I have been a developer for the past few days and I think that I have
come up with a great idea. I'm sure I'm not the first to think of
this, but it will be great if we are able to develop it.
So I thought that it would be an awesome feature of google wave to
have it power a forum. Each thread, instead of being multiple
different posts, it would just be a google wave. So, instead of having
to try a discussion by posting and going back to the page and checking
for new replies and while you were posting, you missed a new part of
the discussion, you can post like you are having an instant-message
session and you can also save the posts like forum threads. I really
think that this would be a great use of the google wave api.
If anyone is interested in developing this with me, please feel free
to email me at acam...@gmail.com, message me on this site, or just
post a reply. Thanks so much!
Are you in the sandbox? I'm brainstorming with a group of guys right
now the means to use google wave to manage all the content on a forum/
groups/blogs/social networking site. :)
> I have been a developer for the past few days and I think that I have
> come up with a great idea. I'm sure I'm not the first to think of
> this, but it will be great if we are able to develop it.
> So I thought that it would be an awesome feature of google wave to
> have it power a forum. Each thread, instead of being multiple
> different posts, it would just be a google wave. So, instead of having
> to try a discussion by posting and going back to the page and checking
> for new replies and while you were posting, you missed a new part of
> the discussion, you can post like you are having an instant-message
> session and you can also save the posts like forum threads. I really
> think that this would be a great use of the google wave api.
> If anyone is interested in developing this with me, please feel free
> to email me at acam...@gmail.com, message me on this site, or just
> post a reply. Thanks so much!
> Are you in the sandbox? I'm brainstorming with a group of guys right
> now the means to use google wave to manage all the content on a forum/
> groups/blogs/social networking site. :)
> On Aug 23, 7:38 pm, Andrew Camel <acam...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hey guys,
> > I have been a developer for the past few days and I think that I have
> > come up with a great idea. I'm sure I'm not the first to think of
> > this, but it will be great if we are able to develop it.
> > So I thought that it would be an awesome feature of google wave to
> > have it power a forum. Each thread, instead of being multiple
> > different posts, it would just be a google wave. So, instead of having
> > to try a discussion by posting and going back to the page and checking
> > for new replies and while you were posting, you missed a new part of
> > the discussion, you can post like you are having an instant-message
> > session and you can also save the posts like forum threads. I really
> > think that this would be a great use of the google wave api.
> > If anyone is interested in developing this with me, please feel free
> > to email me at acam...@gmail.com, message me on this site, or just
> > post a reply. Thanks so much!
> This is exactly the same usage I was looking for. I'm in the sandbox now,
> MrDubi...@wavesandbox.com
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 2:21 AM, Miki Marsala <miki.mars...@gmail.com>wrote:
>> Are you in the sandbox? I'm brainstorming with a group of guys right
>> now the means to use google wave to manage all the content on a forum/
>> groups/blogs/social networking site. :)
>> On Aug 23, 7:38 pm, Andrew Camel <acam...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Hey guys,
>> > I have been a developer for the past few days and I think that I have
>> > come up with a great idea. I'm sure I'm not the first to think of
>> > this, but it will be great if we are able to develop it.
>> > So I thought that it would be an awesome feature of google wave to
>> > have it power a forum. Each thread, instead of being multiple
>> > different posts, it would just be a google wave. So, instead of having
>> > to try a discussion by posting and going back to the page and checking
>> > for new replies and while you were posting, you missed a new part of
>> > the discussion, you can post like you are having an instant-message
>> > session and you can also save the posts like forum threads. I really
>> > think that this would be a great use of the google wave api.
>> > If anyone is interested in developing this with me, please feel free
>> > to email me at acam...@gmail.com, message me on this site, or just
>> > post a reply. Thanks so much!
