X-BeenThere: google-summer-of-code-discuss@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.90.19.24 with SMTP id 24ls253914ags.0.p; Tue, 09 Feb 2010 
	15:35:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.90.41.23 with SMTP id o23mr912546ago.7.1265758526781;
        Tue, 09 Feb 2010 15:35:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.90.41.23 with SMTP id o23mr912543ago.7.1265758526732;
        Tue, 09 Feb 2010 15:35:26 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <lhawth...@google.com>
Received: from smtp-out.google.com (wpay10.hot.corp.google.com [172.24.198.10])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id 19si67135ywh.6.2010.02.09.15.35.25;
        Tue, 09 Feb 2010 15:35:25 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of lhawth...@google.com designates 172.24.198.10 as permitted sender)
Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of lhawth...@google.com designates 172.24.198.10 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=lhawth...@google.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header...@google.com
Received: from kpbe17.cbf.corp.google.com (kpbe17.cbf.corp.google.com [172.25.105.81])
	by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id o19NZPrW009824
	for <google-summer-of-code-discuss@googlegroups.com>; Tue, 9 Feb 2010 15:35:25 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=beta;
	t=1265758525; bh=5EGlfxj330nJHCVp6VXadlEETEc=;
	h=MIME-Version:Date:In-Reply-To:References:Message-ID:Subject:From:
	 To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding;
	b=Wy1W4U6qZ3SXw65nwksG5iQ1WHkGojjCsGMg6J+kB32nDoCUQUOYFvfh+NM2vV+f/
	 z4L6ZoE0Q1kSqKgRdQFYg==
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=beta; d=google.com; c=nofws; q=dns;
	h=mime-version:date:in-reply-to:x-ip:references:user-agent:
	x-google-token:x-http-useragent:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type:
	content-transfer-encoding:x-system-of-record;
	b=TbdLBsI/6Lqw21qfwiSD4Qwv3kfWgLW7p0Jw3FCQIdGo68tQgKnjrOB5OrRjbwSbo
	xE66YaBJLo0P0LS48XaxA==
Received: from gxk5 (gxk5.prod.google.com [10.202.11.5])
	by kpbe17.cbf.corp.google.com with ESMTP id o19NZMrE007171
	for <google-summer-of-code-discuss@googlegroups.com>; Tue, 9 Feb 2010 15:35:22 -0800
Received: by gxk5 with SMTP id 5so23290599gxk.19
        for <google-summer-of-code-discuss@googlegroups.com>; Tue, 09 Feb 2010 15:35:22 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.101.165.32 with SMTP id s32mr311504ano.38.1265758521413; Tue, 
	09 Feb 2010 15:35:21 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2010 15:35:21 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <4869cee71002041119g225738adxc2e572cdd9def...@mail.gmail.com>
X-IP: 172.18.104.32
References: <665453968.4398486.1265270210786.JavaMail....@ech3-cdn12.prod> 
	<1f077e771002040022r60594867k17b22afb93d41...@mail.gmail.com> 
	<cdcd36fa1002040558l1a7d1007n3f2c929228794...@mail.gmail.com> 
	<f775ad6e1002040943i765e3af2tb2a803d8cd6ef...@mail.gmail.com> 
	<4869cee71002041119g225738adxc2e572cdd9def...@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US) AppleWebKit/532.5 
	(KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/4.0.249.43 Safari/532.5,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Message-ID: <4ad6d2bf-30f4-4338-9a9b-3fd3f263e...@k2g2000pro.googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Invitation to connect on LinkedIn
From: "LH (Leslie Hawthorn)" <lhawth...@google.com>
To: Google Summer of Code Discuss <google-summer-of-code-discuss@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-System-Of-Record: true

Hello everyone,

On Feb 4, 11:19=A0am, Leslie Hawthorn <lhawth...@google.com> wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> Of course, we should all be careful when inviting our contacts list upon
> joining any social network. This is an easy mistake to make and one I've
> made myself. Forgive, forget, archive, delete, move on. :)

I filed a bug with our groups team on this issue and it was marked
won't fix. With the permission of the engineer who took a look at the
bug, I thought I would share his response on why this bug was marked
won't fix --> working as intended.

"It's working as intended in that we aren't intercepting mail that
isn't spam or wasn't explicitly listed for moderation, and then
moderating it.

If LinkedIn, Facebook, etc. had a uniform way of indicating that this
was a system-sent message, we could probably add it as an option to
"reject", "moderate", or "post" as a setting, but so far they do not
appear to."

Hope this helps,
LH