Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon.
Switch to the new Google Groups.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion Dynamic vs. static URLs: a Pop Picks follow-up
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Michele Mader  
View profile  
 More options Sep 23 2008, 2:17 am
From: Michele Mader
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2008 23:17:30 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Tues, Sep 23 2008 2:17 am
Subject: Re: Dynamic vs. static URLs: a Pop Picks follow-up
Are the following urls going to have different SERP for search
[keyword]?

http://www.mysite.com/keyword/subsection/item

http://www.mysite.com/index.php?q1=keyword&q2=subsection&q3=item

If they are equal or the second is better, is a 301 redirect from the
first to the second enough to not loose visitors or we have to keep
static urls for old sections of our sites and dynamic urls for new
contents?

Thank you.
Michele Mader

On Sep 23, 7:46 am, JohnMu wrote:

> Hi sfraise

> In a case like that, I would definitely recommend staying with the
> dynamic version. To our crawlers, a URL like that is very hard to
> understand. While I wouldn't recommend changing back to dynamic URLs
> on a whim, I would recommend that you reconsider this decision with
> your next redesign.

> In any case, I wouldn't call URLs like that "SEF" (search engine
> friendly); it's more like "SEUF" :)

> John


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.