priority
     [trail] trails for development.
       (c) Repeater Site.--Within the Wild Sky Wilderness, the
     Secretary of Agriculture is authorized to use helicopter
     access to construct and maintain a joint Forest Service

[[Page S9032]]

     and Snohomish County telecommunications repeater site, in
     compliance with a Forest Service approved communications site
     plan, for the purposes of improving communications for
     safety, health, and emergency services.
       (d) Float Plane Access.--As provided by section 4(d)(1) of
     the Wilderness Act (16 U.S.C. 1133(d)(1)), the use of
     floatplanes on Lake Isabel, where such use has already become
     established, shall be permitted to continue subject to such
     reasonable restrictions as the Secretary of Agriculture
     determines to be desirable. END

Californias
Congressional Record: July 26, 2005 (Senate)]
[Page S9047-S9049]

>From the Congressional Record Online via GPO Access

[wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:cr26jy05-197]

        NORTHERN CALIFORNIA COASTAL WILD HERITAGE WILDERNESS ACT

  The Senate proceeded to consider the bill (S. 128) to designate
certain public land in Humboldt, Del Norte, Mendocino, Lake, and Napa
Counties in the State of California as wilderness, to designate certain

segments of the Black Butte River in Mendocino County, California as a
wild or scenic river, and for other purposes.

                                 S. 128

       Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of
     the United States of America in Congress assembled,

     SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

       This Act may be cited as the ``Northern California Coastal
     Wild Heritage Wilderness Act''.

     SEC. 2. DEFINITION OF SECRETARY.

       In this Act, the term ``Secretary'' means--
       (1) with respect to land under the jurisdiction of the
     Secretary of Agriculture, the Secretary of Agriculture; and
       (2) with respect to land under the jurisdiction of the
     Secretary of the Interior, the Secretary of the Interior.

     SEC. 3. DESIGNATION OF WILDERNESS AREAS.

       In accordance with the Wilderness Act (16 U.S.C. 1131 et
     seq.), the following areas in the State of California are
     designated as wilderness areas and as components of the
     National Wilderness Preservation System:
       (1) Snow mountain wilderness addition.--
       (A) In general.--Certain land in the Mendocino National
     Forest, comprising approximately 23,312 acres, as generally
     depicted on the maps described in subparagraph (B), is
     incorporated in and shall considered to be a part of the
     ``Snow Mountain Wilderness'', as designated by section
     101(a)(31) of the California Wilderness Act of 1984 (16
     U.S.C. 1132 note; Public Law 98-425).
       (B) Description of maps.--The maps referred to in
     subparagraph (A) are--
       (i) the map entitled ``Skeleton Glade Unit, Snow Mountain
     Proposed Wilderness Addition, Mendocino National Forest'' and
     dated September 17, 2004; and
       (ii) the map entitled ``Bear Creek/Deafy Glade Unit, Snow
     Mountain Wilderness Addition, Mendocino National Forest'' and
     dated September 17, 2004.
       (2) Sanhedrin wilderness.--Certain land in the Mendocino
     National Forest, comprising approximately 10,571 acres, as
     generally depicted on the map entitled ``Sanhedrin Proposed
     Wilderness, Mendocino National Forest'' and dated September
     17, 2004, which shall be known as the ``Sanhedrin
     Wilderness''.
       (3) Yuki wilderness.--Certain land in the Mendocino
     National Forest and certain land administered by the Bureau
     of Land Management in Lake and Mendocino Counties,
     California, together comprising approximately 54,087 acres,
     as generally depicted on the map entitled ``Yuki Proposed
     Wilderness'' and dated October 28, 2004, which shall be known
     as the ``Yuki Wilderness''.
       (4) Yolla bolly-middle eel wilderness addition.--Certain
     land in the Mendocino National Forest and certain land
     administered by the Bureau of Land Management in Mendocino
     County, California, together comprising approximately 25,806
     acres, as generally depicted on the map entitled ``Middle
     Fork Eel, Smokehouse and Big Butte Units, Yolla Bolly-Middle
     Eel Proposed Wilderness Addition'' and dated October 28,
     2004, is incorporated in and shall considered to be a part of
     the Yolla Bolly-Middle Eel Wilderness, as designated by
     section 3 of the Wilderness Act (16 U.S.C. 1132).
       (5) Mad river buttes wilderness.--Certain land in the Six
     Rivers National Forest, comprising approximately 6,494 acres,
     as generally depicted on the map entitled ``Mad River Buttes,
     Mad River Proposed Wilderness'' and dated September 17, 2004,
     which shall be known as the ``Mad River Buttes Wilderness''.
       (6) Siskiyou wilderness addition.--
       (A) In general.--Certain land in the Six Rivers National
     Forest, comprising approximately 48,754
...

