|
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 |
From: softplus
Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2006 01:11:58 -0000
Local: Sat, Dec 23 2006 8:11 pm
Subject: Re: Excluded after today's discussion in here
Yes, it's pointing me to the guidelines as well. There is at least one
other thread about it here in the groups, probably some more elsewhere. >Has anyone considered that these web-spammers might be given too much Might be. But at the risk of being insensitive (sorry) - I think this >attention, at the cost of the serious webmasters. group would be filled to the top with people complaining if sites left and right were removed from the index automatically. Each legitimate site is tragedy and I don't think they do it lightly (but who knows). >From :"Using Rank Propagation and Probabilistic Counting for Link-Based Spam Detection" ( http://www.dcc.uchile.cl/%7Eccastill/papers/becchetti_06_automatic_li... ) >Fortunately, web spam detection can be more strict than Another similar train of thought is: if you rank high (or have a high >e-mail spam detection. While losing a relevant e-mail message >is very bad, demoting a relevant Web page in the search results >is not so bad, because if the page is relevant, it can be found later >by following links, or it can be moved to the second or third >page of results. PR) then you need a lot of good links. If those links do not bring you traffic, are they really good? Would those links have been better placed elsewhere (where you do get traffic)? John You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| |||||||||||||