I sent you a wave and added you to the conversation wave I have
discussing the best way to integrate google wave into forums with
groups and whatnot (social networking type sites with forum
integrated). :)
Also, if you see the discussion, the groupy bot has been brought up
already. :)
On Aug 24, 12:24 am, Chris Jenkins <digitalprecip...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Are you in the sandbox? I'm brainstorming with a group of guys right
> now the means to use google wave to manage all the content on a forum/
> groups/blogs/social networking site. :)
> On Aug 23, 7:38 pm, Andrew Camel <acam...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hey guys,
> > I have been a developer for the past few days and I think that I have
> > come up with a great idea. I'm sure I'm not the first to think of
> > this, but it will be great if we are able to develop it.
> > So I thought that it would be an awesome feature of google wave to
> > have it power a forum. Each thread, instead of being multiple
> > different posts, it would just be a google wave. So, instead of having
> > to try a discussion by posting and going back to the page and checking
> > for new replies and while you were posting, you missed a new part of
> > the discussion, you can post like you are having an instant-message
> > session and you can also save the posts like forum threads. I really
> > think that this would be a great use of the google wave api.
> > If anyone is interested in developing this with me, please feel free
> > to email me at acam...@gmail.com, message me on this site, or just
> > post a reply. Thanks so much!
Can you add me ovnicr...@wavesandbox.com, i am interesting about it :)
-- Cristian Salamea
CEO GnuThink Software Labs
Software Libre / Open Source
(+593-8) 4-36-44-48
Okay, you two have been added to the discussion. Be gentle with it,
it's a rough brainstorming session.
(This is actually the development request that got me into the
sandbox, btw). ;)
I also feel that if we get this done in a streamlined manner and put
up our code... perhaps when sites like myspace/facebook/etc convert to
wave (if they're interested...obviously it'll be a more difficult
transition for them because they'd have to link their old content
somehow and integrate their users), we'll all only have one login for
all of our sites that we go to...one user profile, one login....
it'll be awesome. :)
In the meantime, if we get this done before wave is released to the
public...once it IS released to the public, we'll have sites that are
cutting-edge - since only those of us with the sandbox access will
have this done before the release. :) I think that's a pretty cool
bragging right in and of itself.
> Okay, you two have been added to the discussion. Be gentle with it,
> it's a rough brainstorming session.
> (This is actually the development request that got me into the
> sandbox, btw). ;)
> I also feel that if we get this done in a streamlined manner and put
> up our code... perhaps when sites like myspace/facebook/etc convert to
> wave (if they're interested...obviously it'll be a more difficult
> transition for them because they'd have to link their old content
> somehow and integrate their users), we'll all only have one login for
> all of our sites that we go to...one user profile, one login....
> it'll be awesome. :)
> In the meantime, if we get this done before wave is released to the
> public...once it IS released to the public, we'll have sites that are
> cutting-edge - since only those of us with the sandbox access will
> have this done before the release. :) I think that's a pretty cool
> bragging right in and of itself.
> I wouldn't mind being added to the 'brainstorming'..
> (fo...@wavesandbox.com)
> Thanks,
> Eli
> On Aug 24, 2:51 pm, Miki Marsala <miki.mars...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Okay, you two have been added to the discussion. Be gentle with it,
>> it's a rough brainstorming session.
>> (This is actually the development request that got me into the
>> sandbox, btw). ;)
>> I also feel that if we get this done in a streamlined manner and put
>> up our code... perhaps when sites like myspace/facebook/etc convert
>> to
>> wave (if they're interested...obviously it'll be a more difficult
>> transition for them because they'd have to link their old content
>> somehow and integrate their users), we'll all only have one login for
>> all of our sites that we go to...one user profile, one login....
>> it'll be awesome. :)
>> In the meantime, if we get this done before wave is released to the
>> public...once it IS released to the public, we'll have sites that are
>> cutting-edge - since only those of us with the sandbox access will
>> have this done before the release. :) I think that's a pretty cool
>> bragging right in and of itself.
Yea, this is the first thought many of us had. At the moment i am waiting
for a bit more of the embed SDK to exist. Until then, it still may be
possible to do many things, but the integration is poor and all around not
worth it imo.
Once the Embed API gets some more love, we'll be integrating Waves into
everything hehe :)
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 2:23 AM, Sam Osborne <sam.tosbo...@googlemail.com>wrote:
> On 29 Aug 2009, at 22:55, Eli <eli.fo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I wouldn't mind being added to the 'brainstorming'..
