Google Groups Home
Help | Sign in
Discussions > Google sitemaps (Archives - *read only*) > Reports of index coverage changes--we're listening!
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  Messages 1 - 25 of 359 - Collapse all   Newer >
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
Google Employee Google employee  
View profile
(9 users)  More options May 10 2006, 5:55 pm
From: Google Employee
Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 14:55:44 -0700
Local: Wed, May 10 2006 5:55 pm
Subject: Reports of index coverage changes--we're listening!
We've been closely following the reports of significant changes in
index coverage for some sites, and have been looking into many possible
causes. We are confident that participation in Sitemaps is not causing
this at all.
(http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/snuffle-snuffle/#comment-24878) Some
degree of change in index coverage is to be expected, as new sites
appear and older sites change.

There are a few things to consider about our overall crawl and indexing
pipeline. As part of some recent updates
(http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/bigdaddy/) we're taking a much closer
look at affiliate links, linkfarms, duplicate content, and other
factors as described in our webmaster quality guidelines
(http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=35772).
Our new crawl caching proxy unifies our crawls
(http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/crawl-caching-proxy/) so you may be
seeing different crawling patterns.

If you have seen a change in your site's coverage in our index, please
post the details here, including site name and changes in coverage. We
do look into every report, though we may not have time to respond to
them all individually.


    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
MT  
View profile
(2 users)  More options May 10 2006, 6:39 pm
From: MT
Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 15:39:24 -0700
Local: Wed, May 10 2006 6:39 pm
Subject: Re: Reports of index coverage changes--we're listening!
I changed the url and used a 301 redirect to the new url and all the
old domain pages indexed have disappeared from Google listings. The new
url has not been indexed at all.

I have submitted a sitemap and it has been crawled. After submitting
the sitemap is when the old domain content was removed.

nascarup.com
motorsporttoday.com


    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
jeffw  
View profile
 More options May 10 2006, 6:57 pm
From: jeffw
Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 15:57:54 -0700
Local: Wed, May 10 2006 6:57 pm
Subject: Re: Reports of index coverage changes--we're listening!
nomisconnections.co.uk - was almost fully indexed, now down to home
page and 29 very old pages listed as Supplemental.

palmviewcyprus.com - was almost fully indexed now down to a handful of
pages plus some very old pages listed as Supplemental.

buyabroad.com - has about 400 pages indexed, got totally wiped out last
month, built up again to 160 but now falling every day (currently at 64
pages).

toptopiary.co.uk - despite constant work on the site, regular visits
from googlebot, can't seem to get pages indexed or exisiting indexed
pages updated.

I have more, but this will do to be going on with ;-)


    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
ViewPlus  
View profile
 More options May 10 2006, 7:05 pm
From: ViewPlus
Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 16:05:21 -0700
Local: Wed, May 10 2006 7:05 pm
Subject: Re: Reports of index coverage changes--we're listening!

Google Employee wrote:
> If you have seen a change in your site's coverage in our index, please
> post the details here, including site name and changes in coverage. We
> do look into every report, though we may not have time to respond to
> them all individually.

This month we have noticed a huge drop in our positions in Google only.
We went from being on page 1 & 2 of some of our phrases to page 15 or
worse. Sitemaps still reports the higher positions that we saw last
moth. Our url is http://www.viewplus.com/

We had some home page content updates last month the most notable being
a new product release and a Tutorial Spotlight which pulled a random
recently added Tutorial and hightlighted it on the home page. Could the
crawler mistakenly view this as some sort of duplicate content? Other
than that I have no idea as to why our google positions could have
dropped so much for all of our keywords.

Regards,
ViewPlus


    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
kdfrawg  
View profile
(3 users)  More options May 10 2006, 7:43 pm
From: kdfrawg
Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 16:43:00 -0700
Subject: Re: Reports of index coverage changes--we're listening!
I am indeed having problems. A lot of people are having problems. I did
some research today, using a search engine that still returns actual
Web content and discovered that this has been going on for MONTHS! If
Google is listening, Google is deaf. In point of fact, Google is
putting people out of business.

Has anything been said during all that time? Not a word. Google has
gone from an honest and interesting company to a company interested in
one thing: the reports on its own stock. Google is already where the
government is trying to take the internet. I, for one, do not wish to
go there.

I'm not sure that there is time for a 12-step program for Google. If
you're going to stay number one in the search business, if you are even
going to survive, you have time for about two steps:

1. Admit that you have a problem.
2. Fix the mess that you have made.


    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
mred  
View profile
 More options May 10 2006, 7:45 pm
From: mred
Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 16:45:24 -0700
Local: Wed, May 10 2006 7:45 pm
Subject: Re: Reports of index coverage changes--we're listening!
Several of my sites have been reduced to home page only in search
results.  One to look at is http://www.perfect-vacations.com/  This
site has been around for about 5 years and has always been listed. Is
there some kind of filter or penalty that has been applied?


