Starting today, I noticed that when adding a gadget to a blip, the
blip size is not calculated correctly and only part of the gadget is
shown. This was not the behavior until yesterday, and also on the
preview version it still works fine, i.e. the blip size is adjusted
automatically to fully accommodate the gadget.
I could not find any way in the API to set the blip size
programatically.
Boaz
That sounds like a regression issue with our latest release. Can you
point me to a wave where you saw this? (Or steps for replication?)
- pamela
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Wave API" group.
> To post to this group, send email to google-...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-wave-a...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-wave-api?hl=en.
>
>
>
>
Here is the URL to the wave:
https://wave.google.com/a/wavesandbox.com/#restored:wave:wavesandbox.com!w%252BLPKAwVNno.1
Boaz
On Jan 6, 4:34 am, "pamela (Google Employee)" <pamela...@gmail.com>
wrote:
https://wave.google.com/wave/#restored:wave:googlewave.com!w%252BUzp-yCeJK
On Jan 7, 1:13 pm, boaz sapir <sapirb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Pamela,
>
> Here is the URL to the wave:
>
> https://wave.google.com/a/wavesandbox.com/#restored:wave:wavesandbox....
- pamela
On Jan 10, 5:23 pm, "pamela (Google Employee)" <pamela...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Can you add public to that wave? (Or if you don't want to do that, add
> pamela....@wavesandbox.com/pamela....@googlewave.com?)
>
> - pamela
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 1:18 AM, boaz sapir <sapirb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Now the problem also exists on the preview version:
>
> >https://wave.google.com/wave/#restored:wave:googlewave.com!w%252BUzp-...
I believe the change in behavior is because we changed the default
start height of gadgets - we used to start them taller, but it didn't
look good when a tall loading screen became a tiny gadget.
- pamela
On Jan 11, 1:40 am, "pamela (Google Employee)" <pamela...@gmail.com>
wrote: