How labour used millions of taxpayers money to silence whisleblowers exposing the crisis in the NHS which cost thousands of lifes

16 views
Skip to first unread message

Trueblue

unread,
Jun 30, 2012, 2:47:09 PM6/30/12
to GPPS (General Politics People and Society)

tinman

unread,
Jun 30, 2012, 2:58:53 PM6/30/12
to GPPS (General Politics People and Society)
If Cameron kept his personal PLEDGE to reduce immigration there would
be no NHS crises. Come on Cameron step up to the plate and tell us
again how your going to reduce immigration. Ops hang on nope thats
not whats happened is it. Its gone up by what percent.

On Jun 30, 7:47 pm, Trueblue <V6jtrichar...@aim.com> wrote:
> http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2166794/Gagged-NHS-Ex-Health-...

Trueblue

unread,
Jun 30, 2012, 3:20:47 PM6/30/12
to GPPS (General Politics People and Society)


On Jun 30, 7:58 pm, tinman <tinman080...@aol.com> wrote:
> If Cameron kept his personal PLEDGE to reduce immigration there would
> be no NHS crises.

So no comment on the corruption and devestation ofthe HS by Labour.

Affa

unread,
Jun 30, 2012, 5:15:17 PM6/30/12
to gpn-general-po...@googlegroups.com
 
A gagging order that has not gagged anyone?
A man who was fired and now makes exaggerated claims.
A newspaper that if it had patients interests at heart would be attacking the Lansley's reforms and listening to hundreds of doctors not one ex administrator.
 
NHS targets were introduced to focus attention on provision. It was administrators that shuffled patient care in order to meet targets more easily. A case of them keeping their jobs by manipulation of data statistics.
 
I hope this affair has legs ......... it cannot be allowed to appear and then disappear - which I suspect
is the intention.
 
 
 

Trueblue

unread,
Jun 30, 2012, 5:22:25 PM6/30/12
to GPPS (General Politics People and Society)


On Jun 30, 10:15 pm, Affa <Affajee...@aol.com> wrote:

> NHS targets were introduced to focus attention on provision.

Cleary Not.

Affa

unread,
Jun 30, 2012, 5:33:18 PM6/30/12
to gpn-general-po...@googlegroups.com

On Saturday, June 30, 2012 10:22:25 PM UTC+1, Trueblue wrote:



> NHS targets were introduced to focus attention on provision.

Cleary Not.

 
 The thing that is clear is that this politicised 'revelation' will do more harm to the Tories
than it will likely do to Labour ........ and your comment makes me suspect you realise that.
 
 

Trueblue

unread,
Jun 30, 2012, 5:42:50 PM6/30/12
to GPPS (General Politics People and Society)


On Jun 30, 10:33 pm, Affa <Affajee...@aol.com> wrote:

>  The thing that is clear is that this politicised 'revelation' will do more
> harm to the Tories
> than it will likely do to Labour ........ and your comment makes me suspect
> you realise that.

Why.?

jar

unread,
Jun 30, 2012, 5:47:39 PM6/30/12
to gpn-general-po...@googlegroups.com
Overnight tinman? you do come up with a load of tripe .

Jonksy

unread,
Jun 30, 2012, 6:07:07 PM6/30/12
to gpn-general-po...@googlegroups.com
Well you would know all about tripe old man..

Affa

unread,
Jun 30, 2012, 6:08:51 PM6/30/12
to gpn-general-po...@googlegroups.com

On Saturday, June 30, 2012 10:42:50 PM UTC+1, Trueblue wrote:


>  The thing that is clear is that this politicised 'revelation' will do more
> harm to the Tories
> than it will likely do to Labour ........ and your comment makes me suspect
> you realise that.

Why.?

 
 LOL ......... The Tories want to stop legislation to prevent whistleblowers?
 Neither do they desire any debate that mentions patient care, waiting times, waiting lists, or
numbers .......... an investigation can only draw attention to failures, then and now.
 
