Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon.
Switch to the new Google Groups.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion Dynamic vs. static URLs: a Pop Picks follow-up
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
vseo  
View profile  
 More options Sep 24 2008, 4:13 am
From: vseo
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 01:13:47 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Wed, Sep 24 2008 4:13 am
Subject: Re: Dynamic vs. static URLs: a Pop Picks follow-up
From spain,
It has being a lot of work to set the rewrites for every url.
I don´t think users will enjoy this movement, they want to see what
ther are looking for on the url. Actually, most of the sites without
rewrite are just dinamicaly generated content made just for SPAM and
users belive that.
I have being following the Google Rules for many years but.
As my rewrites are not generating duplicated content, and in the pages
they made I set up a robots with disallow
My users want to see the keywords they are looking for on the url
Accesibility and usability demands semantic url
Google is not the only search engine.
Sorry man, I´m not going to make any change to the url

On 24 sep, 07:39, sfraise wrote:

> Nah I'm done, just wanted to go off on a rant for a bit lol.

> I don't know if the url change was the cause of falling out in yahoo
> today or just a coincidence durring an update but we're back up there.
> I'll just keep waiting on Google and hope the url change helps.

> Thanks for all the help John!

> On Sep 23, 6:52 pm, seriocomic wrote:> Thanks John,

> > This clears things up somewhat.

> > I can understand that out of the millions of sites out there that use
> > dynamic URL's there are a large proportion that get URL rewriting
> > wrong (or rewrite 'unhelpfully' from Google's point of view) - so that
> > is where the focus is for this recommendation.

> > I think the original post should have been written to reflect that
> > difference, that, if done correctly, rewriting is OK, but for the
> > large part Google recommends leaving URLs alone. The post came across
> > largely as a denouncement of rewriting.


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.