Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion Can Google confirm on uses of Sitemaps??? Googler JohnMu's insights
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Phil Payne  
View profile  
 More options Jun 16 2008, 11:01 am
From: Phil Payne
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 08:01:56 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Mon, Jun 16 2008 11:01 am
Subject: Re: Can Google confirm on uses of Sitemaps??? Googler JohnMu's insights

>> "On one hand, by giving Google a sitemap file with all the changes,
>> and a list of your most important pages - you are also giving those
>> details to your competitors. Yes, that Sitemap file is public for
>> Google and for your competitors."

He has a point, but we are still in the VERY early days of sitemap
adoption.  Relatively few sites have them, and far fewer have sensible
ones.

I like the robots.txt discovery mechanism.  So far I haven't seen
anyone write a piece of code that scans domains for a robots.txt file
containing a sitemap definition and then uses that for marketing
purposes.

"Dear webmaster@.. - did you know that your sitemap is garbage and the
page you set as highest priority has 1,723 W3C validation errors?"

But I'm thinking about it.


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.