 I repeat ...... targets have the intention of improving health care and delivery. Administrators are to blame for any manipulation of those priorities in order to improve apparent success ........ by organising theatre usage to do minor operations that reach the target faster, and cheaper.
The solution - more accountability, more scrutiny, more none-jobs.
The Tories would detest that outcome!
 
 
.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  

jar

unread,
Jun 30, 2012, 6:11:24 PM6/30/12
to gpn-general-po...@googlegroups.com
I know you post tripe jonsky and its so very easy to recognise it for what it is.(idiot)

Trueblue

unread,
Jun 30, 2012, 6:13:51 PM6/30/12
to GPPS (General Politics People and Society)


You'll have noticed Jar the gullibles will never comment or condem
the attrocities of their beloved Socialist party

jar

unread,
Jun 30, 2012, 6:17:23 PM6/30/12
to gpn-general-po...@googlegroups.com
Theres no bounds to your preference for blaming the Tories Affa is there dont you recall the whistleblowers that caught a cropper before 2010. By what they do they create powerful enemies who are able to get their revenge from those they expose. you are trying to politicise it for some reason maybe you see it as another opportunity to have a jibe at your unfavourite party. save your jibes for something worthwhile there are many choices and they wouldnt make the present ones so silly . Careful as you will be rated with the Jonskys and tinmans of this world.

jar

unread,
Jun 30, 2012, 6:19:37 PM6/30/12
to gpn-general-po...@googlegroups.com
Difficult to avoid the obvious TB far easier for them to find even the most pathetic excuses to have a go at the Tories. They arnt strong enough to be good losers.

Affa

unread,
Jun 30, 2012, 6:36:23 PM6/30/12
to gpn-general-po...@googlegroups.com


On Saturday, June 30, 2012 11:17:23 PM UTC+1, jar wrote:

 
Theres no bounds to your preference for blaming the Tories Affa
 
 I'm not blaming the Tories for anything, yet. They haven't had enough time to screw
things up too much, but Lansley is working on it.
What I say is from past knowledge of what Tory NHS provision means, and
can confidently claim, it hasn't altered for the better.
It was the Blair government that legislated to protect whistleblowers ......... Cameron would likely prefer
it was repealed.
 
 
 

ewill

unread,
Jun 30, 2012, 8:12:48 PM6/30/12
to GPPS (General Politics People and Society)
Whistleblowing has been protected in law since the 70's when Roche had
to settle with Stanley Adams after the EEC released his name to the
employer

Jonksy

unread,
Jul 1, 2012, 2:55:31 AM7/1/12
to gpn-general-po...@googlegroups.com
Come back when you have something to say jar rather than your usual dumbarse comments. So tell us jar what's it like trying to defend a lying incompetent bunch of tossers who sold you down the river and apart from higher immigration, higher unemployment, higher borrowing, higher taxes and higher overseas aid and a double dip recession have achieved zilch?

jar

unread,
Jul 1, 2012, 3:32:23 AM7/1/12
to gpn-general-po...@googlegroups.com
NHS is badly in need of modernisation and was typically Socialist in overemploying managers and unemployed local staff. I have seen that for myself whilst in an out of London hospital whilst having tests. We know that despite extra gvt funding which I presume goes to PFI trusts as opposed to treatment for patients and better terms of employment for those that are needed.
I must congratulate you for waiting until these reforms come into operation this time you are usually muscvh quicker than that to blame the gvt. I see once again EW has had to correct you.

jar

unread,
Jul 1, 2012, 3:34:40 AM7/1/12
to gpn-general-po...@googlegroups.com
Is there nothing that will stop this prat from interupting an interesting debate.

Jonksy

unread,
Jul 1, 2012, 3:36:44 AM7/1/12
to gpn-general-po...@googlegroups.com
 
Yes there is, stop posting tory indoctrinated shite jar..
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages