Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon.
Switch to the new Google Groups.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion Dynamic vs. static URLs: a Pop Picks follow-up
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
sfraise  
View profile  
 More options Sep 23 2008, 7:21 pm
From: sfraise
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 16:21:53 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Tues, Sep 23 2008 7:21 pm
Subject: Re: Dynamic vs. static URLs: a Pop Picks follow-up
Well I've got all versions of the home page 301 redirected as far as
the non www version pointing to the www version, the /index.php?
option=com_frontpage&Itemid=1 pointed to the regular main url, and
the /index.php redirected to the main url so that should take care of
the front page anyway. Other than that I have a video component to the
site, a profiles component of the site, a blog componenent, a forum, a
photo gallery in each profile, a groups component, and a whole slug of
other small components to the site with 30,000 registered members. So
here I would have to change the url to each photo, each video, each
forum post, and each blog post ect.

I just can't do that at this point, I'm just going to stick with the
idea of building a good quality website that people want to use and
hope Google can catch up and just rely on the traffic we bring in from
the other two search engines until that day comes. There's no doubt in
my mind that the only other chat site out there that should beat me at
this point is Yahoo, and given the fact that they are filled with spam
bots the only thing going for them is the fact that so many people
have used it for so many years. We have every single feature they have
minus the spam bots.

I've lost my rankings in Yahoo for the short term by switching back to
non sef urls which will cost me a couple thousand dollars a month
until they get us sorted back out, I just hope this move works to
finally get ranked in Google and that the short term loss pays off in
the long term.

I'm starting to get irritated with being burried by a bunch of penny
ante straight html sites with 2 or 3 pages and a simple cheesy generic
chat script with no features or profile systems that are all part of
the same site which just builds hundreds of crappy "directories" and
mirror sites to link back to themselves.... "cough" (chat avenue) in
Google. I mean these people have no content at all and my trouble
seems to be too much content. How does this coincide with Google's
phillosiphy?

I'm sure it will all work out, I just hope I don't have to eat spam
and romain noodles forever waiting on it.

On Sep 23, 2:45 pm, JohnMu wrote:

> Hi sfraise

> I would really, really recommend setting up 301 redirects, even if it
> is for 30,000 pages (there's usually a fast way to do that, somehow,
> somewhere :) ). Besides search engines, users are otherwise going to
> have a tough time finding your content. It's hard to say how long it
> will take for a change like that to propagate completely, but without
> redirects it will certainly take much longer.

> Good luck!
> John


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.