read more »


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Old Timer  
View profile  
 More options Aug 11 2005, 7:57 pm
From: "Old Timer" <Jose_J...@hotmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 16:57:42 -0700
Local: Thurs, Aug 11 2005 7:57 pm
Subject: Re: WILDSKY WA vs WILD HERITAGE CA
So, can I hunt on this land? can I ride a dirt bike on this land? Can
my handicapped mother drive around this area?

What about in the winter, can I ride snowmobiles in this area?

maybe you think these things are not important, and that they have no
place in the wilderness, but it is how I enjoy it... So, I will not be
writing in favor of this action...


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Group Owner  
View profile  
 More options Aug 12 2005, 8:52 am
From: "Group Owner" <g...@direcway.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 05:52:20 -0700
Local: Fri, Aug 12 2005 8:52 am
Subject: Re: WILDSKY WA vs WILD HERITAGE CA
By asking those questions, the conclusions you have drawn are partially
correct.  You will NOT be able to ride dirt bikes or use motorized
vehicles (which includes ATVs and Snowmobiles) in the Wild
Sky-designated area.

However, you WILL still be able to hunt in Wild Sky because the
underlying federal land designation is NATIONAL FOREST, not NATIONAL
PARK (in which hunting is forbidden). Also, your handicapped mom (if
you do really have one), will still be able to drive around the area.
The majority of the roads currently being maintained and drivable will
still remain open.  Additionally, Wild Sky is surrounded by many
thousands of pristine acres in which recreational activities requiring
motorized vehicles can be actively pursued and enjoyed.

So what other activities can people pursue in Wild Sky?  You can hunt,
fish, hike, camp, go picnicking and backpacking, take walks with your
dog(s), swim, ride your horse, cross-country ski, snowshoe, rock-climb,
go kayaking and canoeing, bird-watch, take wildflower walks and perform
ecological research and educational programs.

However, Wild Sky is not about what one CANNOT do within it.  It is
about saving a piece of nature for our children, grandchildren,
great-grandchildren and many countless future generations to enjoy so
that it will still exist long after we are all gone to dust. At the
rate we are using and abusing our natural resources, setting aside
pristine areas like this should be a human mandate. (Imagine what would
have happened to Central Park in New York had it not been set aside; or
all the National Parks in the U.S.  We ALL know the answer to that
one.)  Unfortunately, this issue has purposefully been escalated into a
whipping boy rallying cry for a small minority of vocal pro-property
rights activists who are using it as a soadbox for their
turn-of-the-century (1900, not 2000) philosophy.

Please check GRIT's Wild Sky page on which is contained detailed
material on the Wilderness, especially the FAQ sheet.


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
thatsalarf  
View profile  
 More options Aug 14 2005, 11:07 pm
From: "thatsalarf" <thest...@earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2005 20:07:01 -0700
Local: Sun, Aug 14 2005 11:07 pm
Subject: Re: WILDSKY WA vs WILD HERITAGE CA
                WILD SKY WILDERNESS ACT OF 2005

  The Senate proceeded to consider the bill (S. 152) to enhance
ecosystem protection and the range of outdoor opportunities

How can you disagree with this?  To "Enhance means increase in value.
To add to the effect. It is written in the act. it is our job to make
sure the Feds follow thru.

Maybe you think this is not important. But I like to park near the
front door at the mall at Christmas time.But I can't. ......Because the
The American Disability Act allows your mother the right to do so. Her
life is "enhanced" by the Act of Congress.
Except for the fact that I agree with the ADA. I  can't park in the
front row becaused it is for you mom and millions of other Americans
with disabilities. WE  SAVE IT FOR THEM.
Why can't we SAVE a little of mother earth for those unborn? Reserve a
little for the next guy? It is the only planet we've got.


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google