Gmail Calendar Documents Reader Web more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
Marysville School bond! Round - 171
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  1 message - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post will appear after it is approved by moderators
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Nick  
View profile  
 More options Jun 15 2005, 6:18 am
From: "Nick" <aresamplesca...@aol.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 03:18:56 -0700
Local: Wed, Jun 15 2005 6:18 am
Subject: Marysville School bond! Round - 171
    HeraldNet: Marysville bond will go to voters again

 http://www.heraldnet.com/stories/05/06/14/100loc_bond001.cfm

   Round two coming up!
   With Snohomish County dodging the Governors race bullet, by not
having to reveal how bad it's own flawed election results were!
   Why not save money by announcing the winning results now?

   You don't give away the City's UGA keys to the County's non-elected
ruler, knowing full well any new schools built, will be obsolete.

   Get real, the City's planning department has forced this artificial
need onto it's own taxpayers, for nothing more then money. It's
certainly wasn't with current school children's best interests in mind!

   By opening up, and expanding it's UGA to thousands of new homes,
only to appease the County ruler, will render this $171 million monster
obsolete with the very first brick laid in place.

   They could *Trump* the rulers plans of uncontrolled development, by
using responsible growth planning. The GMA's target population is well
over a decade away. Trying to reach that population target yesterday,
only shows the pure greed, not true need by City Hall.
                            Nick


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2010 Google