> > (fo...@wavesandbox.com)
> > Thanks,
> > Eli
> > On Aug 24, 2:51 pm, Miki Marsala <miki.mars...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Okay, you two have been added to the discussion. Be gentle with it,
> >> it's a rough brainstorming session.
> >> (This is actually the development request that got me into the
> >> sandbox, btw). ;)
> >> I also feel that if we get this done in a streamlined manner and put
> >> up our code... perhaps when sites like myspace/facebook/etc convert
> >> to
> >> wave (if they're interested...obviously it'll be a more difficult
> >> transition for them because they'd have to link their old content
> >> somehow and integrate their users), we'll all only have one login for
> >> all of our sites that we go to...one user profile, one login....
> >> it'll be awesome. :)
> >> In the meantime, if we get this done before wave is released to the
> >> public...once it IS released to the public, we'll have sites that are
> >> cutting-edge - since only those of us with the sandbox access will
> >> have this done before the release. :) I think that's a pretty cool
> >> bragging right in and of itself.
> Yea, this is the first thought many of us had. At the moment i am waiting
> for a bit more of the embed SDK to exist. Until then, it still may be
> possible to do many things, but the integration is poor and all around not
> worth it imo.
> Once the Embed API gets some more love, we'll be integrating Waves into
> everything hehe :)
> On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 2:23 AM, Sam Osborne <sam.tosbo...@googlemail.com>wrote:
> > Can I be added too? I think this is a great idea! Also, Wave in
> > Facebook: the inline reply/live typing features would work wonders here!
> > On 29 Aug 2009, at 22:55, Eli <eli.fo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > I wouldn't mind being added to the 'brainstorming'..
> > > (fo...@wavesandbox.com)
> > > Thanks,
> > > Eli
> > > On Aug 24, 2:51 pm, Miki Marsala <miki.mars...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> Okay, you two have been added to the discussion. Be gentle with it,
> > >> it's a rough brainstorming session.
> > >> (This is actually the development request that got me into the
> > >> sandbox, btw). ;)
> > >> I also feel that if we get this done in a streamlined manner and put
> > >> up our code... perhaps when sites like myspace/facebook/etc convert
> > >> to
> > >> wave (if they're interested...obviously it'll be a more difficult
> > >> transition for them because they'd have to link their old content
> > >> somehow and integrate their users), we'll all only have one login for
> > >> all of our sites that we go to...one user profile, one login....
> > >> it'll be awesome. :)
> > >> In the meantime, if we get this done before wave is released to the
> > >> public...once it IS released to the public, we'll have sites that are
> > >> cutting-edge - since only those of us with the sandbox access will
> > >> have this done before the release. :) I think that's a pretty cool
> > >> bragging right in and of itself.
> On Aug 31, 8:29 am, Lee Olayvar <leeolay...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Yea, this is the first thought many of us had. At the moment i am waiting
> > for a bit more of the embed SDK to exist. Until then, it still may be
> > possible to do many things, but the integration is poor and all around not
> > worth it imo.
> > Once the Embed API gets some more love, we'll be integrating Waves into
> > everything hehe :)
> > On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 2:23 AM, Sam Osborne <sam.tosbo...@googlemail.com>wrote:
> > > Can I be added too? I think this is a great idea! Also, Wave in
> > > Facebook: the inline reply/live typing features would work wonders here!
> > > On 29 Aug 2009, at 22:55, Eli <eli.fo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > I wouldn't mind being added to the 'brainstorming'..
> > > > (fo...@wavesandbox.com)
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Eli
> > > > On Aug 24, 2:51 pm, Miki Marsala <miki.mars...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >> Okay, you two have been added to the discussion. Be gentle with it,
> > > >> it's a rough brainstorming session.
> > > >> (This is actually the development request that got me into the
> > > >> sandbox, btw). ;)
> > > >> I also feel that if we get this done in a streamlined manner and put
> > > >> up our code... perhaps when sites like myspace/facebook/etc convert
> > > >> to
> > > >> wave (if they're interested...obviously it'll be a more difficult
> > > >> transition for them because they'd have to link their old content
> > > >> somehow and integrate their users), we'll all only have one login for
> > > >> all of our sites that we go to...one user profile, one login....
> > > >> it'll be awesome. :)
> > > >> In the meantime, if we get this done before wave is released to the
> > > >> public...once it IS released to the public, we'll have sites that are
> > > >> cutting-edge - since only those of us with the sandbox access will
> > > >> have this done before the release. :) I think that's a pretty cool
> > > >> bragging right in and of itself.
> Hi, I'm interested in the Wave Forum too, add me at
> bel...@wavesandbox.com please!
> On Sep 1, 2:44 pm, Eryk <e.rykwal...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Please add me to the discussion as well, I was planning on getting to
> > this at some point in time.
> > On Aug 31, 8:29 am, Lee Olayvar <leeolay...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Yea, this is the first thought many of us had. At the moment i am
> waiting
> > > for a bit more of the embed SDK to exist. Until then, it still may be
> > > possible to do many things, but the integration is poor and all around
> not
> > > worth it imo.
> > > Once the Embed API gets some more love, we'll be integrating Waves into
> > > everything hehe :)
> > > On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 2:23 AM, Sam Osborne <
> sam.tosbo...@googlemail.com>wrote:
> > > > Can I be added too? I think this is a great idea! Also, Wave in
> > > > Facebook: the inline reply/live typing features would work wonders
> here!
> > > > On 29 Aug 2009, at 22:55, Eli <eli.fo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > I wouldn't mind being added to the 'brainstorming'..
> > > > > (fo...@wavesandbox.com)
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Eli
> > > > > On Aug 24, 2:51 pm, Miki Marsala <miki.mars...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >> Okay, you two have been added to the discussion. Be gentle with
> it,
> > > > >> it's a rough brainstorming session.
> > > > >> (This is actually the development request that got me into the
> > > > >> sandbox, btw). ;)
> > > > >> I also feel that if we get this done in a streamlined manner and
> put
> > > > >> up our code... perhaps when sites like myspace/facebook/etc
> convert
> > > > >> to
> > > > >> wave (if they're interested...obviously it'll be a more difficult
> > > > >> transition for them because they'd have to link their old content
> > > > >> somehow and integrate their users), we'll all only have one login
> for
> > > > >> all of our sites that we go to...one user profile, one login....
> > > > >> it'll be awesome. :)
> > > > >> In the meantime, if we get this done before wave is released to
> the
> > > > >> public...once it IS released to the public, we'll have sites that
> are
> > > > >> cutting-edge - since only those of us with the sandbox access will
> > > > >> have this done before the release. :) I think that's a pretty
> cool
> > > > >> bragging right in and of itself.
> > > > >> Anyhow... behave in my private wave. :D
> > On Aug 31, 8:29 am, Lee Olayvar <leeolay...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Yea, this is the first thought many of us had. At the moment i am waiting
> > > for a bit more of the embed SDK to exist. Until then, it still may be
> > > possible to do many things, but the integration is poor and all around not
> > > worth it imo.
> > > Once the Embed API gets some more love, we'll be integrating Waves into
> > > everything hehe :)
> > > On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 2:23 AM, Sam Osborne <sam.tosbo...@googlemail.com>wrote:
> > > > Can I be added too? I think this is a great idea! Also, Wave in
> > > > Facebook: the inline reply/live typing features would work wonders here!
> > > > On 29 Aug 2009, at 22:55, Eli <eli.fo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > I wouldn't mind being added to the 'brainstorming'..
> > > > > (fo...@wavesandbox.com)
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Eli
> > > > > On Aug 24, 2:51 pm, Miki Marsala <miki.mars...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >> Okay, you two have been added to the discussion. Be gentle with it,
> > > > >> it's a rough brainstorming session.
