Message from discussion
Greasemonkey update?
Received: by 10.35.13.4 with SMTP id q4mr6129767pyi.1194742844881;
Sat, 10 Nov 2007 17:00:44 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <zbo...@gmail.com>
Received: from fk-out-0910.google.com (fk-out-0910.google.com [209.85.128.184])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id z53si9538128pyg.2007.11.10.17.00.44;
Sat, 10 Nov 2007 17:00:44 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of zbo...@gmail.com designates 209.85.128.184 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.128.184;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of zbo...@gmail.com designates 209.85.128.184 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=zbo...@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header...@gmail.com
Received: by fk-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id z22so1090801fkz
for <greasemonkey-dev@googlegroups.com>; Sat, 10 Nov 2007 17:00:43 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=beta;
h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth;
bh=PMigHb0tq5kfq+JOSPYbJh32TjZ/VvW+0LecoScaVuk=;
b=a2EEHF4s4ezgaE/H5Ex5fNWyyXE5+5WCMZMm2mvbgCWmkJ5Dx1REFq2/KIpZ4zHnzo8MGDCPE+bPyaN0kz7SVYEipV/68XV6UJ4QKN2fCVGgnxxoqofBwHDHWo0k26cYxOyJ09S1WIgQJ1vWQJl1utK8FdlLERD5Uq0/WXMm0Qw=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=gmail.com; s=beta;
h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth;
b=F/CItYY4H8yY+vs/dIwDIMyoXZvQR/HeZIUk3peIsB9/RYJloau+lzzIRVdGnsszEZeIesN0jwAkpsP3uZN8GhyDRAop7R+4Nfa4r8awQ9SxNdgRivmwdwDhV38o4WNl/ATa6Q0+EOjXmgVHebUXQt4UgV8VBTOmv6IM/4A9FpQ=
Received: by 10.82.189.6 with SMTP id m6mr8112970buf.1194742842846;
Sat, 10 Nov 2007 17:00:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.82.186.1 with HTTP; Sat, 10 Nov 2007 17:00:42 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <f3e92ae50711101700o382f3311xe8048619cfd6690a@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2007 17:00:42 -0800
From: "Aaron Boodman" <bo...@youngpup.net>
Sender: zbo...@gmail.com
To: greasemonkey-dev@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [greasemonkey-dev] Re: Greasemonkey update?
In-Reply-To: <1194635049.615645.318...@z9g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
References: <1191867776.341009.230...@d55g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>
<470A7F8A.3040...@gmail.com>
<1194635049.615645.318...@z9g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>
The greasemonkey website is now back up. Must have been a temporary
Blogger glitch.
As for the original question, it's clear I need to loosen my grip on
Greasemonkey. I don't have the time to review every patch, and
blocking on me stifled all that creativity we had going for a little
while.
For now, Gareth, go ahead and merge your @import branch into trunk and
make a test build from trunk for us to play with. Once we work out all
the bugs, we can do a new release with that plus FF3 support.
After that, I want to start relying on you all more to review changes.
Since it is a small group of us that work on GM, we can probably just
do something simple, like:
* Send out a patch/branch
* If somebody else reviews it and thinks it looks good, and nobody
else thinks it looks bad, then submit
We'll see how that goes. My hope is that a core group of developers
evolves to maintain Greasemonkey and I can fade more and more into the
background.
- a
On 11/9/07, Lord Pas <pasthe...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Oct 8, 8:05 pm, Anthony Lieuallen <arant...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 10/8/2007 2:22 PM, matrixik wrote:
> >
> > > When can we expect greasemonkey update? In the month, 3 months, the
> > > year, never?
> >
> > Update for what? If there's no new features and no active bugs, then of
> > course there's no new update.
>
> Hello,
>
> Any news for Firefox 3 (Minefield) compatibility? I can't install/add/
> edit scripts, but GM appears to be working..
>
> Sorry for charging in on this, but the greasespot.com blog seems to be
> dead :C
>
> Nice day,
> Pas
>
>
> >
>
|
