GPeerReview

Find answer for any question here http://sulug.sun.ac.za/cgi-bin/moin.cgi/airline-discounters-68

Indeed, if performing reviews was widely recognized as a useful contribution to the science, then

Thankyou, this looks like a much more credible venue. It appears to me that attendance costs $495,

Open source circles are fond of telling the story about how when Microsoft obtained market dominance

Wow, take a look at this! http://michaelnielsen.org/blog/?page_id=181 This guy wrote the book on

I moved the design-specification into the wiki (http://code.google.com/ p/gpeerreview/wiki/

Wikipedia would be a really cool proving ground, but it lacks author culpability since many authors

I agree. I only found this forum today, but I left some comments on http://code.google.com/p/

That's worth considering, but I don't think it's a big problem. After all, there are

Niko, I didn't mean that I advocate the 80% rule from the Neff and Julian paper. I'm not sure

I think I had read your post too quickly and missed your point. I'm sorry about that. I

Google's only involvement so far is that they provide free hosting for open source projects. I

Thanks for pointing this out. I hadn't heard of ResearchBlogging.org. If we could possibly unify

I did a preliminary investigation of re-implementing GPeerReview as a web app. It looks like all of

Scientists have already hooked brains directly to computers by means of metal electrodes, in the hope