> > > > >> (This is actually the development request that got me into the
> > > > >> sandbox, btw). ;)
> > > > >> I also feel that if we get this done in a streamlined manner and put
> > > > >> up our code... perhaps when sites like myspace/facebook/etc convert
> > > > >> to
> > > > >> wave (if they're interested...obviously it'll be a more difficult
> > > > >> transition for them because they'd have to link their old content
> > > > >> somehow and integrate their users), we'll all only have one login for
> > > > >> all of our sites that we go to...one user profile, one login....
> > > > >> it'll be awesome. :)
> > > > >> In the meantime, if we get this done before wave is released to the
> > > > >> public...once it IS released to the public, we'll have sites that are
> > > > >> cutting-edge - since only those of us with the sandbox access will
> > > > >> have this done before the release. :) I think that's a pretty cool
> > > > >> bragging right in and of itself.
> > > > >> Anyhow... behave in my private wave. :D
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 6:27 AM, Beldar <beldar....@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi, I'm interested in the Wave Forum too, add me at
> bel...@wavesandbox.com please!
> On Sep 1, 2:44 pm, Eryk <e.rykwal...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Please add me to the discussion as well, I was planning on getting to
> > this at some point in time.
> > On Aug 31, 8:29 am, Lee Olayvar <leeolay...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Yea, this is the first thought many of us had. At the moment i am
> waiting
> > > for a bit more of the embed SDK to exist. Until then, it still may be
> > > possible to do many things, but the integration is poor and all around
> not
> > > worth it imo.
> > > Once the Embed API gets some more love, we'll be integrating Waves into
> > > everything hehe :)
> > > On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 2:23 AM, Sam Osborne <
> sam.tosbo...@googlemail.com>wrote:
> > > > Can I be added too? I think this is a great idea! Also, Wave in
> > > > Facebook: the inline reply/live typing features would work wonders
> here!
> > > > On 29 Aug 2009, at 22:55, Eli <eli.fo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > I wouldn't mind being added to the 'brainstorming'..
> > > > > (fo...@wavesandbox.com)
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Eli
> > > > > On Aug 24, 2:51 pm, Miki Marsala <miki.mars...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >> Okay, you two have been added to the discussion. Be gentle with
> it,
> > > > >> it's a rough brainstorming session.
> > > > >> (This is actually the development request that got me into the
> > > > >> sandbox, btw). ;)
> > > > >> I also feel that if we get this done in a streamlined manner and
> put
> > > > >> up our code... perhaps when sites like myspace/facebook/etc
> convert
> > > > >> to
> > > > >> wave (if they're interested...obviously it'll be a more difficult
> > > > >> transition for them because they'd have to link their old content
> > > > >> somehow and integrate their users), we'll all only have one login
> for
> > > > >> all of our sites that we go to...one user profile, one login....
> > > > >> it'll be awesome. :)
> > > > >> In the meantime, if we get this done before wave is released to
> the
> > > > >> public...once it IS released to the public, we'll have sites that
> are
> > > > >> cutting-edge - since only those of us with the sandbox access will
> > > > >> have this done before the release. :) I think that's a pretty
> cool
> > > > >> bragging right in and of itself.
> > > > >> Anyhow... behave in my private wave. :D
> I have been a developer for the past few days and I think that I have
> come up with a great idea. I'm sure I'm not the first to think of
> this, but it will be great if we are able to develop it.
> So I thought that it would be an awesome feature of google wave to
> have it power a forum. Each thread, instead of being multiple
> different posts, it would just be a google wave. So, instead of having
> to try a discussion by posting and going back to the page and checking
> for new replies and while you were posting, you missed a new part of
> the discussion, you can post like you are having an instant-message
> session and you can also save the posts like forum threads. I really
> think that this would be a great use of the google wave api.
> If anyone is interested in developing this with me, please feel free
> to email me at acam...@gmail.com, message me on this site, or just
> post a reply. Thanks so much!
Can you add me fmond...@wavesandbox.com, i am interesting about it
too!
I am also very interested in incorperating wave with my forum. I have
created a website hoping to bring wave users together for some
collaberation. www.wavetable.net. I'll give boards for current
projects and my forum will be going through dramatic changes as I get
wave going with it. Please add me to any relevant wave conversations.
konife...@wavesandbox.com
On Aug 23, 9:38 pm, Andrew Camel <acam...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I have been a developer for the past few days and I think that I have
> come up with a great idea. I'm sure I'm not the first to think of
> this, but it will be great if we are able to develop it.
