<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
  <title>Google Web Toolkit Contributors Google Group</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit-contributors</link>
  <description>This group is for interested developers to discuss Google Web Toolkit internals and contribute bug-fixes and enhancements. For more information, see: http://code.google.com/webtoolkit/makinggwtbetter.html</description>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Benchmark for widget creation times</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit-contributors/browse_frm/thread/5eb95a652ef26a8f/c0fcc8af1132e9c3?show_docid=c0fcc8af1132e9c3</link>
  <description>
  SGTM. I&#39;ve got more to add once it&#39;s in.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit-contributors/browse_frm/thread/5eb95a652ef26a8f/c0fcc8af1132e9c3?show_docid=c0fcc8af1132e9c3</guid>
  <author>
  j...@google.com
  (Joel Webber)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 01:47:51 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Benchmark for widget creation times</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit-contributors/browse_frm/thread/5eb95a652ef26a8f/f417ca48e0a8ba8d?show_docid=f417ca48e0a8ba8d</link>
  <description>
  Picked up last rounds of feedback from Joel (EmptyBinder weirdness), &lt;br&gt; Thomas and James. Also checkstyle fixes. &lt;br&gt; Barring further objections, I&#39;ll submit this in the morning. There are &lt;br&gt; more tests that could be implemented (Joel may have written them &lt;br&gt; already), but I&#39;d like to get in what I have. &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/127801/diff/2005/2013&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit-contributors/browse_frm/thread/5eb95a652ef26a8f/f417ca48e0a8ba8d?show_docid=f417ca48e0a8ba8d</guid>
  <author>
  rj...@google.com
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 01:29:15 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: [gwt-contrib] Possible bug in DOMImplMozilla</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit-contributors/browse_frm/thread/0060419b883253f8/646d2cdb1530f250?show_docid=646d2cdb1530f250</link>
  <description>
  I&#39;ll look into it tomorrow morning. &lt;br&gt; Thanks, &lt;br&gt; John LaBanca &lt;br&gt; jlaba...@google.com
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit-contributors/browse_frm/thread/0060419b883253f8/646d2cdb1530f250?show_docid=646d2cdb1530f250</guid>
  <author>
  jlaba...@google.com
  (John LaBanca)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 21:39:54 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: [gwt-contrib] Removing the deprecated XxxListeners</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit-contributors/browse_frm/thread/0fe93c4f21dd4967/12435630cb48b9fe?show_docid=12435630cb48b9fe</link>
  <description>
  That&#39;s Really. Good. News! &lt;br&gt; (thanks for this birthday gift ;-) )
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit-contributors/browse_frm/thread/0fe93c4f21dd4967/12435630cb48b9fe?show_docid=12435630cb48b9fe</guid>
  <author>
  t.bro...@gmail.com
  (Thomas Broyer)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 20:09:28 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: [gwt-contrib] Possible bug in DOMImplMozilla</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit-contributors/browse_frm/thread/0060419b883253f8/2867156ce48f8c97?show_docid=2867156ce48f8c97</link>
  <description>
  Looks like you&#39;re right about that. &lt;br&gt; @jlabanca: Correct me if I&#39;m wrong, but didn&#39;t you refactor this stuff a &lt;br&gt; while back? Mind having a look to make sure I&#39;m not missing something?
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit-contributors/browse_frm/thread/0060419b883253f8/2867156ce48f8c97?show_docid=2867156ce48f8c97</guid>
  <author>
  j...@google.com
  (Joel Webber)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 19:37:32 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: JSNI references with * as the parameter list</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit-contributors/browse_frm/thread/68411ed32cf32e82/95a97bb881fddf55?show_docid=95a97bb881fddf55</link>
  <description>
  As would be expected, the trickiest part of this patch has to do with &lt;br&gt; overloading and inheritance. These are dark corners that good code will not &lt;br&gt; rely on, but our tools have to do something with them. &lt;br&gt; I&#39;m not in love with the current algorithm, but what precisely shall we do? &lt;br&gt; It&#39;s certainly important, but let&#39;s be careful not to bike shed the corner
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit-contributors/browse_frm/thread/68411ed32cf32e82/95a97bb881fddf55?show_docid=95a97bb881fddf55</guid>
  <author>
  sp...@google.com
  (Lex Spoon)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 19:36:57 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>[google-web-toolkit] r7352 committed - Fix external issue 4048 - make java.sql.Timestamp emulation...</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit-contributors/browse_frm/thread/90751ba1ac4281ad/a2982aae7253f7b7?show_docid=a2982aae7253f7b7</link>
  <description>
  Revision: 7352 &lt;br&gt; Author: r...@google.com &lt;br&gt; Log: Fix external issue 4048 - make java.sql.Timestamp emulation &lt;br&gt; more lenient about the formatting of the nanoseconds field. &lt;br&gt; Review by: jat &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=7352&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; Modified: &lt;br&gt; /trunk/user/super/com/google/g wt/emul/java/sql/Timestamp.jav a
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit-contributors/browse_frm/thread/90751ba1ac4281ad/a2982aae7253f7b7?show_docid=a2982aae7253f7b7</guid>
  <author>
  codesite-nore...@google.com
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 19:07:01 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: RFE: deprecate user.client.Element and user.client.DOM</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit-contributors/browse_frm/thread/fd60a701cb1a5f0b/de8c6b8d22b889cc?show_docid=de8c6b8d22b889cc</link>
  <description>
  I think I just inadvertently replied to this on another thread, but &lt;br&gt; yes -- this is something we need to get on our roadmap very soon.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit-contributors/browse_frm/thread/fd60a701cb1a5f0b/de8c6b8d22b889cc?show_docid=de8c6b8d22b889cc</guid>
  <author>
  j...@google.com
  (Joel Webber)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 19:02:20 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: TabLayoutPanel not working on IE8</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit-contributors/browse_frm/thread/53e962a8c77755b3/3e8334f34309a28c?show_docid=3e8334f34309a28c</link>
  <description>
  Thanks, Alejandro. I&#39;ll reproduce this locally and enter an issue for it. It &lt;br&gt; sounds like the issue might have something to do with having a block-level &lt;br&gt; element *inside* the tabs two existing divs. float:left on just the &lt;br&gt; outer-most element is supposed to work here, but perhaps that&#39;s not enough &lt;br&gt; on IE.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit-contributors/browse_frm/thread/53e962a8c77755b3/3e8334f34309a28c?show_docid=3e8334f34309a28c</guid>
  <author>
  j...@google.com
  (Joel Webber)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 18:48:55 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: [gwt-contrib] Removing the deprecated XxxListeners</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit-contributors/browse_frm/thread/0fe93c4f21dd4967/eed64e3f4ec7ad72?show_docid=eed64e3f4ec7ad72</link>
  <description>
  A hearty +1 from me. We&#39;ve been needing to do this for a while, but have &lt;br&gt; been so heads-down on new features that it&#39;s fallen by the wayside. On that &lt;br&gt; note, we also need to deprecate the DOM class and fix all the widgets to not &lt;br&gt; use it (all its functionality was subsumed by Document/Element a long time
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit-contributors/browse_frm/thread/0fe93c4f21dd4967/eed64e3f4ec7ad72?show_docid=eed64e3f4ec7ad72</guid>
  <author>
  j...@google.com
  (Joel Webber)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 18:45:20 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: JSNI references with * as the parameter list</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit-contributors/browse_frm/thread/68411ed32cf32e82/d9b2cda550e6219a?show_docid=d9b2cda550e6219a</link>
  <description>
  &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/126817/diff/2006/2007&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; File dev/core/test/com/google/gwt/d ev/jjs/impl/JsniRefLookupTest. java &lt;br&gt; (right): &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/126817/diff/2006/2007#newcode234&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; Line 234: JMethod res = (JMethod) lookup(&amp;quot;test.Bar::foo(*)&amp;quot;, errors); &lt;br&gt; It seems weird that this should work. If Bar didn&#39;t declare foo() (and
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit-contributors/browse_frm/thread/68411ed32cf32e82/d9b2cda550e6219a?show_docid=d9b2cda550e6219a</guid>
  <author>
  b...@google.com
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 18:26:37 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: TabLayoutPanel not working on IE8</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit-contributors/browse_frm/thread/53e962a8c77755b3/0b457cfd4330e2a5?show_docid=0b457cfd4330e2a5</link>
  <description>
  Hi, &lt;br&gt; I ran into the same issue with IE7/8 using the css example you suggested &lt;br&gt; here: &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit-contributors/browse_thread/thread/e9d6b9d7ad02b66f&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; but adding float:left to: &lt;br&gt; .gwt-TabLayoutPanelTab { &lt;br&gt; background: url(tab-inactive-left.png) no-repeat bottom left; &lt;br&gt; float:left;
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit-contributors/browse_frm/thread/53e962a8c77755b3/0b457cfd4330e2a5?show_docid=0b457cfd4330e2a5</guid>
  <author>
  aga...@gmail.com
  (Alejandro D. Garin)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 17:30:33 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: JsDuplicateFunctionRemover</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit-contributors/browse_frm/thread/c1b1fca25af762e6/d1521a9c70bef289?show_docid=d1521a9c70bef289</link>
  <description>
  The code looks good, but I&#39;d like to try it out before a final approval. &lt;br&gt; Can you repost a patch with the missing little bits fixed up? &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/126818/diff/1/2&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; File dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/de v/jjs/JavaToJavaScriptCompiler .java &lt;br&gt; (right): &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/126818/diff/1/2#newcode264&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit-contributors/browse_frm/thread/c1b1fca25af762e6/d1521a9c70bef289?show_docid=d1521a9c70bef289</guid>
  <author>
  sp...@google.com
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 17:28:18 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: StackLayoutPanel has no styles at all??</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit-contributors/browse_frm/thread/85c029dfb32704a5/183eee83594c618b?show_docid=183eee83594c618b</link>
  <description>
  You&#39;re right, there is no notification to stack-header widgets of their &lt;br&gt; selection state. I&#39;ll make a note to add a standard way for them to be &lt;br&gt; notified of this. &lt;br&gt; As for standard CSS, with the current design (i.e., your own widget is the &lt;br&gt; only header element), there&#39;s nothing to add a default style to. Perhaps we
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit-contributors/browse_frm/thread/85c029dfb32704a5/183eee83594c618b?show_docid=183eee83594c618b</guid>
  <author>
  j...@google.com
  (Joel Webber)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 17:05:01 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: TabLayoutPanel not working on IE8</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit-contributors/browse_frm/thread/53e962a8c77755b3/43fe0084080a0dec?show_docid=43fe0084080a0dec</link>
  <description>
  Which element did you have to add float:left to? It&#39;s set manually in code &lt;br&gt; to the outermost tab element, which is all that *should* be necessary.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit-contributors/browse_frm/thread/53e962a8c77755b3/43fe0084080a0dec?show_docid=43fe0084080a0dec</guid>
  <author>
  j...@google.com
  (Joel Webber)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 17:01:05 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