    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Lana  
View profile
 More options May 10 2006, 7:51 pm
From: Lana
Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 16:51:50 -0700
Local: Wed, May 10 2006 7:51 pm
Subject: Re: Reports of index coverage changes--we're listening!
Thank you for responding!

http://www.byzantinesacredart.com/ has been fully indexed by Google
since it was created and first submitted (in January 1995) and
additional pages were indexed almost immediately. About a month ago it
was de-indexed by Google and down to five pages (from around 60). I
then created and submitted an .xml sitemap and this seemed to help. In
a day or two I was back to 34 pages, then some 15+ old, non-existent
pages showed up as supplemental, but a day or two later it went down
again to a total of 15, 14 and presently at 11 pages.

I have never used any 'black hat' techniques, I have designed my site
for people not for search engines (because, among other things, I still
don't know how would I design them for SEs) each page is a valid XHTML
strict/CSS and what confuses me most is that the pages that are kept by
Google, apart from the index page, seem to be selected completely
randomly and not by their content. I mean, if I can have only 12 out of
60 pages listed, I would probably replace 5 or 6 that Google lists by
those that have more and better content. The rating (importance) I
assigned to each page in my sitemap doesn't seem to have any effect
either, since many of the pages I consider important have been
de-indexed and some of those I rated as far less important are kept.


    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
gonzo  
View profile
(7 users)  More options May 10 2006, 8:31 pm
From: gonzo
Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 17:31:53 -0700
Local: Wed, May 10 2006 8:31 pm
Subject: Re: Reports of index coverage changes--we're listening!
Well, I for one like Spam. Being a native of Minnesota, and seeing that
it is made here, I have been eating Spam my whole life. I just do not
see what Spam has to do with websites. Sometimes I eat Spam for
breakfast. The GI's like Spam. Why do the computer people Hate Spam so
much? There are starving kids all over the world that would love to
have some Spam. I just don't know
anymore????????????????????????????????

    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
EdCid  
View profile
 More options May 10 2006, 8:35 pm
From: EdCid
Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 17:35:14 -0700
Local: Wed, May 10 2006 8:35 pm
Subject: Re: Reports of index coverage changes--we're listening!
My submitted site has not been indexed since early January 2006, as far
as I can tell all pages adhere to Google's webmaster guidelines. I've
recently added a google sitemap, have used the "site reinclusion"
option and still no luck, the cached version is this January 2006
version which is no longer current.

What should I do?

Cheers,
Ed


    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Google Employee Google employee  
View profile
(2 users)  More options May 10 2006, 8:55 pm
From: Google Employee
Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 17:55:14 -0700
Local: Wed, May 10 2006 8:55 pm
Subject: Re: Reports of index coverage changes--we're listening!
MT: It looks like nascarup.com is still indexed.  You did a 301
redirect from it to motorsporttoday.com, correct?

EdCid, kdfrawg:  Could you please post the URL of your site(s)?

jeffw, ViewPlus, mred, Lana: Thanks for taking the time to post the
details!  I've passed them along to some of our engineers who are
looking into different possibilities in more detail.

gonzo: While we don't really care for spam at all, I suppose that
leaves more of it for people who do like it. :)


    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
jonny ReDHeD UK  
View profile
 More options May 10 2006, 9:04 pm
From: jonny ReDHeD UK
Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 18:04:00 -0700
Subject: Re: Reports of index coverage changes--we're listening!
We too have been using sitemaps ok, verified etc,  until recently.
Our sitemap: http://www.aromatherapy-stress-relief.com/sitemap.xml

website:  Aroma Stress Buster http://www.aromatherapy-stress-relief.com

We had about all our 40 odd pages indexed but just recently they
dropped to 10 and then the day after down to one, the home page,  where
its been for a few weeks now much the same as many others that have
posted here.  Tried a re-inclusion request but still nothing...  its
all very worring for a novice webmaster like myself,  most of our pages
are vaild and we have read the webmaster guidelines and think we
have'nt fallen foul of anything.  please, anyone point out if we have?

Google Employee please take a look at our site and sitemap.

Jonny C
aromatherapy-stress-relief.com


    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
go-fix-it  
View profile
 More options May 10 2006, 9:15 pm
From: go-fix-it
Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 18:15:50 -0700
Local: Wed, May 10 2006 9:15 pm
Subject: Re: Reports of index coverage changes--we're listening!
hi Google Employee and fellow sitemaper's,

I've noticed some changes with my site's indexing since Oct/2005....
new cache/old cache/indexed/not indexed/strange pr's/...and so on.
My site http://www.spo98.net was easy to find in google for the term "
Iron on Letters " (not iron letters), even back when google was a
footnote on search....(LOL, just kidding G-bot), boy times have
changed.  Anyway, it did show up again in Google search results for the
said term again few days ago.... but now it is gone ? again. This
www.spot98.net is NOT a spam site.

So i tried the site:thingee..... when i key in site:www.spot98.net, =
about 350 pages (alot of old cached suppl. plages)... when i key in
www.spot98.net/ (w/slash) = 19 pages.
Go ahead and have a look. ...... i'm totally lost folks, and afraid to
submit a sitemap during this wacky phase.

How can i help fix this ?  .... sorry if this old news... Eh! ....
Help !

thanks, regards.


    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
netgear