> So I thought that it would be an awesome feature of google wave to
> have it power aforum. Each thread, instead of being multiple
> different posts, it would just be a google wave. So, instead of having
> to try a discussion by posting and going back to the page and checking
> for new replies and while you were posting, you missed a new part of
> the discussion, you can post like you are having an instant-message
> session and you can also save the posts likeforumthreads. I really
> think that this would be a great use of the google wave api.
> If anyone is interested in developing this with me, please feel free
> to email me at acam...@gmail.com, message me on this site, or just
> post a reply. Thanks so much!
> I sent you a wave and added you to the conversation wave I have
> discussing the best way to integrate google wave into forums with
> groups and whatnot (social networking type sites with forum
> integrated). :)
> Also, if you see the discussion, the groupy bot has been brought up
> already. :)
> On Aug 24, 12:24 am, Chris Jenkins <digitalprecip...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > This is exactly the same usage I was looking for. I'm in the sandbox now,
> > MrDubi...@wavesandbox.com
> I would be happy to be added too. I don't know weither I'm way too
> late, but I could give it a try
> On 24 aug, 20:21, Miki Marsala <miki.mars...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I sent you a wave and added you to the conversation wave I have
> > discussing the best way to integrate google wave into forums with
> > groups and whatnot (social networking type sites with forum
> > integrated). :)
> > Also, if you see the discussion, the groupy bot has been brought up
> > already. :)
> > On Aug 24, 12:24 am, Chris Jenkins <digitalprecip...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > This is exactly the same usage I was looking for. I'm in the sandbox now,
> > > MrDubi...@wavesandbox.com
> i admin on a few forums and used to run a big MTB forum on the web.
> really interested to see how wave develops into this area.
> On Sep 29, 10:47 pm, Daniël <egid...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I would be happy to be added too. I don't know weither I'm way too
> > late, but I could give it a try
> > On 24 aug, 20:21, Miki Marsala <miki.mars...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > I sent you a wave and added you to the conversation wave I have
> > > discussing the best way to integrate google wave into forums with
> > > groups and whatnot (social networking type sites with forum
> > > integrated). :)
> > > Also, if you see the discussion, the groupy bot has been brought up
> > > already. :)
> > > On Aug 24, 12:24 am, Chris Jenkins <digitalprecip...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > This is exactly the same usage I was looking for. I'm in the sandbox now,
> > > > MrDubi...@wavesandbox.com
I want to implement Wave into my MMO forum site. If this is successful
for external game interaction for Guilds/Factions I plan to present my
work to the game developers and show the other factions how to use it.
> I want to implement Wave into my MMO forum site. If this is successful
> for external game interaction for Guilds/Factions I plan to present my
> work to the game developers and show the other factions how to use it.
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Google Wave API" group.
> To post to this group, send email to google-wave-api@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> google-wave-api+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com<google-wave-api%2Bunsubscribe@ googlegroups.com>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/google-wave-api?hl=en.
> > I want to implement Wave into my MMO forum site. If this is successful > > for external game interaction for Guilds/Factions I plan to present my > > work to the game developers and show the other factions how to use it.
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "Google Wave API" group. > > To post to this group, send email to google-wave-api@googlegroups.com. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > google-wave-api+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com<google-wave-api%2Bunsubscribe@ googlegroups.com> > > . > > For more options, visit this group at > >http://groups.google.com/group/google-wave-api?hl=en.
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 6:16 PM, Michael K <mk.mat...@gmail.com> wrote: > I would like to be added too please, if it's not too late. I've tried > searching for this wave, but couldn't find it.
> Whichever is more applicable (I guess the 1st): > michaelku...@wavesandbox.com > mk.mat...@googlewave.com
> Thanks.
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Google Wave API" group. > To post to this group, send email to google-wave-api@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > google-wave-api+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com<google-wave-api%2Bunsubscribe@ googlegroups.com> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/google-wave-api?hl=en.
