Gmail Calendar Documents Reader Web more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
max_load_factor should rehash
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  3 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
ShaunJ  
View profile  
 More options Sep 30, 6:54 pm
From: ShaunJ <sjack...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 15:54:03 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Wed, Sep 30 2009 6:54 pm
Subject: max_load_factor should rehash

> The second member function sets the maximum load factor. If this value is less than the current load factor, the unordered multiset is rehashed.

according to this documentation:
http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/comphelp/v9v111/index.jsp?to...

Cheers,
Shaun


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Craig Silverstein  
View profile  
 More options Oct 1, 12:34 pm
From: Craig Silverstein <csilv...@google.com>
Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2009 09:34:15 -0700
Local: Thurs, Oct 1 2009 12:34 pm
Subject: Re: [Opensource-sparsehash] max_load_factor should rehash

} > The second member function sets the maximum load factor. If this
} value is less than the current load factor, the unordered multiset
} is rehashed.

Thank you for the email.  I can't tell if this is intended to be a
normative description of the API, or just an implementation
description of the AIX hash implementation.  The microsoft docs say
nothing about rehashing:
   http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb982704.aspx

max_load_factor itself is a tr1 class, so I think it makes sense to
wait for the tr1 standards doc to come out, and see what it says,
before making any changes.  The IBM doc smells like an implementation
description to me, but I guess we'll see in time...

craig


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
ShaunJ  
View profile  
 More options Oct 1, 12:55 pm
From: ShaunJ <sjack...@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 09:55:28 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Thurs, Oct 1 2009 12:55 pm
Subject: Re: max_load_factor should rehash
Okay. Thanks, Craig.

    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google