I disagree Tabor, the present administration and opposition parties
are both opportunistic in this situation, both would love an excuse to
ban what they see as a risong tide of nationalistic support for a
party neither wants to see gain a power base inside British politics
or within the British political system, it would be acutely
embarrasing for them both.
Both are completely capable of utilising the UAF as a totally deniable
force for instigating violence in which even children get hurt because
their parents are seen as right wing targets, I would believe on
historical grounds, that the ultra left would see the death of a child
belonging to a BNP member as being some kind of punishment for the
parents political affiliations, such incidents have never historically
damaged the left but tended to romantacise their self appointment as
the guardians of liberal thinking, to them such a death would be an
entirely acceptable piece of martyrdom highlighing the evils of the
right as having visited upon some innocent soul, the very act itself.
The Bolsheviks never shied away form executing the children of their
opponents, rich or otherwise, and historcially, communists and
marxists have acted in exactly this way over the past century or so,
and in some places, still are, notably, North Korea, where being born
to the wrong family condems you as a child too, in full.
I believe that there are element within the UAF who see themselves as
freedom fighters in some great divine cause to purge the world of
those who do not share the radical left's view on life and the world.
These psychotics are the ones in control of the UAF and others like
them, their lives committed to their cause at any cost, today, the
BNP, tomorrow the right wing of the conservative party, who knows...
On 10 Aug, 09:23, "
taborp...@googlemail.com"
> > >
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/article6789378.ece-Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -