Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon.
Switch to the new Google Groups.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion Two weeks in Google Jail and No Chance of Parole it would seem!!
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Sebastian  
View profile  
 More options Jul 11 2007, 9:24 am
From: Sebastian
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 13:24:02 -0000
Local: Wed, Jul 11 2007 9:24 am
Subject: Re: Two weeks in Google Jail and No Chance of Parole it would seem!!
I looked at this site yesterday, checked a few potential issues WRT
crawlability and such, found a lot of content shared with the rest of
the Web, probably inserted by cheap copywriters, hated the prominent
AdSense spots forcing me to scroll down, thought just a somewhat
exotic scraper site, got distracted in IM and moved on. Actually, it
perfectly fits the profile of a MFA-scraper site, although it's guilty
for just "manual scraping" and the professional scraper would never
risk to lose focus that way.

The problem is a site wide issue, and I doubt it is repairable with
reasonable efforts. I'd develop a somewhat intelligent watering can
testing referrer, user location, broker etcetera to find a somewhat
related page and feed it with low cost traffic while I start over
creating a content rich and better focused new site on another domain.

I know it's hard to give up a site after 10 years, but a clear cut
might be the best medicine.

Sebastian

On Jul 11, 1:56 pm, Burt wrote:

> Yes, it looks like MFA, and it smells like MFA, and it is possibly a
> lot of rewritten content found somewhere else.

> Adam says:

> "The reductions in rankings you've experienced are not going to be
> reversed by simple technical or structural changes"

> But with all respect Adam, we are not talking reduction of rankings
> here, which would be appropriate may be.

> We are talking about a ban.

> If lack of originality causes a ban, I have some better
> suggestions  :) proxies?

> I haven't looked at the back link structure, I only saw the
> translation scraping, and "funny" redirects from google translated
> pages after the scrape. I would ban him for that.

> On Jul 11, 7:10 pm, JLH wrote:

> > I'm not sure what to think on this one.  Sure it's a MFA site, but


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.