The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
From: vr
Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 11:27:21 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Fri, May 30 2008 2:27 pm
Subject: Re: Showing SiteLinks at Number 61 Spot
Yulia sorry I am going to disagree with you. The site ranked top 10
before these links got out of control. It is a big mistake that we will not make again. The site ranked for alot of terms. Also to think there is no penalty is not reasonable at all. If you search for vacationrealty a very uncommon term you see the site is on page four now at least not 6. To tell me that this site would not rank for vacationrealty with no spaces is highly unlikely unless their is a penalty. On May 29, 10:32 am, Yulia wrote:
> Please don't feel offended on this opinion.
> The reason you won't be getting back right away is simple. Your great > ranking was based on the linking techniques. Once it was discovered > (or found as not the best practice), your site became what it > origianally was - a great site amoung hundreds of great sites in the > same industry. So now without any linking advantages you have to > compete with other greats in the industry and the rank is now based on > their ranking algorithm. I don't think your site is under any penalty > at all - the rank just reflects current (more accurate) position of it > on the net. I've seen it happen very often. > On May 14, 1:31 am, vr wrote:
> > Just wanted to give anyone who read this an update. We are still
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||