Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion indexing and ranking.
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Energy  
View profile  
 More options Jun 16 2008, 4:30 am
From: Energy
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 01:30:23 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Mon, Jun 16 2008 4:30 am
Subject: Re: indexing and ranking.
1. Thanks!

2. Yes, "startside" is a sensible, relevant, reasonable search term.
That is the word you would use to search to find you’re old homepage
after updating MSN and when you forgot to clear the checkbox ”Set MSN
as start page...."

3. Yes, it’s more relevant than other sites that are ranked after nr
4. Regarding the index able content, I can’t overload with the word
startside, which would not make sense to the text showed

4. My website is like aol.com, a website you set as homepage.
Therefore I have over 100 categories with links that are related to
the category name. Also these categories drop down in ranking at the
same time as the index page.

5. I’ve been working my ass of to get the content more relevant to the
word “startside” and I have about 12000 links inn with the word
“startside” in the link text (like this: Din Startside)

Another question:  My website is running fine. But when I take a look
at the buffered (from Google) site, it gives a “sys is undefined” for
the scripts, and the tabcontainer I have on the website doesn’t show
in this buffered site. Can this cause the sudden drop of ranking? This
buffered site was loading fine 10 days ago.

On 16 Jun, 10:04, Robbo wrote:

> Autocrat mean that it was good that you told us the URL (many people
> ask questios about their site's indexing but do not say what the
> address is).

> Is [startside] (homepage?) a sensible, relevant, reasonable search
> term to want to rank highly for?

> If so, is your homepage more relevant to that terms than others?  I
> see [startside] in the title but only twice in the indexable content
> of your homepage:

> "Startside - Din startside med nyheter værmelding nettaviser linker"

> And your Homepage has hundreds of other words and phrases.

> And there are thousands of pages with [startside] somewhere in the
> text.

> What have you done so far to make your site's indexable content more
> relevant to [startside] than other sites are?

> Do you have many links from other sites with [startside] in the link
> text?

> Robbo

> On Jun 16, 8:38 am, Energy wrote:

> > Good job on including the URL?

> > I was Ranking as number 5 for the search word "startside" (startpage)
> > for the norwegian search, now I´m a goner for that word. That is the
> > word I´m been working hard to get a good ranking for..

> > On 16 Jun, 01:05, Autocrat wrote:

> > > Good job on including the URL...
> > > fancy giving us some Search Terms that you feel you are not being
> > > ranked properly on?

> > > That way we should see what you are seeing.– Skjul sitert tekst –

> – Vis sitert tekst –


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.