Workshy households which DOUBLED under Labour now on the way down

[Trueblue]

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2195174/Britain-340-000-households-EVER-job.html

 

Must send a chill through the socialist gullibles veins.

[tinman]

Where they gone on disability.

On 29 Aug, 22:01, Trueblue <V6jtrichar...@aim.com> wrote:
> http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2195174/Britain-340-000-house...

[Jonksy]

Yep most of them are pensioners now locky so it is fuck all to do with your lot.

[Trueblue]

On Wednesday, 29 August 2012 22:05:21 UTC+1, tinman wrote:

 

Where they gone on disability.

 

Steven Hawkins works

[tinman]

BWahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh. he is it's true he really really is.

[Jonksy]

in the USA locky..

[Trueblue]

On Wednesday, 29 August 2012 22:14:44 UTC+1, tinman wrote:

BWahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh. he is it's true he really really is.

 

Tonight is the opening of the Para Olympics, the vaste majority of whom hold down full time jobs, a report out earlier this work showed disabled people started more small business's by proportion than able bodied people, I recently had some building work done and the plasterer who did a perfect job was disabled, an ex squadi who'd lost half his leg in the Falklands

[GBur3]

But Pete, how can that be when every young woman knows that by having
children you can set yourself up in life? The tories have done FUCK
ALL about that - probably because the camoron doesn't want to get bad
mouthed on mumsnet.

On Aug 29, 10:01 pm, Trueblue <V6jtrichar...@aim.com> wrote:
> http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2195174/Britain-340-000-house...
>

[ewill]

Benefits are being limited to total £26k a year nett which will
adversely affect 600000 scroungers according to Labour and the
bishops.

Now I agree that's still nowhere near low enough and benefits should
never pay more than a maximum of half minimum wage but it's a start

> > Must send a chill through the socialist gullibles veins.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

[Trueblue]

On Wednesday, 29 August 2012 23:07:09 UTC+1, GBur3 wrote:

But Pete, how can that be when every young woman knows that by having
children you can set yourself up in life? The tories have done FUCK
ALL about that -

 

FFS Alex, they have inherited a bankrupt country in the biggest slump since records began with the highest welfare dependency in the world, welfare reforms are resisted by screaming banchies in the Liberal side of the Coalition and certainly by 100% of Labour who rely on welfare dependents for their support.

 

What you aruing for is the same as me, I would not pay a penny to chav teenage Jeremy Kyle mothers and before you jump on me, CLINTON stopped welfare for second bastards born to welfare dependents in the USA and guess what, the numbers of babies born to these welfare claiments dropped faster than the stock market under Labour

[Tiger]

Why are you referring to the babies born to these people in such a
derogatory manner, when in fact it is they that are the biggest
victims!

[Anthonychng]

£26,000? A fortune....at least it is to me. But then, having saved
all my working life, never been in debt (unless you count a
mortgage....long since paid off) and (daftly) invested in a private
pensions scheme, I don`t qualify for ANY benefit.....and still pay
income tax because my small private pensions takes me over the
limit.

> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

[Sandman]

And you believe that bullshit Blue, nothing to do with tory policies

needing some ONS backing is it, no mention of how they arrive at

these figures, did someone knock on doors to find out, it's a load

of crap that only the gullible will fall for.

 

On Wednesday, 29 August 2012 22:01:15 UTC+1, Trueblue wrote:

[Anthonychng]

There goes that word again "gullible". As for "arriving at figures"
isn`t that what all politicians do? Why mention Tories? Labour was
also very adept at massaging figures and calling them "statistics."
Possibly why we are in the mess we are in today. Truth well hidden
by the Grump Brown until he could hide it no longer. Maybe workshy
households ARE on the way down and, if that is so, not before time.
What did Labour do to bring those numbers down? Precious little,
just added to the benefits bill. "Keep quiet, maybe no-one will
notice."

On Aug 30, 3:30 pm, Sandman <joere...@aol.com> wrote:
> And you believe that bullshit Blue, nothing to do with tory policies
> needing some ONS backing is it, no mention of how they arrive at
> these figures, did someone knock on doors to find out, it's a load
> of crap that only the gullible will fall for.
>
>
>
> On Wednesday, 29 August 2012 22:01:15 UTC+1, Trueblue wrote:
>

[Affa]

On Friday, August 31, 2012 5:34:47 PM UTC+1, Anthonychng wrote:

   Maybe workshy households ARE on the way down and, if that is so, not before time.
What did Labour do to bring those numbers down?   Precious little,

 

 

 You applaude a minute (one months falling unemployment) under the coalition, and say Labour did "precious little", when it

reduced unemployment by approaching two million ......... 900,000 of those jobs in the PRIVATE SECTOR.

Do please recognise your own prejudices Anthony.

 

 

 

 

 

 

[jar]

WE are all aware of how Brown reduced the unemployment figure AFFA and you really cant expect to lecture people on their predjudices unless you are sure that you are free from them.

What amazes everyone apparently is that the private sector is employing as much as it is. In fact its more than compensating for the losses in the usual big gvt that brown favoured. Like you I expected it to increase and it probably will due to the international system. You cant help but laugh at the politicians because when one party finds itself in trouble financially it tells us its an international problem yet the opposition will have it that its  home grown one and the fauly of the gvt.

[Trueblue]

On Saturday, 1 September 2012 00:17:52 UTC+1, Affa wrote:

On Friday, August 31, 2012 5:34:47 PM UTC+1, Anthonychng wrote:

   Maybe workshy households ARE on the way down and, if that is so, not before time.
What did Labour do to bring those numbers down?   Precious little,

 

 

 You applaude a minute (one months falling unemployment) under the coalition,

 

Buts its not just one month is it Affa, its 6 months